Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T11:13:23.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cost-benefit analyses of sprinklers in nursing homes for elderly

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2013

Henrik Jaldell
Henrik Jaldell*
Affiliation:
Karlstad University – Economics, Universitetsgatan 1 Karlstad 651 88, Sweden
*
Henrik Jaldell, Karlstad University – Economics, Universitetsgatan 1 Karlstad 651 88, Sweden[email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The risk of dying in fires in nursing homes is six times the risk of dying in fires at home in Sweden. One way to reduce this risk is to install fire sprinklers. This study measures the benefits using value of full lives, life years and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) for deaths and injuries. The results show that sprinklers are cost-effective in newly built nursing homes no matter what value of life is used. However, if sprinklers are installed in already existing buildings, they are cost-effective only if the value of a statistical life is used.

Keywords

elderlyfire safetyQALYvalue of life
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , 01 August 2013 , pp. 209 - 235
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis 2013

References

Alberini, A., Cropper, M. L., Krupnick, A., & Simon, N. (2004). Does the value of a statistical life vary with age and health status? Evidence from the U.S. and Canada. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 48, 769–792.Google Scholar
Aldy, J. E., & Viscusi, W. K. (2007). Age differences in the value of statistical life: revealed preference evidence. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 1(2), 241–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, C. P., Rosenberg, M., Mossberg, K., Holzer, C., Blakeney, P., Robert, R., Thomas, C., & Meyer, W. (2008). Relationship between the quality of life questionnaire (QLQ) and the SF-36 among young adults burned as children. Burns, 34, 1163–1168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borglin, G., Jakobsson, U., Edberg, A-K., & Rahm-Hallberg, I. (2006). Older people in Sweden with various degrees of present quality of life: their health, social support, everyday activities and sense of coherence. Health and Social Care in the Community, 14(2), 136–146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bron, M. S., & Hay, J. (2001). Cost-effectiveness of artificial skin substitute vs. allograft for burn patients. Value in Health, 4(2), 118.Google Scholar
Burström, K., Johannesson, M., & Diederichsen, F. (2001a). Swedish population health-related quality of life results using the EQ-5D. Quality of Life Research, 10, 621–635.Google Scholar
Burström, K., Johannesson, M., & Diederichsen, F. (2001b). Health-related quality of life by disease and socio economic group in the general population in Sweden. Health Policy, 55(1), 51–69.Google Scholar
Butry, D. T. (2009). Economic performance of residential fire sprinkler systems. Fire Technology, 45(1), 117–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsson, F., Daruvala, D., & Jaldell, H. (2010a). Preferences for lives, injuries, and age: a stated preference survey. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42, 1814–1821.Google Scholar
Carlsson, F., Daruvala, D., & Jaldell, H. (2010b). Value of statistical life and cause of accident: A choice experiment. Risk Analysis, 30(6), 975–986.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chilton, S., Covey, J., Hopkins, L., Jones-Lee, M., Loomes, G., Pidgeon, N., & Spencer, A. (2002). Public perceptions of risk and preference-based values of safety. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 25(3), 211–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cropper, M., Aydede, S., & Portney, P. (1994). Preferences for life saving programs: how the public discounts time and age. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 8(3), 243–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desaigues, B., Ami, D., Bartczak, A., Braun-Kohlová, M., Chilton, S., Czajkowski, M., Farreras, V., Hunt, A., Hutchison, M., Jeanrenaud, C., Kaderjak, P., Máca, V., Markiewicz, O., Markowska, A., Metcalf, H., Navrud, S., Nielsen, J.S., Ortiz, R., Pellegrinig, S., Rabl, A., Riera, R., Scasny, M., Stoeckel, M.-E., Szántó, R., & Urban, J. (2011). Economic valuation of air pollution mortality: a 9-country contingent valuation survey of value of life year (VOLY). Ecological Indicators, 11, 902–910.Google Scholar
Dolan, P., & Edlin, R. (2002). Is it really possible to build a bridge between cost-benefit analysis and cost-effectiveness-analysis? Journal of Health Economics, 21(5), 827–843.Google Scholar
Dolan, P., Shaw, R., Tsuchiya, A., & Williams, A. (2005). QALY maximization and people’s preferences: a methodological review of the literature. Health Economics, 14, 197–208.Google Scholar
Donaldson, C., Baker, R., Mason, H., Pennington, M., Bell, S., Lancsar, E., Jones-Lee, M., Wildman, J., Robinson, A., Bacon, P., Olsen, J. A., Gyrd-Hansen, D., Kjaer, T., Bech, M., Seested Nielsen, J., Persson, U., Bergman, A., Protière, C., Moatti, J. P., Luchini, S., Pinto Prades, J. L., Mataria, A., Khatiba, R., Jarallah, Y., van Exel, J., Brouwer, W., Topór-Madry, R., Kozierkiewicz, A., Poznanski, D., Kocot, E., Gulácsi, L., Péntek, M., Manca, A., & Kharroub, S. (2010). European Value of a Quality Adjusted Life Year. SP5A-CT-2007-044172, Available at: http://research.ncl.ac.uk/eurovaq/. Accessed on 15 April, 2013.Google Scholar
Duncan, C. R., Wade, C. A., & Saunders, N. M. (2000). Cost effective domestic fire sprinkler systems, research report. Wellington: New Zealand Fire Service Commission Research Report No. 1.Google Scholar
Ebrahim, S., Brittis, S., & Wu, A. (1991). The valuation of states of ill-health: the impact of age and disability. Age Ageing, 20, 37–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
European Commission. (2001). Recommended interim values for the value of preventing a fatality in Directorate Generale Environment cost benefit analysis. Availble at: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/enveco/others/pdf/recommended_interim_values.pdf. Accessed on 15 April, 2013.Google Scholar
European Commission. (2011). PRESS RELEASE Consumers: EU move to reduce cigarette ignited fires to save hundreds of lives each year. Reference IP/11/1342, Date 14/11/2011.Google Scholar
FEMA. (1999). Fire risks for older adults. Available at: http://www.usfa.fema.gov/downloads/pdf/publications/older.pdf. Accessed on 15 April, 2013. United States Fire Administration.Google Scholar
Gros, S., Spackman, M., & Carter, S. (2010). A cost benefit analysis of options to reduce the risk of fire and rescue in areas of new build homes. Fire Research Series 1/2010. United Kingdom: Department for Communities and Local Government.Google Scholar
Hagberg, M., Hagberg, B., & Savemann, B.-I. (2002). The significance of personality factors for various dimensions of life quality among older people. Aging and Mental Health, 6(2), 178–185.Google Scholar
Hall, J. R. Jr. (2010). U.S. Experience with sprinklers and other automatic fire extinguishing equipment. February, National Fire Protection Association.Google Scholar
Halvorsrud, L., & Kalfoss, M. (2007). The conceptualization and measurement of quality of life in older adults: a review of empirical studies published during 1994–2006. European Journal of Ageing, 4, 229–246.Google Scholar
Hammit, J. K. (2007). Valuing changes in mortality risk: lives saved versus life years saved. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 1(2), 228–240.Google Scholar
Harmathy, T. Z. (1988). On the economics of mandatory sprinklering of dwellings. Fire Technology, 24(3), 245–261.Google Scholar
Hellström, Y., Andersson, M., & Hallberg, I. R. (2004). Quality of life among older people in Sweden receiving help from informal and/or formal helpers at home or in special accommodation. Health and Social Care in the Community, 12(6), 504–516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
HHS. (2008). Final rule. Medicare and medicaid programs; fire safety requirements for long term care facilities, automatic sprinkler systems. Centers for medicare and medicaid services (CMS), Department of Health and Human Services, 73 (157).Google Scholar
Hultkrantz, L., & Svensson, M. (2012). The value of statistical life in Sweden: A review of the empirical literature. Health Policy, 108, 302–310.Google Scholar
Hunger, M., Thorand, M. B., Schunk, M., Döring, A., Menn, P., Peters, A., & Holle, R. (2011). Multimorbidity and health-related quality of life in the older population: results from the German KORA-Age study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 9, 53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
IRTAD. (2010). International Traffic Safety Data and Analysis Group Annual Report 2010. Available at: http://www.irtad.net. Accessed on 15 April, 2013.Google Scholar
Johannesson, M. (2001). Should we aggregate relative or absolute changes in QALYs. Health Economics, 10, 573–577.Google Scholar
Johannesson, M., & Johansson, P.-O. (1997). Is the valuation of a QALY gained independent of age? Some empirical evidence. Journal of Health Economics, 16, 589–599.Google Scholar
Johansson, P.-O. (2002). On the definition and age-dependency of the value of a statistical life. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 25(3), 251–263.Google Scholar
Johansson-Stenman, O., & Martinsson, P. (2008). Are some lives more valuable? An ethical preferences approach. Journal of Health Economics, 27(3), 739–752.Google Scholar
Jones-Lee, M. W. (1989). The economics of safety and physical risk. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Juås, B. (1994). Sprinkler och automatlarm, Forskningsrapport 94:4, Karlstad University. [In Swedish: Title English translation: Sprinklers and automatic alarms].Google Scholar
Kaarlola, A., Tallgren, M., & Pettilä, V. (2006). Long-term survival, quality of life, and quality-adjusted life-years among critically ill elderly patients. Critical Care Medicine, 34(8), 2120–2126.Google Scholar
Krupnick, A. (2007). Mortality-risk valuation and age: stated preference evidence. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 1(2), 261–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krupnick, A., Alberini, A., Cropper, M., & Simon, N., (2002). Age, health and the willingness to pay for mortality risk reductions: a contingent valuation survey of Ontario residents. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 24(2), 161–186.Google Scholar
Lancsar, E., Wildman, J., Donaldson, C., Ryan, M., & Baker, R. (2011). Deriving distributional weights for QALYs through discrete choice experiments. Journal of Health Economics, 30(2), 466–478.Google Scholar
Leiter, A. M. (2011). Age effects in monetary valuation of reduced mortality risks: the relevance of age-specific hazard rates. European Journal of Health Economics 12, 331–344.Google Scholar
Mason, H., Jones-Lee, M., & Donaldson, C. (2009). Modelling the monetary value of a Qaly: a new approach based on UK data. Health Economics, 18, 933–950.Google Scholar
McMillan, J. (2002). Allocation of resources. Surgery (Oxford), 20(5), 117–120.Google Scholar
Melinek, S. J. (1993). Potential value of sprinklers in reducing fire casualties. Fire Safety Journal 20, 275–287.Google Scholar
Miller, T. R., Romano, E. O., & Spicer, R. S. (2000). The cost of childhood unintentional injuries and the value of prevention. The Future of Children, 10(1), 137–163.Google Scholar
Mostue, B. A., & Stensaas, J. P. (2002). Effekt av boligsprinkler i omsorgsboliger, Norges branntekniske laboratorium as, Sintef rapport, NBLA02117 [In Norwegian: Title= Efficiency of sprinklers in nursing homes]Google Scholar
MSB (2008). Bränders samhällsekonomiska kostnader – beräkningar, I99-193/08, SwedishCivil Contingencies Agency. [Title in English: Costs for fires – calculations]Google Scholar
NBHW (2001). Vad är särskilt i särskilt boende för äldre? En kartläggning, Tabell 11. The National Board of Health and Welfare (Socialstyrelsen). [Title in English: What is special in special housing for elderly? A survey]Google Scholar
NBHW (2010). Nationella riktlinjer för diabetesvården 2010, The National Board of Health and Welfare (Socialstyrelsen). [Title in English= National guidelines for diabetes care]Google Scholar
Nord, E. (1996). Health status index models for use in resource allocation decisions. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 12(1), 31–44.Google Scholar
Nord, E., Pinto-Prades, J. L., Richardson, J., Menzel, P., & Ubel, P. (1999). Incorporationg societal concerns for fairness in numerical valuation of health programmes. Health Economics, 8, 25–39.Google Scholar
Nystedt, F. (2003). Deaths in residential fires – An analysis of appropriate fire safety measures, Brandteknik, 106, Faculty of Engineering, Lund University.Google Scholar
OECD (2011). Valuing mortality risk reduction in regulatory analysis of environmental, health and transport policies: policy implications. Paris.Google Scholar
Pearce, D. W. (2000). Valuing risks to life and health. towards consistent transfer estimates in the European union and accession states. Working paper, University College London.Google Scholar
Pinto-Prades, J. L., Loomes, G., & Brey, R. (2009). Trying to estimate a monetary value for the QALY. Journal of Health Economics, 28(3), 553–562.Google Scholar
Richardson, L. R. (2007). Fire losses in selected property classifications of non-residential, commercial and residential wood buildings. Part 1: hotels/motels and care homes for aged, Fire and Materials, 31, 97–123.Google Scholar
Sanchez, J.-L. A., & Bastida, J. L. (2002). Cost-utility analysis applied to the treatment of burn patients in specialized center. Archives of Surgery, 142, 50–57.Google Scholar
Savage, I. (1993). An empirical investigation into the effect of psychological perceptionson the willingness-to-pay to reduce risk. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 6, 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SIKA (2009). Värden och metoder för transportsektorns samhällsekonomiska analyser – ASEK 4, SIKA Rapport, 2009:3. [Title in English: Values and methods for economic analyses in the transport sector].Google Scholar
Sullivan, M., Karlsson, J., & Taft, C. (2002). SF-36 hälsoenkät – Swedish manual and interpretation guide (2nd ed). Gothenburg: Sahlgrenska University Hospital.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. (2004). Life, life-years and willingness to pay. Columbia Law Review, 104(1), 205–252.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. (2002). Effectiveness of fire safety components and systems. Journal of Fire Protection Engineering, 12, 63.Google Scholar
Tsuchiya, A. (1999). Age-related preferences and age weighting health benefits. Social Science & Medicine, 48(2), 267–276.Google Scholar
Tseng, S.-Z., & Wang, R.-H. (2001). Quality of life and related factors among elderly nursing Home residents in Southern Taiwan. Public Health Nursing 18(5), 304–311.Google Scholar
Ubel, P., Richardson, J., & Pinto Prades, J.-L. (1999). Life-saving treatments and disabilities, Are all QALYs treated equal. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 15(4), 738–748.Google Scholar
Viscusi, W. K. (2009). The devaluation of life. Regulation and Governance, 3, 103–127.Google Scholar
Williams, C., Fraser-Mitchell, J., Campbell, S., & Harrison, R. (2004). Effectiveness of sprinklers in residential premises. BRE Report No 204505. United Kingdom: Building Research Establishment.Google Scholar