Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T15:08:29.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ADVOCATING MULTI-DISCIPLINARITY IN STUDYING COMPLEX EMERGENCIES: THE LIMITATIONS OF A PSYCHOLOGICAL APPROACH TO UNDERSTANDING HOW YOUNG PEOPLE COPE WITH PROLONGED CONFLICT IN GAZA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2004

GILLIAN LEWANDO HUNDT ,
DAWN CHATTY ,
ABDEL AZIZ THABET  and
HALA ABUATEYA
GILLIAN LEWANDO HUNDT
Affiliation:
University of Warwick
DAWN CHATTY
Affiliation:
Refugee Studies Centre, University of Oxford
ABDEL AZIZ THABET
Affiliation:
School of Public Health, AlQuds University
HALA ABUATEYA
Affiliation:
University of Leicester
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper looks at the limitations and strengths of using the A-cope questionnaire for measuring strategies for coping with prolonged conflict by Palestinian young people in Gaza. The scale was administered to young people between the ages of 8 and 17. The results show some gender differences in coping strategies. However, some items on the subscales are not relevant for Muslim societies or societies in situations of prolonged conflict. The authors suggest that combining an anthropological contextual perspective and qualitative data with psychological instruments is an effective way of addressing the limitations of using a single quantitative method of assessment in non-Western complex social and cultural settings.

Type
Regular Articles
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 36 , Issue 4 , July 2004 , pp. 417 - 431
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)