Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:56:47.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

HINDU–MUSLIM FERTILITY DIFFERENTIAL IN INDIA: A COHORT APPROACH

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2016

Samba Siva Rao Pasupuleti ,
Prasanta Pathak  and
Santosh Jatrana
Samba Siva Rao Pasupuleti*
Affiliation:
Population Studies Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata, India
Prasanta Pathak
Affiliation:
Sampling and Official Statistics Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata, India
Santosh Jatrana
Affiliation:
Centre for Social Impact Swinburne, Faculty of Business & Law, Swinburne University of Technology, Victoria, Australia
*
1 Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Hindus and Muslims together account for 94% of the population of India. The fertility differential between these two religious groups is a sensitive and hotly debated issue in political and academic circles. However, the debate is mostly based on a period approach to fertility change, and there have been some problems with the reliability of period fertility data. This study investigated cohort fertility patterns among Hindus and Muslims and the causes of the relatively higher level of fertility among Muslims. Data from the three National Family Health Surveys conducted in India since the early 1990s were analysed using a six-parameter special form of the Gompertz model and multiple linear regression models. The results show a gap of more than 1.3 children per woman between those Muslim and Hindu women who ended/will end their reproductive period in the calendar years 1993 to 2025. The socioeconomic and demographic characteristics of Muslims explain 31.2% of the gap in fertility between Muslims and Hindus, while the desire for more children among Muslims explains an additional 18.2% of the gap in fertility.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 49 , Issue 2 , March 2017 , pp. 147 - 172
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press, 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adsera, A. (2006) Marital fertility and religion in Spain, 1985 and 1999. Population Studies 60(2), 205–221.Google Scholar
Aschengrau, A. & Seage, G. R. (2008) Essentials of Epidemiology in Public Health, 2nd edition. Jones & Bartlett Publishers.Google Scholar
Balasubramanian, K. (1984) Hindu–Muslim differentials in fertility and population growth in India: role of proximate variables. Artha vijñāna 26, 189.Google Scholar
Basu, A. M. (1996) The demographics of religious fundamentalism. In Basu, K. & Subrahmanyam, S. (eds) Unravelling the Nation: Sectarian Conflict and India’s Secular Identity. Penguin Books, New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
Bhagat, R. & Praharaj, P. (2005) Hindu–Muslim fertility differentials. Economic and Political Weekly 40(5), 411–418.Google Scholar
Bhat, P. (1995) On the quality of birth history data collected in National Family Health Survey 1992–93. Demography India 24(2), 245–258.Google Scholar
Bhat, P. M. (2005) Trivialising religion: causes of higher Muslim fertility. Economic and Political Weekly 40(13), 1376–1379.Google Scholar
Bhat, P. M. & Zavier, A. F. (2005) Role of religion in fertility decline: the case of Indian Muslims. Economic and Political Weekly 40(5), 385–402.Google Scholar
Bongaarts, J. & Feeney, G. (1998) On the quantum and tempo of fertility. Population and Development Review 24(2), 271–291.Google Scholar
Borooah, V. K. & Iyer, S. (2005) Religion, literacy, and the female-to-male ratio. Economic and Political Weekly 40(5), 419–427.Google Scholar
Brooks, C. & Bolzendahl, C. (2004) The transformation of US gender role attitudes: cohort replacement, social-structural change, and ideological learning. Social Science Research 33(1), 106–133.Google Scholar
Caldwell, J. C. (1986) Routes to low mortality in poor countries. Population and Development Review 12(2), 171–220.Google Scholar
Chamie, J. (1977) Religious differentials in fertility: Lebanon, 1971. Population Studies 31(2), 365–382.Google Scholar
Cowan, S. K. (2013) Cohort abortion measures for the United States. Population and Development Review 39(2), 289–307.Google Scholar
Davis, K. (1946) Human fertility in India. American Journal of Sociology 52(3), 243–254.Google Scholar
Dharmalingam, A., Navaneetham, K. & Morgan, S. P. (2005) Muslim–Hindu fertility differences: evidence from National Family Health Survey-II. Economic and Political Weekly 40(5), 429–436.Google Scholar
Frejka, T. & Westoff, C. F. (2008) Religion, religiousness and fertility in the US and in Europe. European Journal of 24(1), 5–31.Google Scholar
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) (1995) National Family Health Survey (MCH and Family Planning), India 1992–93. IIPS, Mumbai.Google Scholar
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) & Macro International (2007) India National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005–06. IIPS, Mumbai.Google Scholar
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) & ORC Macro (2000) National Family Health Survey (NFHS-2), 1998–99: India. IIPS, Mumbai.Google Scholar
James, K. & Nair, S. B. (2005) Accelerated decline in fertility in India since the 1980s: trends among Hindus and Muslims. Economic and Political Weekly 40(5), 375–383.Google Scholar
Jeffery, P. & Jeffery, R. (2002) A population out of control? Myths about Muslim fertility in contemporary India. World Development 30(10), 1805–1822.Google Scholar
Jeffery, R. & Jeffery, P. (2000) Religion and fertility in India. Economic and Political Weekly 35(35/36), 3253–3259.Google Scholar
Jeffery, R. & Jeffery, P. (2005) Saffron demography, common wisdom, aspirations and uneven governmentalities. Economic and Political Weekly 40(5), 447–453.Google Scholar
Joshi, A. P., Srinivas, M. & Bajaj, J. (2003) Religious Demography of India. Centre for Policy Studies, Chennai, India.Google Scholar
Krishnaji, N. & James, K. (2005) Religion and fertility: a comment. Economic and Political Weekly 40(5), 455–458.Google Scholar
Mistry, M. (1999) Role of religion in fertility and family planning among Muslims in India. Indian Journal of Secularism 3(2), 1–33.Google Scholar
Moulasha, K. & Rao, G. R. (1999) Religion-specific differentials in fertility and family planning. Economic and Political Weekly 34(42/43), 3047–3051.Google Scholar
Ní Bhrolcháin, M. (1992) Period paramount? A critique of the cohort approach to fertility. Population and Development Review 18(4), 599–629.Google Scholar
Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner (2015) C-1 Population by Religious Community, Census of India, 2011. Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, New Delhi. URL: http://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011census/C-01.html (accessed 15th December 2015).Google Scholar
Ongaro, F. (2001) Transition to adulthood in Italy. In Corijn, M. & Klijzing, E. (eds) Transition in Adulthood in Europe. Kluwer Academic Publisher, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Operations Research Group (1971) Family Planning Practices in India: The First All-India Survey Report. ORG, Baroda.Google Scholar
Operations Research Group (1983) Family Planning Practices in India: Second All-India Survey. ORG, Baroda.Google Scholar
Operations Research Group (1990) Family Planning Practices in India: Third All-India Survey, Vol II. ORG, Baroda.Google Scholar
Pasupuleti, S. S. & Pathak, P. (2010a) Spatial and temporal changes in fertility behavior of Indian women cohorts. Genus 66(3), 69–92.Google Scholar
Pasupuleti, S. S. & Pathak, P. (2010b) Special form of Gompertz model and its application. Genus 66(2), 95–125.Google Scholar
Pasupuleti, S. S., Pathak, P. & Chattopadhyay, A. K. (2012) Spatial and temporal changes in the dynamics of tubal sterilization practice in India. Paper presented at the Population Association of America Annual Meeting 2012, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, C. & Nowak, V. (2001) Transition to adulthood in Austria. In Corijn, M. & Klijzing, E. (eds) Transition in Adulthood in Europe. Kluwer Academic Publisher, the Netherland.Google Scholar
Reddy, P. (2003) Religion, population growth, fertility and family planning practice in India. Economic and Political Weekly 38(33), 3500–3509.Google Scholar
Retherford, R. D. & Mishra, V. K. (2001) An evaluation of recent estimates of fertility trends in India. National Family Health Survey Subject Reports, No. 19. IIPS, Mumbai.Google Scholar
Rothman, K. J. & Greenland, S. (1998) Modern Epidemiology, 2nd Edition. Lippincott–Raven, USA.Google Scholar
Ryder, N. B. (1965) The cohort as a concept in the study of social change. American Sociological Review 30(6), 843–861.Google Scholar
SAS Institute (2005) The GLIMMIX Procedure. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Shariff, A. (1995) Socio-economic and demographic differentials between Hindus and Muslims in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 2947–2953.Google Scholar
Spoorenberg, T. (2010) Fertility transition in India between 1977 and 2004: analysis using parity progression ratios. Population-E 65(02), 315–332.Google Scholar
Stoker, L. & Jennings, M. K. (2008) Of time and the development of partisan polarization. American Journal of Political Science 52(3), 619–635.Google Scholar
Visaria, L. (1974) Religious differentials in fertility. In Bose, A. (ed.) Population in India’s Development: 1947–2000. Vikas Publishing House, Delhi.Google Scholar
Weeks, J. R. (1988) The demography of Islamic nations. Population Bulletin 43(4), 5–54.Google Scholar
Weisberg, H. I. (2010) Bias and Causation: Models and Judgment for Valid Comparisons. Wiley Hoboken, NJ.Google Scholar
Westoff, C. F. & Frejka, T. (2007) Religiousness and fertility among European Muslims. Population and Development Review 33(4), 785–809.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. (2008) Religious affiliation, religiosity, and male and female fertility. Demographic Research 18(8), 233–262.Google Scholar