Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:16:22.646Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An investigation of the age at menopause

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Sonja McKinlay
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, University of Aberdeen; Department of Medical Sociology, Bedford College, University of London; and MRC Medical Sociology Unit, University of Aberdeen
Margot Jefferys
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, University of Aberdeen; Department of Medical Sociology, Bedford College, University of London; and MRC Medical Sociology Unit, University of Aberdeen
Barbara Thompson
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, University of Aberdeen; Department of Medical Sociology, Bedford College, University of London; and MRC Medical Sociology Unit, University of Aberdeen

Extract

Data from a representative sample of 736 women aged 45–54 living in or near London in 1965 were analysed with respect to menopausal status and median and mean age at menopause (final menses). The median age at the natural menopause was 50·78 years. The validity of the measures used and the reliability of the data in this and previous studies are discussed. The conclusions are reached that median age of menopause is a more valid measurement than mean age and that there is no conclusive evidence of an increase in the age at menopause over the last century. The data also indicate understatement of the age at the last menstrual period (LMP) by women, with increasing lapse of time.

The menopause was found to occur markedly later in currently married women than in unmarried or previously married women. When marital status was controlled by considering currently married women only, increased parity was shown to be related to a late menopause among women of higher socio-economic status, but not among those of lower socio-economic status. There was no notable association between the menopause and early or late menarche and socio-economic status.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armitage, P. (1966) The chi-square test for heterogeneity of proportions after adjustment for stratification. Jl R. statist. Soc. B, 28, 150.Google Scholar
Awon, M.P. (1957) Association between climacteric haemorrhage, carcinoma of the body of the uterus and diabetes mellitus. J. Obstet. Gynaec. Br. Emp. 64, 50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Backman, G. (1948) Die Beschleunigte Entwicklung der Jugend. Acta Anat. 4, 421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, F. (1960) The age of the menarche and of the menopause in white South African women and certain factors influencing these times. S. Afr. med. J. 34, 316.Google ScholarPubMed
Burgh, P.R.J. & Gunz, F.W. (1967) The distribution of the menopausal age in New Zealand. An exploratory study. N.Z. med. J. 66, 6.Google Scholar
Corscaden, J.A. & Gusberg, S.B. (1947) Background of cancer of corpus. Am. J. Obstet. Gynec. 53, 419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Currier, A.F. (1897) The Menopause. Appleton, New York.Google Scholar
Finney, D.J. (1952) Probit Analysis, 2nd edn.Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
Fluhmann, C.F. (1944) Hormonal relations of menopausal symptoms. J. clin. Endocr. 4, 586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frommer, D.J. (1964) Changing age of the menopause. Br. med. J. ii, 349.Google Scholar
Goldberg, M.B. (1959) Medical Management of the Menopause, Mod. Med. Monographs, 17. Grune & Stratton, New York.Google Scholar
Gray, P.G. (1955) The memory factor in social surveys. J. Am. statist. Ass. 50, 344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, Von G.A., Muller, Th., Valaer, M., Erb, H., Obiri, J.A., Remen, U. & Vanaanen, P. (1961) Der Zusammenhang Zwischen gynakologischen Krankheiten und dem Menopausalter. Gynaecologia (Basel), 152, 270.Google Scholar
Jaszmann, L., VanLith, N.D. & Zaat, J.C.A. (1969) The age at menopause in the Netherlands. Int. J. Fert. 14, 106.Google Scholar
Kay, A. & Bach, F. (1965) Subfertility before and after the development of rheumatoid arthritis in women. Ann. rheum. Dis. 24, 169.Google Scholar
MacMahon, B. & Worcester, J. (1966) Age at Menopause. National Center for Vital and Health Statistics Series 11, No. 19, Washington.Google ScholarPubMed
McKinlay, S.M., Jefferys, M. & Thompson, B. (1972) A menopausal syndrome (In preparation).Google Scholar
Medical Women's Federation (1933) An investigation of the menopause in one thousand women. Lancet, i, 106.Google Scholar
Neugarten, B.L. & Kraines, R.J. (1965) Menopausal symptoms in women of various ages. Psychosom. Med. 27, 266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newton, M. & Odom, P.L. (1964) The menopause and its symptoms. Sth. med. J., Nashville, 57, 1309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norris, C.C. (1919) The menopause. An analysis of two hundred cases. Am. J. Obstet. 79, 767.Google Scholar
Rogers, J. (1956) The menopause. New Engl. J. Med. 254, 697.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanes, K.I. (1918) The age of menopause: A statistical study. Trans. Sect. Obstet. Gynec. Abd. Surg., Amer. med. Ass. 258.Google Scholar
Soberon, J., Calderon, J.J. & Goldzieher, J.W. (1966) Relation of parity to age at menopause. Am. J. Obstet. Gynec. 96, 96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanner, J.M. (1962) Growth at Adolescence, 2nd edn.Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.Google Scholar
Tilt, E.J. (1857) The Change of Life in Health and Disease. Churchill, London.Google Scholar
Way, S. (1954) Aetiology of carcinoma of the body of the uterus. J. Obstet. Gynaec. Br. Emp. 61, 46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed