Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:29:13.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of an unsuccessful sex Preselection clinic in Singapore

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Nancy E. Williamson
Affiliation:
Population Council, Tagbilaran City, Philippines
T. H. Lean
Affiliation:
Clinic 33, Malayan Credit House, 96 Somerset Road, Singapore
D. Vengadasalam
Affiliation:
Kandang Kerbau Hospital, Singapore

Summary

This paper evaluates a Singapore experiment to test the Shettles ‘rhythm and douche’ method of sex control. The clinic was set up in the hope that if couples could have the son they desired, they would keep their families small in accordance with the goverment's strong commitment to population control. From March 1975 to July 1977, 10,000 newly-wed women were invited to attend the clinic. A thousand women, not all newlyweds, attended at least once. Of the 31 women who had definite sex preferences, who attempted to follow the method, and who gave birth between March 1975 and November 1977, all wanted boys. By chance alone, one would expect about sixteen to have boys. In fact, fourteen had boys. Only six of the 31 women reported using the method completely correctly.

Women attending the clinic at least once were more likely to have an outside job, to have a husband with a professional or managerial job, and to be of Chinese origin compared with the Singapore population. Clients coming either had fertility problems and had no sex preferences or wanted a boy. Of those coming at least once, 70% had no previous children; the rest had had 403 girls and 58 boys.

To test this sex control technique adequately, one would need a large sample of highly committed couples who are given intensive counselling and follow-up. This particular method appears to be impractical on a mass basis, apart from questions about its effectiveness. Other sex control methods currently under research may prove more practical and effective. A better solution would be to discourage boy preference and improve the opportunities for girls.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bloodworth, D. (1974) Lee Kuan Yew: male chauvinism is to blame. People, 1, 10.Google Scholar
De Grouchy, J. & Trébuchet, C. (1971) Transfusion foeto-maternelle de lymphocytes sanguine et detection du sexe du foetus. Ann. genet. 14, 133.Google Scholar
Goldstein, A.I., Lukesh, R.B. & Ketchum, M. (1973) Prenatal sex determination by fluorescent staining of the cervical smear for the presence of a Y chromosome: an evaluation. Am. J. Obstet. Gynec. 155, 866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosset, L., Barrelet, V. & Odartchenko, N. (1974) Antenatal fetal sex determination from maternal blood during early pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynec. 120, 60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grumbach, M.M. (1969) Big step in sex prediction. Science News, 96, 76.Google Scholar
Grumbach, M.M. (1970) Boy or girl? A new pre-birth test can tell. Good Housekeeping, 170, 139.Google Scholar
Guerrero, R. (1974) Association of the type and time of insemination within the menstrual cycle with human sex ratio at birth. New Engl. J. Med. 291, 1056.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guerrero, R. (1975a) Type and time of insemination within the menstrual cycle and the human sex ratio. Stud. Fam. Plann. 6, 367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guerrero, R. (1975b) Timing intercourse can alter sex ratio but there's a catch. Fam. Plann. Perspect. 7(2), 58.Google Scholar
Hatzold, O. (1973) X or Y? Sex selection prior to conception—between Utopia and reality. Sexualmedizin, 2, 430. (Translated into English by IBRD Language Services Division, 04 9th, 1974.)Google Scholar
Hatzold, O. (1977) Sohn oder Tochter. Leitfaden für die Anwendung der Zeitwahlmethode zur Geschlectsbestimmung. Lehmanns, Munich.Google Scholar
Intercom (1977) Sex preselection in China. Intercom, 5, No. 4, 7. Population Reference Bureau, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Khoo, C.K., Piah, H.S.B.H.M. & Lim, K.L. (1975) Births and Deaths and Marriages. Department of Statistics, Republic of Singapore.Google Scholar
Khoo, C.K. (1976/1977) Yearbook of Statistics, Singapore 1976/77. Department of Statistics, Republic of Singapore.Google Scholar
Manuel, M., Park, I.J. & Jones, H.W. Jr. (1974) Prenatal sex determination by fluorescent staining of cells for the presence of Y chromatin. Am. J. Obstet. Gynec. 119, 853.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ministry Of Labour (1976) Report on the Labour Force Survey of Singapore. Singapore.Google Scholar
Rinehart, W. (1975) Sex preselection not yet practical. Popul. Rep. 1, 21.Google Scholar
Rorvick, D.M. & Shettles, L.B. (1970a) You can choose your baby's sex. Look, 21st 04, 88.Google Scholar
Rorvick, D.M. & Shettles, L.B. (1970b) Your Baby's sex: Now You Can Choose. Dodd, Mead, New York.Google Scholar
Séguy, B. (1975) Les methods de sélection naturelle et volontaires des sexes. J. Gynéc. obstét. Biol. Repord. 4, 145.Google Scholar
Stattman, E. (1975) Boy or girl. Honolulu Sunday Advertiser and Star Bulletin, 25th 08.Google Scholar
Whelan, E.M. (1977) Boy or Girl? The Sex Selection Technique that Makes All Others Obsolete. Bobbs-Merrill, New York.Google Scholar
Williamson, N.E. (1976) Sons or Daughters? A Cross-cultural Survey of Parental Preferences. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, Ca.Google Scholar
Williamson, N.E. (1978) Boys or Girls? Parents' Preferences and Sex Control. Population Bulletin, Population Reference Bureau, Washington, DC.Google ScholarPubMed