Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:57:16.829Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ASSOCIATION BETWEEN AGE AT MENARCHE AND EARLY-LIFE NUTRITIONAL STATUS IN RURAL BANGLADESH

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2008

ALINDA M. BOSCH
Affiliation:
Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute, the Netherlands
FRANS J. WILLEKENS
Affiliation:
Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute, the Netherlands
ABDULLAH H. BAQUI
Affiliation:
Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA Centre for Health and Population Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh
JEROEN K. S. VAN GINNEKEN
Affiliation:
Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute, the Netherlands
INGE HUTTER
Affiliation:
Population Research Centre, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands

Summary

Age at menarche is associated with anthropometry in adolescence. Recently, there has been growing support for the hypothesis that timing of menarche may be set early in life but modified by changes in body size and composition in childhood. To evaluate this, a cohort of 255 girls aged <5 years recruited in 1988 were followed up in 2001 in Matlab, Bangladesh. The analysis was based on nutritional status as assessed by anthropometry and recalled age at menarche. Data were examined using lifetable techniques and the Cox regression model. The association between nutritional status indicators and age at menarche was examined in a multivariate model adjusting for potential confounding variables. Censored cases were accounted for. The median age at menarche was 15·1 years. After controlling for early-life predictors (birth size, childhood underweight, childhood stunting) it appeared that adolescent stunting stood out as the most important determinant of age at menarche. Adolescent stunting still resonates from the effect of stunting in early childhood (OR respectively 2·63 (p<0·01 CI: 1·32–5·24) and 8·47 (p<0·001 CI: 3·79–18·93) for moderately and severely stunted under-fives as compared with the reference category). Birth size was not a significant predictor of age at menarche. It is concluded that age at menarche is strongly influenced by nutritional status in adolescence, notably the level of stunting, which is in turn highly dependent on the level of stunting in early childhood. A ‘late’ menarche due to stunting may be detrimental for reproductive health in case of early childbearing because of the association between height and pelvic size.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)