Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:51:15.278Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Artificial Insemination by Donor: a Survey of Attitudes and Knowledge in Medical Students and Infertile Couples

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Sandra R. Leiblum  and
Christopher Barbrack
Sandra R. Leiblum
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, UMDNJ-Rutgers Medical School, New Jersey, USA
Christopher Barbrack
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Medical students and members of infertile couples were questioned about their knowledge and attitudes toward artificial insemination using donor semen (AID). While both groups were well-informed about AID, considerable attitudinal diversity existed. Subjects generally favoured AID for infertile couples, for single women and for situations where the risk of inheritable retardation or genetic disease existed. Members of infertile couples were more positive about AID than were medical students, and females were more positive than males. The results indicate continued controversy regarding several aspects of AID such as whether to permit AID recipients to select their own donor and whether children conceived through AID should be so informed. The implications for infertility counselling are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , April 1983 , pp. 165 - 172
Copyright
Copyright © 1983, Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Behrman, S.J. (1979) Artificial insemination. Clin, obstet. Gynec. 22, 245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Currie-Cohen, M., Luttrell, L. & Shapiro, S. (1980) Current practice of artificial insemination by donor in the United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 300, 585.Google Scholar
David, A. & Avidan, D. (1976) Artificial insemination donor: clinical and psychologic aspects. Fert. Steril. 27, 528.Google Scholar
Farris, I.J. & Garrison, M. (1954) Emotional impact of successful donor insemination. Obstet. Gynec. 3, 19.Google Scholar
Francoeur, R.J. (1970) Utopian Motherhood. Doubleday, New York.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. (1951) Social variables in acceptance or rejection of artificial insemination. Am. sociol. Rev. 16, 85.Google Scholar
Karp, L.E. (1981) Artificial insemination: a need for caution. Am. J. med. Genet. 9, 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraus, J. & Quinn, P.E. (1977) Human artificial insemination. Some social and legal issues. Med. J. Aust. 1, 710.Google Scholar
Langer, G., Lemberg, E., & Scharf, M. (1969) Artificial insemination: a study of 156 successful cases. Int. J. Fert. 14, 232.Google ScholarPubMed
Ledward, R.S., Crawford, L. & Symonds, E.M. (1979) Social factors in patients for artificial insemination by donor (AID). J. biosoc. Sci. 11, 473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levie, L.H. (1967) An inquiry into the psychological effects of artificial insemination with donor semen. Eugen. Rev. 59, 97.Google Scholar
McCormack, M., Leiblum, S. & Lazzarini, A. (1983) Attitudes regarding utilization of artificial insemination by donor in Huntington's disease. Am. J. med. Genet. (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vernon, G.M. & Broadway, J.A. (1959) Attitudes toward artificial insemination and some variables associated therewith. Marriage & Fam. Liv. 21, 43.Google Scholar
Watters, W.W. & Sousa-Poza, J. (1966) Psychiatric aspects of artificial insemination (donor). Can. med. Ass. J. 95, 106.Google ScholarPubMed