Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:22:00.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Labor Expenditures and Benefit-Cost Accounting in Times of Unemployment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2015

Robert H. Haveman  and
Scott Farrow
Robert H. Haveman
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin - Madison
Scott Farrow
Affiliation:
UMBC
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We summarize procedures for assessing the benefits and costs of using labor inputs in public projects. Examples are provided to illustrate how information on labor inputs can be analyzed and presented such that, should the analyst choose, labor services generate elements of both benefit and cost in times of high unemployment; however, this is not generally correct in times of full employment. Our analysis is consistent with the overall goal of identifying those projects which are estimated to improve efficiency—those with social benefits in excess of social costs.

Keywords

laborunemploymentsurplustax
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , 25 April 2011 , pp. 1 - 9
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis 2011

References

CBO (Congressional Budget Office), “Estimated Impact of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act on Employment and Economic Output From April 2010 Through June 2010,” Congressional Budget Office Publication No. 4201, August, 2010. Available at http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/117xx/doc11706/08-24-ARRA.pdf.Google Scholar
Boardman, A., Greenberg, D., Vining, A. and Weimer, D., Cost-Benefit Analysis, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 2011.Google Scholar
Greenberg, D., “The Leisure Bias in Cost-Benefit Analysis of Employment Training Programs,” The Journal of Human Resources, 32(2):413-439, 1997.Google Scholar
Harberger, A., “On Measuring the Social Opportunity Cost of Labor,” in Benefit-Cost Analysis-1971, ed. Harberger, A., Haveman, R., Margolis, J., Niskanen, W., Turvey, R. and Zeckhauser, R., Aldin-Atherton, Chicago, 1971.Google Scholar
Haveman, R. and Krutilla, J., “Unemployment, Excess Capacity, and Benefit-Cost Criteria,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 49(3): 382-392, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krutilla, K., “Using the Kaldor-Hicks Tableau Format for Cost-Benefit Analysis and Policy Evaluation,” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(4):864-875, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OMB (U.S. Office of Management and Budget), “Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit-Cost Analysis of Federal Programs” OMB Circular A-94, Washington, D.C., 1992.Google Scholar
OMB (U.S. Office of Management and Budget), “Regulatory Analysis,” OMB Circular A-4, Washington, D.C., 2003.Google Scholar