Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T21:12:36.711Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EFFECTS OF A FORMAL TRAINING PROGRAMME ON CONSANGUINEOUS MARRIAGES ON HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS' KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES: AN INTERVENTIONAL STUDY FROM TURKEY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2009

AHMET NESIMI KISIOGLU ,
AHMET RIFAT ORMECI ,
ERSIN USKUN ,
MUSTAFA OZTURK  and
KURTULUS ONGEL
AHMET NESIMI KISIOGLU
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey
AHMET RIFAT ORMECI
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey
ERSIN USKUN
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey
MUSTAFA OZTURK
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey
KURTULUS ONGEL
Affiliation:
Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Consanguineous marriage is traditionally common throughout the eastern Mediterranean region. Research has suggested that it is closely linked to the sociocultural and socioeconomical status of individuals, and education plays a critical role in decreasing the number of cases. This study aimed to determine the effects of a formal training programme on consanguineous marriages on the knowledge of, and attitudes towards, consanguineous marriage of high school students (n=804) in the Mediterranean region of Turkey. Seniors from three randomly selected public high schools participated in the pre-test and post-test design study. To determine the effects of the programme, students who received the training were compared with those who did not receive any formal training about the subject. After the post-tests were administered, data were collected and analysed using chi-squared and McNemar tests. The results showed significant differences in knowledge and attitudes among the students who had received the formal training programme and those who had not. In addition, the results indicated potential peer influence between the students who received training in consanguineous marriage and those who did not.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 42 , Issue 2 , March 2010 , pp. 161 - 176
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bener, A., Hussain, R. & Teebi, A. S. (2007) Consanguineous marriages and their effects on common adult diseases: studies from an endogamous population. Medical Principles and Practice 16(4), 262–267.Google Scholar
Bittles, A. (2001) Consanguinity and its relevance to clinical genetics. Clinical Genetics 60(2), 89–98.Google Scholar
Editorial (1991) Consanguinity and health. Lancet 338, 85–86.Google Scholar
Erdal, S. O. & Ongel, K. (2003) Promoting Learner-Centered Instruction Through the Use of Cooperative and Inquiry Learning Strategies. ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED 479308.Google Scholar
Erdal, S. O., Taskin, B. C. & Gunhan, C. B. (2006) Developing a self-efficacy scale towards the use of mathematics in teaching science: a validity and reliability study. Mid-Western Educational Research Association Conference, 11–14th October 2006, Columbus, OH, USA.Google Scholar
Gunaid, A. A., Hummad, N. A. & Tamim, K. A. (2004) Consanguineous marriage in the capital city Sana'a, Yemen. Journal of Biosocial Science 36(1), 111–121.Google Scholar
Güz, K., Dedeoğlu, N. & Lüleci, G. (1989) The frequency and medical effects of consanguineous marriages in Antalya, Turkey. Hereditas 111(1), 79–83.Google Scholar
Hancıoğlu, A. & Tunçbilek, E. (1998) Consanguineous marriage, sociodemographic features and effects on child deaths. Turkish Journal of Pediatrics 41, 139–153.Google Scholar
Kisioglu, A. N., Ozturk, M., Uskun, E. & Ormeci, A. R. (2005) Socio-demographic properties of consanguineous marriages in Isparta Province, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Public Health 3(2), 80–83.Google Scholar
Koballa, T. R. & Crawley, F. E. (1985) The influence of attitude on science teaching and learning. School Science and Mathematic 85, 222–232.Google Scholar
Meyer, B. F. (2005) Strategies for the prevention of hereditary diseases in a highly consanguineous population. Annals of Human Biology 32(2), 174–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council (1996) National Science Education Standards. National Academies Press, Washington DC, USA.Google Scholar
Ulusoy, M. & Tunçbilek, E. (1987) Consanguineous marriage and the effects on child deaths in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Population Studies 9(7), 26.Google Scholar
Zakzouk, S. (ed.) (2002) Consanguinity and hearing impairment in developing countries: a custom to be discouraged. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 116, 811–816.Google Scholar