Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T01:38:17.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is there a relationship between childlessness and marriage breakdown?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Robert Chester
Robert Chester
Affiliation:
Department of Social Administration, University of Hull
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The common belief that childlessness is positively associated with instability of marriage derives from official statistics which appear to show higher divorce rates for childless than for fertile couples. The official findings are a procedural artifact, however, and the relationship shown is certainly exaggerated and possibly spurious.

The appropriate strategy in determining whether divorcees are relatively infertile is to find a population with disrupted marriages and measure its fertility experience. In doing so it is necessary to take note of the definition of fertility, the remarriage factor, and (most importantly) the duration of marriage. The official statistics use the conception of legal duration of marriage. Since this ignores separation before divorce, its use exaggerates the infertility of divorcees, as does failure to exclude remarriages. De facto duration of marriage (wedding to separation) is a superior statement of opportunity to conceive, and calculations on this basis eliminate or even reverse the fertility differential between divorcing and stable couples. Local figures are used to illustrate this effect, and the finding is supported by evidence from a sample of marriages ending in legal proceedings lesser than divorce. It is concluded that the alleged relationship between childlessness and instability of marriage is probably either non-existent or the reverse of that normally assumed, and that in any case measurement of the net overall effect of childlessness does not provide a helpful datum. An alternative strategy of research is suggested, which would seek patterns of effect rather than net overall effect, taking heed of relevant variables, and also considering all forms of marital breakdown including marriages in which cohabitation continues only with disharmony.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 4 , Issue 4 , October 1972 , pp. 443 - 454
Copyright
Copyright © 1972, Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chester, R. (1971a) The duration of marriage to divorce. Br. J. Sociol. 22, 174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chester, R. (1971b) Contemporary trends in the stability of English marriage. J. biosoc. Sci. 3, 389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chester, R. (1972a) Some characteristics of marriages of brief duration. Med. Gynaecol. & Sociol. 6, 9.Google Scholar
Chester, R. (1972b) Current incidence and trends in marital breakdown. Postgrad. med. J. 48, 529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Day, L.H. (1964) Patterns of divorce in Australia and the United States. Am. Sociol. Rev. 29, 509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dominian, J. (1968) Marital Breakdown. Penguin Books, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Farmer, M. (1970) The Family. Longmans, London.Google Scholar
Fletcher, R. (1966) The Family and Marriage in Britain. Penguin Books, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
General Register Office (1961) Census. Fertility Tables. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
General Register Office (1964) Registrar General's Statistical Review of England and Wales. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
General Register Office (1966) Registrar General's Statistical Review of England and Wales. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Hicks, M.W. & Platt, M. (1970) Marital happiness and stability: a review of research in the sixties. J. Marriage and Fam. 32, 553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphrey, M. (1969) The Hostage Seekers. Longmans, London.Google Scholar
Jacobson, P.H. (1950) Differentials in divorce by duration of marriage and size of family. Am. Sociol. Rev. 15, 235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johns, E.A. (1965) The Social Structure of Modern Britain. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Kephart, W.M. (1954) The duration of marriage. Am. Sociol. Rev. 19, 287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinsey, A.C., Pomeroy, W.B., Martin, C.E. & Gebhard, P.H. (1953) Sexual Behaviour in the Human Female. Saunders, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Klein, J. (1968). Samples from English Cultures, 2 vols. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Marsden, D. (1969) Mothers Alone. Allen Lane, London.Google Scholar
McGregor, O.R., Blom-Cooper, L. & Gibson, C. (1970) Separated Spouses. Duckworth, London.Google Scholar
Monahan, T.P. (1952) How stable are remarriages? Am. J. Sociol. 58, 280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monahan, T.P. (1955) Is childlessness related to family stability? Am. Sociol. Rev. 20, 446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monahan, T.P. (1958) The changing nature and instability of remarriages. Eugen. Q. 5, 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowntree, G. & Carrier, N. (1958) The resort to divorce in England and Wales 1858–1957. Popul. Stud. 11, 188.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1965) The Sexual Behaviour of Young People. Longmans, London.Google Scholar
Slater, E. & Woodside, M. (1951) Patterns of Marriage. Cassell, London.Google Scholar
Turner, C. (1969) Family and Kinship in Modern Britain. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Walker, K. & Whitney, O. (1965) The Family and Marriage in a Changing World. Gollancz, London.Google Scholar