Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:04:00.414Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MARITAL FERTILITY AND INCOME: MODERATING EFFECTS OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS RELIGION IN UTAH

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2012

JOSEPH B. STANFORD  and
KEN R. SMITH
JOSEPH B. STANFORD
Affiliation:
Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah, USA
KEN R. SMITH
Affiliation:
Department of Family and Consumer Studies, University of Utah, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Utah has the highest total fertility of any state in the United States and also the highest proportion of population affiliated with the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (the LDS or Mormon Church). Data were used from the 1996 Utah Health Status Survey to investigate how annual household income, education and affiliation with the LDS Church affect fertility (children ever born) for married women in Utah. Younger age and higher education were negatively correlated with fertility in the sample as a whole and among non-LDS respondents. Income was negatively associated with fertility among non-LDS respondents. However, income was positively correlated with fertility among LDS respondents. This association persisted when instrumental variables were used to address the potential simultaneous equations bias arising from the potential endogeneity of income and fertility. The LDS religion's pronatalist stance probably encourages childbearing among those with higher income.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , March 2013 , pp. 239 - 248
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abma, J. C., Chandra, A., Mosher, W. D., Peterson, L. S. & Piccinino, L. J. (1997) Fertility, family planning, and women's health: new data from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth. Vital and Health Statistics. Series 23: Data from the National Survey of Family Growth, 1–114.Google Scholar
Adsera, A. (2006) Marital fertility and religion in Spain, 1985 and 1999. Population Studies 60, 205–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adsera, A. (2007) Reply to the note by Neuman ‘Is fertility indeed related to religiosity?’. Population Studies 61, 225–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baerlocher, M. O. (2007) Fertility rates and gross national incomes per capita. Canadian Medical Association Journal 177, 846.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balakrishnan, T. (1993) Family and Childbearing in Canada. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, pp. 92–104.Google Scholar
Becker, G. (1991) A Treatise on the Family. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heaton, T. B. (1986) How does religion influence fertility? The case of Mormons. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 25, 248–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hotz, V. J., Klerman, J. A. & Willis, R. (1997) The economics of fertility in developed countries. In Rosenzweig, M. R. & Stark, O. (eds) Handbook of Population and Family Economics. New York, Elsevier, pp. 275–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosmin, B. A. & Lachman, S. P. (1993) One Nation Under God. Religion in Contemporary American Society. Harmony Books, New York.Google Scholar
McIntosh, J. (1999) An analysis of reproductive behaviour in Canada: results from an intertemporal optimizing model. Journal of Population Economics 12, 451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, J., Hamilton, B., Sutton, P., Ventura, S., Menacker, F. & Munson, M. (2005) Births: Final Data for 2003. National Vital Statistics Reports, CDC.Google Scholar
Merrill, R. M., Lyon, J. L., & Jensen, W. J. (2003) Lack of a secularizing influence of education on religious activity and parity among Mormons. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 42, 113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myrskyla, M., Kohler, H. P. & Billari, F. C. (2009) Advances in development reverse fertility declines. Nature 460, 741–743.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skirbekk, V. (2008) Fertility trends by social status. Demographic Research 18, 145–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Census (2000) US Census Bureau: State and County QuickFacts. URL: http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/49000.html (accessed 29th April 2011).Google Scholar
Utah Health Status Survey (1998) Overview of the 1996 Health Status Survey. URL: http://health.utah.gov/opha/publications/1996hss/over/hssover.html (accessed 29th April 2011).Google Scholar
Van Bavel, J. (2006) The effect of fertility limitation on intergenerational social mobility: the quality–quantity trade-off during the demographic transition. Journal of Biosocial Science 38, 553–569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed