Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:23:08.378Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Woman and the Sacred in Ancient Tamilnad

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

George L. Hart III
Get access

Abstract

We possess in ancient Tamil a large body of poetry which antedates for all intents and purposes the incursion of Sanskrit culture into Tamilnad. This poetry, found in the eight anthologies and the Pattuppāṭṭu, dates from the first and second centuries A.D. The culture which produced it was a continuation of the megalithic culture which dominated the Deccan for the millenium before Christ. The special importance of early Tamil poetry for cultural history is that it describes this civilization, which according to the Allchins was characterized by a very conservative and unchanging culture, before it was appreciably influenced by Sanskritic culture from the North. Thus a study of early Tamil reveals elements which were contributed to India by this culture and which were later assimilated by the rest of India. Other sources for this culture—the Sattasaī in Māhārāṣṭrī, for example—show the influence of Sanskrit culture, so that it is not possible to determine from them which elements belonged originally to the Deccan culture and which to the culture of the North.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , February 1973 , pp. 233 - 250
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ai: Ai kurunūṟu.

Ai kurunūṟu. Cmmentator: P. V. Cōmacuntaraṉār. Madras, Kazhagam, 1966.

Ai kurunūṟu. Commentator: Auvai C. Turaicāmipiḷḷai. 3 vols. Annamalai University, 1957-58.

* Ai kurunūṟu Mūlamum Paḻaiyavuraiyum [With old commentary]. Annotator: U. V. Swamina thaier. Fifth edition. Madras, Kapīr Accukkūtam. 1957. Ak.: Akanāṉūṟu.Google Scholar

* Akanāṉūṟu. Commentator: N. M. Vekaṭacạmi Nāttar. Madras, Kazhagam, 1965.

Kur.: Kuṟuntokfai

Kuṟuntokfai, Commentator: P. V. Cōmacuntaraṉār. Madras, Kazhagam, 1965.

* Kuṟuntokai. Commentator: U. V. Swaminathaier. Fourth edition. Madras, Kapīr Accūukktam, 1962.

Puṟ.: Puṟanānūṟu.

Puṟanānūṟu. [With commentary]. Annotator: U. V. Swaminathaier. Sixth Edition. Madras, Kapīr Accukkūtam, 1963.

Puṟanānūṟu. Commentator: Turaicāmianpillai., Auvai C. 2 vols. Madras, Kazhagam, 1964, 1962.Google Scholar

1Allchin, B. and R., The Birth of Indian Civiliza-1957. tion: India and Pakistan before 900 B.C. (Balti-more, Md., 1968), p. 232.Google Scholar

2Swaminathaier, U. V. (editor), manimēkalai (Madras Kapīr Accukkūtam, 1965), 7.75–76.Google Scholar

3Crawley, E., The Mystic Rose (2 volumes New York, 1927), vol. 2, p. 198.Google Scholar

5 The tree causes foes to flee probably because it is a kāval maram, that is, a tutelary tree, a tree which is singled out to symbolize the king's connection with the world of the sacred, and which is guarded at all costs from being cut down by enemies.

6 See also Ai. 404.

7 For example, Ak. 16, 26, 66, 176.

8Westermarck, E., A History of Human Marriage (3 volumes, Fifth Edition, London, 1921), vol. 3, p. 67.Google Scholar

9 Puṟ. 166, 361.

10 Puṟ. 198; Ak. 16, 184.

11 The word for clan here is kuṭi. Ak. 184.

12 Puṟ. 201.

13 See also Puṟ. 122, Ai. 422.

14 See also Puṟ. 341, 350, 352.

15 See also Puṟ. 160, 164, 211, 276.

16 See also Ak. 83; Ai. 203, 303, 322, 327, 328, 360.

17 See below, p. 245.

18 Puṟ. 224, 246, 253, 261, 280.

19 Puṟ. 234, 249.

20 Westermarck, op. cit., vol. i, p. 326.

21The Mahābhārata for the First Time Critically Edited by Sukthankar, Vishnu S., etc. (Poona, 1933–1966).Google Scholar

22Böhtlingk, and Roth, R., Sanskrit-Wörterbuch (7 volumes, St. Petersburg, 1855–75), vol. 4, P. 412.Google Scholar

23Apte, V. S., The Student's English-Sanskrit Dictionary (Delhi, 1964), p. 377.Google Scholar

24 Manusmrti (Nirnayasāgara edition), 11.61, 2.213.

25 Crawley, op. cit., vol. 1, p. 287.

26 lbid., vol. :, p. 287.

27 Ibid., vol. 1, p. 286.

28 Puṟ. 276.

29 Kuṟ. 14, 17, 32, 173, 182, 298.

30 Crawley, op. cit., vol. 1, pp. 308–9.

31 Ibid., vol. i, pp. 300–301. 35 Kuṟ. 218.

32 Puṟ. 120; Kuṟ. 167.

33 Crawley, op. cit., vol. 2, p. 173.

34 Kuṟ. 192.

35 Kuṟ. 218.

36 Crawley, op. cit., vol. 1, p. 307.

37 Ak. 22.

38 ŚatapathabrŚhmana (Weber, editor), 11.5.2.20.

30Keith, A. B., The Religion and Philosophy of the Vedas and Upanishads (Oxford, 1961), p. 265.Google Scholar

40 Śatapathabrāhmana, op. cit., 4.5.9.

41 Mahabādrata, op. cit., 3.61.37–38.

42 Ibid., 9.62.

43Kane, P. V., The History of DharmaŚāstra (5 volumes, Poona, 1930–62), vol. 2, pp. 563ff.Google Scholar

44 Mahābhārata, op. cit., 3.68.

45Atharvaveda (V.V.R.I. edition), 2.615; Ṛgveda (Poona edition), X.40.2.Google Scholar

46 Kane, op. cit., vol. I, p. 135.

47Āpastambadharmasūtra (Bombay Sanskrit Series, edited by Bühler), 11.10.27.5–7.Google Scholar

48 Manusmrti, op. cit., 10.59–61; Mahābhārata, op. cit., 1.111–114.

49 Āpastambadharmasūtra, op. cit., 11.10.27.5–7; Manusmrti, op, cit., 9.64–68.

50 Kane, op. cit., vol. 2, p. 604.

51 Ibid., volume 2, p. 604.

52 Manusmrti, op. cit., 5.157–60.

53Skandapurāna (Vekaṭeśvara Press edition), III, Brahmāranya section, chapter 7, verses 50–51.Google Scholar

54 Kane, op. cit., vol. 2, p. 586; Skandapurāna, op. cit., Kāśīkjiānda, chapter 4.

55 See above, pp. 241–242.

56 Kane, op. cit., vol. 2, p. 586.

57 Ibid., vol. 2, pp. 587ff.

58The Vālmīki-Rāmāyana Critically Edited for the first time by G. H. Bhatt, etc. (Baroda, 1960―), 5.31.12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 21.Google Scholar

59 Ibid., 3.47.

60 Abhij ānaśsākuntalam (Nirnayasāgara edition), act 3.

61 Kane, op. cit., vol. 2, p. 625.

62 Strabo, XV.1.30 and 62.

63 Mahābhārata, op. cit., 1.90.75; 1.116.29.

64 Ibid., 4.22.8.

65 Ibid., 16.8.18.

66Winternitz, M., A History of Indian Literature (translator: S. Ketkar; Calcutta, 1962–1963), vol. 1, p. 444.Google Scholar

67 Kane, op. cit., vol. 2, p. 627; Aparārka on the Yājavalkyasmrti (Ānandāśrama Sanskrit Series edition), p. 112.

68 Fleet, Gupta Inscriptions, p. 91.

69Burrow, T., The Sanskfit Language (London, 1955), pp. 380–88.Google Scholar

70Hart, G. L., Related Cultural and Literary Elements in Ancient Tamil and Jndo-Aryan (A thesis submitted to Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass., 1969). In the second part of this dissertation, I have listed many of the literary conventions and techniques used by Kālidāsa found before in the Tamil anthologies, but not in any Indo-Aryan works which I surveyed. Classical Sanskrit meters which can be shown to be of Dravidian origin include āryā and the other dvipadī meters based on mātrās, and all of the catuspadī meters based on mātrās.Google Scholar