Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T14:39:25.273Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Birth weight and sibship size

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

William H. James
William H. James
Affiliation:
Galton Laboratory, University College London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It seems that women whose first-born children are very heavy (9 lb and more) or very light (less than 5 1b) have more subsequent children than other women. This finding does not appear to arise from any of the possible artifacts discussed, and it could have some bearing on the present secular increase in the height and weight of the population.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , April 1972 , pp. 227 - 234
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashford, J.R., Fryer, J.G. & Brimblecombe, F.S.W. (1969) Secular trends in late foetal deaths etc. Br. J. prev. soc. Med. 23, 154.Google Scholar
Birmingham Working Party (1962) A diabetes survey. Br. med. J. i, 1497.Google Scholar
Boyne, A.W. (1960) In: Human Growth. Edited by Tanner, J. M.. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Boyne, A.W. & Leitch, I. (1954) Secular change in the height of British adults. Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 24, 255.Google ScholarPubMed
Butler, N.R. & Bonham, D.G. (Eds.) (1963) Perinatal Mortality. Livingstone, London.Google Scholar
Camilleri, A.P. & Cremona, V. (1970) The effect of parity on birthweight. J. Obstet. Gynaec. Br. Commonw. 77, 145.Google Scholar
Casa, D. & Lun, M.T. (1970) II peso neonatale nelle fratrie di gemelli. Acta Genet. med. Gemell. 19, 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, P.R. (1967) The demographic characteristics of Britain today and their implications. Eugen. Rev. 59, 222.Google Scholar
Damon, A. & Thomas, R.B. (1967) Fertility and physique—height, weight and ponderal index. Hum. Biol. 39, 5.Google ScholarPubMed
Douglas, J.W.B. (1950) Some factors associated with prematurity. J. Obstet. Gynaec. Br. Emp. 57, 143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fraccaro, M. (1955) A contribution to the study of birth weight based on an Italian sample. Ann. hum. Genet. 20, 282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraccaro, M. (1958) Data for quantitative genetics in man. Birth weight in official statistics. Hum. Biol. 30, 142.Google ScholarPubMed
Gruenwald, P. (1966) Growth of the human fetus. Am. J. Obstet. Gynec. 94, 1120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Illsley, R. (1967) The sociological study of reproduction and its outcome. In: Childbearing, its Social and Psychological Aspects. Edited by Richardson, S. A. and Guttmacher, A. F.. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Illsley, R. & Kincaid, J.C. (1963) Social correlations of perinatal mortality. In: Perinatal Mortality. Edited by Butler, N. R. and Bonham, D. G.. Livingstone, London.Google Scholar
James, W.H. (1969) Birth weight and birth order. Ann. hum. Genet. 32, 411.Google Scholar
James, W.H. (1972) Coital rate and dizygotic twinning. J. biosoc. Sci. 4, 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joint Committee of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and the Population Investigation Committee (1948) Maternity in Great Britain. Oxford University Press, London.Google Scholar
Karn, M.N. & Penrose, L.S. (1951) Birth weight and gestation time in relation to maternal age, parity and infant survival. Ann. Eugen. 16, 147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khosla, T.H. & Lowe, C.R. (1968) Height and weight of British men. Lancet, i, 742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C.-C. (1948) Birth weights of full term infants in West China. China med. J. 66, 153.Google ScholarPubMed
Loeb, J. (1958) Weight at birth and survival of newborn by age of mother and total-birth order: U.S., early 1950. National Office of Vital Statistics Special Reports 47, No. 2.Google Scholar
McKeown, T. & Record, R.G. (1957) An examination of fertility of women following pregnancy according to height and weight. Br. J. prev. soc. Med. 11, 102.Google ScholarPubMed
Middleton, G.D. & Caird, F.L. (1968) Parity and diabetes mellitus. Br. J. prev. soc. Med. 22, 100.Google ScholarPubMed
Millis, J. & You Poh, Seng (1954) The effect of age and parity of the mother on birth weight of the offspring. Ann. hum. Genet. 19, 58.Google Scholar
Poon-King, T., Henry, M.V. & Rampersad, F. (1968) Prevalence and natural history of diabetes in Trinidad. Lancet, i, 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Registrar General of England and Wales (1951) Classification of occupations 1950. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Sach, R.A. (1969) The large infant. Am. J. Obstet. Gynec. 104, 195.Google Scholar
Selvin, S. & Janerich, D.T. (1971) Four factors influencing birth weight. Br. J. prev. soc. Med. 25, 12.Google Scholar
Tanner, J. (1968) Maturation in man. Scient. Am. 218, 21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomson, A.M., Billewicz, W.Z. & Hytten, F.E. (1968) The assessment of foetal growth. J. Obstet. Gynaec. Br. Commonw. 75, 903.Google Scholar
Walker, J.B. & Kerridge, D. (1961) Diabetes in an English community, Leicester. (Quoted by Poon-King et al., 1968.)Google Scholar