Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T04:48:54.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Post-abortion fertility desires, contraceptive uptake and unmet need for family planning: voices of post-abortion care clients in Tanzania

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2020

Colin Baynes Open the ORCID record for Colin Baynes [Opens in a new window] ,
Erick Yegon ,
Grace Lusiola ,
Japhet Achola  and
Rehema Kahando
Colin Baynes*
Affiliation:
EngenderHealth, Washington, DC, USA
Erick Yegon
Affiliation:
EngenderHealth, Nairobi, Kenya
Grace Lusiola
Affiliation:
EngenderHealth, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
Japhet Achola
Affiliation:
EngenderHealth, Nairobi, Kenya
Rehema Kahando
Affiliation:
EngenderHealth, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Post-abortion care (PAC) integrates elements of care that are vital for women’s survival after abortion complications with intervention components that aid women in controlling their fertility, and provides an optimal window of opportunity to help women meet their family planning goals. Yet, incorporating quality family planning services remains a shortcoming of PAC services, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. This paper presents evidence from a mixed method study conducted in Tanzania that aimed at explaining factors that contribute to this challenge. Analysis of data obtained through client exit interviews quantified the level of unmet need for contraception among PAC clients and isolated the factors associated with post-abortion contraceptive uptake. Qualitative data analysis of interviews with a subset of these women explored the multi-level context in which post-abortion pregnancy intentions and contraceptive behaviours are formed. Approximately 30% of women interviewed (N=412) could recall receiving counselling on post-abortion family planning. Nearly two-thirds reported a desire to either space or limit childbearing. Of those who desired to space or limited childbearing, approximately 20% received a contraceptive method before discharge from PAC. The factors significantly associated with post-abortion contraceptive acceptance were completion of primary school, prior use of contraception, receipt of PAC at lower level facilities and recall of post-abortion family planning counselling. Qualitative analysis revealed different layers of contextual influences that shaped women’s fertility desires and contraceptive decision-making during PAC: individual (PAC client), spousal/partner-related, health service-related and societal. While results lend support to the concept that there are opportunities for services to address unmet need for post-abortion family planning, they also attest to the synergistic influences of individual, spousal, organizational and societal factors that influence whether they can be realized during PAC. Several strategies to do so emerged saliently from this analysis. These emphasize customized counselling to enable client–provider communication about fertility preferences, structural intervention aimed at empowering women to assert those objectives in family and health care settings, availability of information and services on post-abortion fertility and contraceptive eligibility in PAC settings and interventions to facilitate constructive spousal communication on family planning and contraceptive use, after abortion and in general.

Keywords

Post-abortion careTanzaniaFamily planning
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 53 , Issue 6 , November 2021 , pp. 908 - 923
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adongo, PB, Phillips, JF, Kajihara, B, Fayorsey, C, Debpuur, C and Binka, FN (1997) Cultural factors constraining the introduction of family planning among the Kassena-Nankana of northern Ghana. Social Science & Medicine 45(12), 1789–1804.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Åhman, E and Shah, IH (2011) New estimates and trends regarding unsafe abortion mortality. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 115(2), 121–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alemayehu, T, Otsea, K, Gebremikael, A, Dagnew, S, Healy, J and Benson, J (2009) Abortion Care Improvements in Tigray, Ethiopia: Using the Safe Abortion Care (SAC) Approach to Monitor the Availability, Utilization and Quality of Services. Ipas, Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar
Aniteye, P and Mayhew, S (2011) Attitudes and experiences of women admitted to hospital with abortion complications in Ghana. African Journal of Reproductive Health 15(1), 47–55.Google ScholarPubMed
Bachrach, C and Morgan, SM (2013) A cognitive–social model of fertility intentions. Population and Development Review 39, 459–485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Banerjee, SK, Gulati, S, Andersen, KL, Acre, V, Warvadekar, J and Navin, D (2015) Associations between abortion services and acceptance of postabortion contraception in six Indian states. Studies in Family Planning 46(4), 387–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barros Pereira, I, Carvalho, IM and Graca, LM (2015) Intra-abortion contraception with etonogestrel subdermal implant. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 185, 33–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baynes, C, Kahwa, J, Lusiola, G, Mwanga, F, Bantambya, J, Ngosso, L and Hiza, M (2019a) What contraception do women use after experiencing complications from abortion? An analysis of cohort records of 18,688 postabortion care clients in Tanzania. BMC Women’s Health 19, 22(1).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baynes, C, Yegon, E, Lusiola, G, Kahando, R, Ngadaya, E and Kahwa, J (2019b) Women’s satisfaction with and perceptions of the quality of postabortion care at public-sector facilities in mainland Tanzania and in Zanzibar. Global Health Science and Practice 7 (Supplement 2), S299–S314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bearak, J, Popinchalk, A, Alkema, L and Sedgh, G (2014) Global, regional, and subregional trends in unintended pregnancy and its outcomes from 1990 to 2014 : estimates from a Bayesian hierarchical model. The Lancet Global Health 6(4), e380–e389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, PH, Creinin, MD, Reeves, MF, Cwiak, C, Espey, E and Jensen, JT (2011) Immediate versus delayed IUD insertion after uterine aspiration. New England Journal of Medicine 364(23), 2208–2217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blanc, AK (2001) The effect of power in sexual relationships on sexual and reproductive health: an examination of the evidence. Studies in Family Planning 32(3), 189–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, SEK and Casterline, JB (2014) Understanding unmet need: history, theory, and measurement. Studies in Family Planning 45(2), 123–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castle, S, Konaté, M, Ulin, P and Martin, S (1999) A qualitative study if clandestine contraceptive use in urban Mali. Studies in Family Planning 30(3), 231–248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conde-Agudelo, A, Rosas-Bermudez, A and Kafury-Goeta, AC (2006) Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes – a meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Association 295(15), 1809–1823.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Curtis, C, Huber, B and Moss, T (2005) Postabortion family planning : addressing the cycle of repeat unintended pregnancy and abortion. International Perpsectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 36(1), 44–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evens, E, Otieno-Masaba, R, Eichleay, M, Mcarraher, DRM, Hainsworth, G, Lane, C et al. (2014) Postabortion care services for youth and adult clients in Kenya: a comparison of services, client satisfaction and provider attitudes. Journal of Biosocial Science 46, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henning, P, Burgess, CK, Jones, HE and Norman, WV (2017) The effects of asking a fertility intention question in primary care settings: a systematic review protocol. Systematic Reviews 6(11), 4–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huber, D (2019) Postabortion care and the voluntary family planning component : expanding contraceptive choices and service options. Global Health Sciences and Practice 7(2), 207–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huber, D, Curtis, C, Irani, L, Pappa, S and Arrington, L (2016) Postabortion care: 20 years of strong evidence on programming components. Global Health Sciences and Practice 4(3), 481–494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huntington, D and Piet-Pelon, NJ (eds) (1999) Postabortion Care: Lessons from Operations Research. Population Council, New York.Google Scholar
International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, International Confederation of Midwives, International Council of Nurses and USAID (2009) Postabortion Family Planning, a Key Component of Postabortion Care: Consensus Statement. URL: http://www.respond-project.org/pages/files/6_pubs/advocacy-materials/PAC-FP-Joint-Statement-November2013-final.pdf (accessed 23rd September 2020).Google Scholar
Johnson, BR, Ndhlovu, S, Farr, SL and Chipato, T (2002) Reducing unplanned pregnancy and abortion in Zimbabwe through postabortion contraception. Studies in Family Planning 33(2), 195–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson-Hanks, J (2004) Uncertainty and the second space : modern birth timing and the dilemma of education. European Journal of Population 20, 351–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarraher, DRM, Chen-Mok, M, Oronoz, AS, Brito-Anderson, S, Grey, T, Tucker, H and Bailey, PE (2010) Meeting the needs of adolescent postabortion care patients in the Dominican Republic. Journal of Biosocial Science 42, 493–509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDougall, J, Fetters, T, Clark, KA and Rathavy, T (2009) Determinants of contraceptive acceptance among Cambodian abortion patients. Studies in Family Planning 40(2), 123–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nanda, G, Schuler, SR and Lenzi, R (2013) The influence of gender attitudes on contraceptive use in Tanzania: new evidence using husbands’ and wives’ survey data. Journal of Biosocial Science 45, 331–344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearson, E, Kanti, K, Andersen, KL, Moreau, C, Surkan, PJ and Decker, MR (2017) Correlates of contraceptive use 4 months postabortion: findings from a prospective study in Bangladesh. Contraception 95(3), 279–287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rasch, V and Lyaruu, MA (2005) Unsafe abortion in Tanzania and the need for involving men in postabortion contraceptive counseling. Studies in Family Planning 36(4), 301–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rusibamayila, A, Phillips, JF, Kalollela, A, Jackson, E and Baynes, C (2017) Factors influencing pregnancy intentions and contraceptive use: an exploration of the ‘ unmet need for family planning ’ in Tanzania. Culture, Health and Sexuality 19(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savelieva, I, Pile, JM, Sacci, I and Loganathan, R (2003) Postabortion Family Planning Operations Research Study in Perm, Russia. Washington, DC. URL: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/268376314 (accessed 1st December 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Say, L, Chou, D, Gemmill, A, Tunçalp, Ö, Moller, A, Daniels, J et al. (2014) Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Global Health 2(6), 323–333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schuler, SR, Rottach, E and Mukiri, P (2011) Gender norms and family planning decision-making in Tanzania: a qualitative study. Journal of Public Health in Africa 2(2), 102–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sedgh, G, Singh, S and Hussain, R (2014) Intended and unintended pregnancies worldwide in 2012 and recent trends. Studies in Family Planning 45(3), 301–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shah, IH and Ahman, E (2010) Unsafe abortion in 2008: global and regional levels and trends. Reproductive Health Matters 18(36), 90–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shah, IH, Santhya, KG and Cleland, J (2015) Postpartum and post-abortion contraception: from research to programs. Studies in Family Planning 46(4), 343–353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Srivastava, A and Thomson, SB (2009) Framework analysis: a qualitative methodology for applied policy research. Journal of Administration & Governance 4(2), 72–79.Google Scholar
Stanback, J and Twum-Baah, KA (2001) Why do family planning providers restrict access to services? An examination in Ghana. International Family Planning Perspectives 27(1), 37–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokols, D (1992) Establishing and maintaining healthy environments: toward a social ecology of health promotion. American Psychologist 47(1), 6–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tripney, J, Kwan, I and Bird, KS (2013) Postabortion family planning counseling and services for women in low-income countries: a systematic review. Contraception 87(1), 17–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turner, KL and Corbett, MR (2003). Essential elements of postabortion care: origins, evolution and future directions. International Family Planning Perspectives 29(3), 106–111.Google Scholar
USAID (2011) Postabortion Family Planning: Strengthening the Family Planning Component of Postabortion Care. High Impact Practices in Family Planning (HIP). USAID, Washington DC.Google Scholar
USAID (2019) Post-Abortion Family Planning: A Critical Component of Postabortion Care. High Impact Practices in Family Planning (HIP). USAID, Washington DC. URL: https://www.fphighimpactpractices.org/briefs/postabortion-family-planning/ (accessed 1st November 2019).Google Scholar
Wegs, C, Creanga, AA, Galavotti, C and Wamalwa, E (2016) Community dialogue to shift social norms and enable family planning: an evaluation of the family planning results initiative in Kenya. PLoS One 11(4), e0153907.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WHO (2008) Unsafe Abortion Incidence and Mortality: Global and Regional Levels in 2008 and Trends during 1990–2008. World Health Organization, Geneva.Google Scholar
Zavier, AJF and Padmadas, SS (2012) Postabortion contraceptive use and method continuation in India. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 118, 65–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed