Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:01:07.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Accounting for systematic risk in benefit-cost analysis: a practical approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2015

Jason Hansen
Affiliation:
Naval Postgraduate School – Defense Resources Management Institute, CA, USA
Jonathan Lipow*
Affiliation:
Naval Postgraduate School – Defense Resources Management Institute, CA, USA
*
Jonathan Lipow, Naval Postgraduate School – Defense Resources Management Institute, 699 Dyer Road, Code 64, Monterey, CA, 93933, USA, Tel: +831.656.3233, Fax: +831.656.2139, e-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Circular A-94 specifies how analysts should discount costs and benefits of government projects, and thus how to account for risk. In this paper, we argue that the methods mandated by A-94 properly account for non-systematic and term risk, but not for systematic risk. A numerical example illustrates how improper accounting for systematic risk produces misleading results and social welfare loss. We conclude by proposing a simple modification of A-94’s procedures that would allow analysts to at least partially account for systematic risk.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis 2013

References

Abel, A. (1999). Risk premia and term premia in general equilibrium. Journal of Monetary Economics, 43(1), 333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazelon, C., & Smetters, K. (1999). Discounting inside the Washington DC beltway. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(4), 213228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brealey, R. A., & Myers, S. C. (1991). Principles of corporate finance (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.Google Scholar
Breeden, D. T. (1979). An intertemporal asset pricing model with stochastic consumption and investment opportunities. Journal of Financial Economics, 7(3), 265296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, D. F., & Zerbe, R. O. (2011). Appropriate discounting for benefit-cost analysis. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 2(2), 118.Google Scholar
Evans, D. J. (2005). The elasticity of marginal utility of consumption: estimates for 20 OECD countries. Fiscal Studies, 26(2), 197224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, R. J. (2012). Is US Economic Growth Over? Faltering Innovation Confronts the Six Headwinds (Working Paper No. 18315). National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w18315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markowitz, H. (1952). The utility of wealth. The Journal of Political Economy, 60(2), 151158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, F. P. (1928). A mathematical theory of saving. The Economic Journal, 38(152), 543559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renze, J., & Weisstein, E. W. (2013). Law of large numbers. Wolfram MathWorld, Retrieved January 4, 2013, from http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LawofLargeNumbers.html.Google Scholar
Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. The Journal of Finance, 19(3), 425442.Google Scholar
Stern, N. H. (2006). Stern review on the economics of climate change. HM Treasury, London. Retrieved from http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/stern_review_report.htm.Google Scholar
U.S. Office of Management and Budget. (1992). Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit-Cost Analysis of Federal Programs (No. A-94 Revised). Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars_a094.Google Scholar
U.S. Office of Management and Budget. (n.d.). Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit-Cost Analysis of Federal Programs Appendix C (No. A-94 Revised). Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars_a094/a94_appx-c.Google Scholar
Varian, H. R. (1992). Microeconomic analysis (3rd ed.). New York: Norton.Google Scholar