Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T14:14:27.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Incidence of hysterectomy and tubal ligation in public hospitals in South Australia, 1980–82

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Farhat Yusuf  and
Dora K. Briggs
Farhat Yusuf
Affiliation:
School of Economic and Financial Studies, Macquarie University, Sydney
Dora K. Briggs
Affiliation:
School of Education, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This paper presents information on the incidence of hysterectomy and tubal ligation in South Australia in the period 1980–82, and on the age, marital status and ethnicity of women undergoing these procedures in public hospitals during the period. A typical woman undergoing one of these procedures was married or previously married and in her mid-40s for hysterectomy or mid-30s for tubal ligation. South Australian women had a lifetime chance of one in six of undergoing hysterectomy and of one in five of undergoing tubal ligation. The findings are consonant with the suggestion that increasing numbers of women are choosing forms of sterilization as means of contraception.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , October 1988 , pp. 453 - 459
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amirikia, H. & Evans, T. N. (1979) Ten-year review of hysterectomies: trends, indications and risks. Am. J. Obstet. Gynec. 134, 341.Google Scholar
Easterday, C., Charles, L., Grimes, D. A. & Riggs, J. A. (1983) Hysterectomy in the United States. Obstet. Gynec. 62, 203.Google ScholarPubMed
Haynes, D. M. & Martin, B. J. (1979) Caesarean hysterectomy: a twenty-five-year review. Am. J. Obstet. Gynec. 34, 393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laros, R. K. & Work, B. A. (1975) Female sterilization. III. Vaginal hysterectomy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynec. 122, 693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leeton, J., McNicot, K. & Selwood, T. (1980) A follow-up survey of family planning methods in general practice in Victoria. Aust. Fam. Physician, 9, 477.Google ScholarPubMed
New South Wales Department of Health (1985) Differential Practice of Discretionary Surgery in New South Wales. Information Bulletin No. 4, New South Wales Department of Health, Sydney.Google Scholar
Office of the Australian Government Actuary (1985) Australian Life Tables, 1980–82. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.Google Scholar
Opit, L. J. & Gadiel, D. (1982) Hysterectomy in New South Wales: An Evaluation of its Use and Outcome. Office of Health Care Finance, Sydney.Google Scholar
Royal College of General Practitioners (1974) Oral Contraceptives and Health. Pitman, London.Google Scholar
Royal College of General Practitioners (1981) The oral contraceptive study: oral contraceptive and gall bladder disease. Lancet, i, 541.Google Scholar
Savage, W. (1982) Taking liberties with women: abortion, sterilization and contraception. Int. J. Hlth Services, 12, 293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shapiro, T. M., Fisher, W. & Diana, A. (1983) Family planning and female sterilization in the United States. Social Sci. Med. 17, 1847.Google Scholar
Young, C. M. & Ware, H. (1979) Contraceptive use in Australia. Aust. N.Z. J. Obstet. Gynaec. 19, 1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yusuf, F. & Briggs, D. K. (1979) Legalized abortion in South Australia: the first 7 years' experience. J.biosoc. Sci. 11, 179.Google Scholar
Yusuf, F. & Briggs, D. K. (1985) Trends in legalized abortion in South Australia: 1970–81. J biosoc. Sci. 17, 215.Google Scholar