Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T05:42:59.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Translingual World Order: Language without Culture in Post-Russo-Japanese War Japan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2013

Get access

Abstract

This essay examines how Japanese Esperantism developed after the Russo-Japanese War in a manner that departed from the global Esperanto movement. Esperantists viewed Esperanto as a language that amplified the diversity of and symbolized equality between cultures. Esperanto was studied and discussed by elites and nonelites alike in noninstitutional spaces such as in rural homes and coffee shops, often at night, when institutions privileged by state and financial power had closed. By looking at these hidden space-times outside the realms of state guidance, we become privy to an imagination and practice of peace and world order that operated outside the institutions of the nation-state. The history of this movement offers us a rare window into a popular concept of world order in Asia.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Alexander, Agnes Baldwin. 1977. History of the Bahá'í Faith in Japan, 1914–1938. Osaka, Japan: Japan Bahá'í Publishing Trust.Google Scholar
Aoyama, Tomoko. 1999. “Japanese Literary Responses to the Russo-Japanese War.” In The Russo-Japanese War in Cultural Perspective, 1904–05, eds. Wells, David and Wilson, Sandra, 6085. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, Zygmunt. 2003. “Utopia with No Topos.” History of the Human Sciences 16(1):1125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapelier, Emile, and Marin, Gassy. 1908. Anarchists and the International Language, Esperanto. London: Freedom Office.Google Scholar
Chokugen. 1905. “Nihon shinshibatsu no kaibo” [Anatomy of Japan's gentlemen's cliques], 2(8) (March 26).Google Scholar
Crump, John. 1983. The Origins of Socialist Thought in Japan. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Demokurashii. 1919. March–December.Google Scholar
Duara, Prasenjit. 2004. “Introduction: The Decolonization of Asia and Africa in the Twentieth Century.” In Decolonization: Perspectives From Now and Then, ed. Duara, Prasenjit, 120. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engels, Frederick. 1975. “Letter to Bernstein, 22 February 1882.” In Marx, Karl and Engels, Frederick, Collected Works, vol. 46. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
Fine, Robert. 2003. “Kant's Theory of Cosmopolitanism and Hegel's Critique.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 29(6):609–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forman, Michael. 1998. Nationalism and the International Labor Movement: The Idea of the Nation in Socialist and Anarchist Theory. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Forster, Peter G. 1982. The Esperanto Movement. The Hague: Mouton Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujii Shōzō. 1989. Eroshenko no toshi monogatari: 1920-nendai Tokyo, Shanhai, Pekin [Eroshenko's urban stories: Tokyo, Shanghai, Peking in the 1920s]. Tokyo: Misuzu Shobo.Google Scholar
Futabatei Shimei. 1887–88. Ukigumo [The floating cloud]. Tokyo: Kinkōdō.Google Scholar
Futabatei Shimei. 1906. Sekaigo [World language]. Tokyo: Saiunkaku.Google Scholar
Futabatei Shimei. 1966. “Rokoku bungaku no nihon bungaku ni oyoboshitaru eikyō” [The influence of Russian literature on Japanese literature]. In Futabatei Shimei zenshū [The complete works of Futabatei Shimei], vol. 5. Tokyo: Iwanami shoten.Google Scholar
Futabatei Shimei. 1985. Futabatei Shimei zenshū [The complete works of Futabatei Shimei], vol. 5. Tokyo: Chikuma Shobō.Google Scholar
Gaimushō Gaikō Shiryōkan [Japanese Foreign Ministry Archive] (GGSa). Gaikokujin taikyo shobun kankei zoken: bessatsu. Rokoku jin no ichi no bu [Materials relating to the deportation of foreigners: Russian section].Google Scholar
Gaimushō Gaikō Shiryōkan [Japanese Foreign Ministry Archive]. (GGSb). Kageki ha sonota kikken shugisha torishimari kankei zōken. Gaikokujin no bu: Rokokujin bessatsu [Materials concerning the control of dangerous radicals, foreigner section: Russians].Google Scholar
Gallicchio, Mark. 2000. The African American Encounter with Japan and China: Black Internationalism in Asia, 1895–1945. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Hatsushiba Takemi. 1998. Nihon Esperanto Undōshi, Historia de la Esperanto-Movado [History of the Japanese Esperanto movement]. Tokyo: Japana Esperanto Instituto.Google Scholar
Imano Kenzo. 1973. Akita ken rōnō undōshi [History of the labor movement in Akita prefecture]. Akita, Japan: Akita ken rōnō undōshi kankōkai.Google Scholar
Ishikawa Sanshirō. 1978. “Heiminsha jidai no shakai bungei” [Social art of the Heiminsha period]. In Ishikawa Sanshirō chosakushū [Selected works of Ishikawa Sanshirō], vol. 6. Tokyo: Seidōsha.Google Scholar
Japana Esperanto Instituto. 2010. “Japana Esperanto Kongresso: la trajto kaj listo kronologia” [Japan Esperanto Congress: Highlights and chronological list], October 14. http://www.jei.or.jp/hp/materialo/eks_jk.htm (accessed May 5, 2011).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1991. Kant's Political Writings. Edited by Reiss, Hans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konishi Shirō, ed. 1953. Shiryo kindai Nihonshi shakaishugi shiryoshu: Shūkan Heimin Shimbun [Materials on the modern Japanese socialist movement: Shūkan heimin shinbun]. Osaka, Japan: Sogensha.Google Scholar
Konishi, Sho. 2008. “The Absence of Portsmouth in an Early Twentieth-Century Japanese Imagination of Peace.” In The Treaty of Portsmouth and Its Legacies, eds. Ericson, Steven and Hockley, Allen, 98105. Lebanon, N.H.: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Kōtoku Shūsui. 1904a. “The Barbarity of Soldiers.” Shūkan heimin shinbun, no. 14 (February 14).Google Scholar
Kōtoku Shūsui. 1904b. “War Has Broken Out at Last.” Shūkan heimin shinbun, no. 16 (February 21).Google Scholar
Kōtoku Shūsui. 1904c. “Rekkoku funsō no shinsō” [The truth about great power conflict]. Shūkan heimin shinbun, no. 22 (April 3).Google Scholar
Kōtoku Shūsui. 1904d. “Exploitation in Corea.” Shūkan heimin shinbun, no. 39 (August 7).Google Scholar
Kōtoku Shūsui. 1904e. “The Japanese Victory at Liaoyang and National Festivity at Home.” Shūkan heimin shinbun, no. 45 (September 18).Google Scholar
Kōtoku Shūsui. 1906. “Nichibei kankei no shorai” [The future of U.S.-Japan relations]. Nichibei, January 21.Google Scholar
Kōtoku Shūsui. 2004. Teikokushugi [Imperialism]. Tokyo: Iwanami Bunko.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2007. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lins, Ulrich. 1990. La Dangera Lingvo: Studo pri la Persekutoj Kontraû Esperanto [The dangerous language: A study of the persecution of Esperanto]. 2nd ed.Moscow: Progreso.Google Scholar
Lins, Ulrich. 2008. “Esperanto as Language and Idea in China and Japan.” Language Problems and Language Planning 32(1):4760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, Charles S. 2000, June. “Consigning the Twentieth Century to History: Alternative Narratives for the Modern Era.” American Historical Review. http://www.historycooperative.org/journals/ahr/105.3/ah000807.html (accessed June 29, 2009).Google Scholar
Miyake Eiji. 1995. Tatakao Esuperantisutotachi no kisseki: Puroretariya Esuperanto undō no kenkyū [Records of the struggles of Esperantists: A study of proletarian Esperanto]. Osaka, Japan: Riberoisha.Google Scholar
Morgan, Edmund. 1988. Inventing the People: The Rise of Popular Sovereignty in England and America. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Mukai Takashi. 1980. Anakizumu to Esuperanto [Anarchism and Esperanto]. Tokyo: JCA Shuppan.Google Scholar
Müller, Gotelind. 2001. China, Kropotkin und der Anarchismus: Eine Kulturbewegung im China des frühen 20. Jahrhunderts unter dem Einfluss des Westens und japanischer Vorbilder [China, Kropotkin and anarchism: A cultural movement in early twentieth-century China under the influence of the West and Japanese models]. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Müller, Gotelind, and Benton, Gregor. 2006. “Esperanto and Chinese Anarchists, 1907–1920: The Translation from Diaspora to Homeland.” Language Problems and Language Planning 30(1):4573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakamuraya. n.d. “Tenin no seifuku ni rubashika wo saiyō” [Employees wore the rubashka for their uniform]. http://www.nakamuraya.co.jp/100/index.htm (accessed October 31, 2009).Google Scholar
Nihon Esperanto Undō Gojusshūnen Kinen Gyōji Iin Kai. 1956. Nihon Esperanto undō shiryō: Kroniko de la Esperantista Movado en Japanujo [Historical documents from the Japanese Esperanto movement], vol. 1, 1906–1926. Tokyo: Nihon Esperanto Gakkai.Google Scholar
Nojima Yasutarō. 1996. Miyazawa Kenji to Esuperanto [Miyazawa Kenji and Esperanto]. Osaka, Japan: Riberoi.Google Scholar
Oguma Eiji. 2002. A Genealogy of Japanese ‘Self-Images.’ Melbourne: TransPacific Press.Google Scholar
Okamura Tamio and Satō Ryūichi. 2010. Yanagida Kunio, Nitobe Inazō, Miyazawa Kenji: Esuperanto wo Megutte [Yanagida Kunio, Nitobe Inazō, Miyazawa Kenji: Through the lens of Esperanto]. Iwate, Japan: Ihatov Esperanto Association.Google Scholar
Roosevelt, Theodore. 1906. “International Peace.” http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1906/roosevelt-lecture.html (accessed May 1, 2009).Google Scholar
Ryan, Marleigh Grayer. 1965. “Commentary.” In Japan's First Modern Novel: Ukigumo of Futabatei Shimei, Futabatei Shimei, 1190. Translated by Ryan, Marleigh Grayer. New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
Satō Ryūichi. 2004. Sekai no Sakka, Miyazawa Kenji, Esperanto to Ihatov [Writer of the world, Miyazawa Kenji: Esperanto and Ihatov]. Tokyo: Sairyūsha.Google Scholar
Scalapino, Robert, and Yu, George. 1961. The Chinese Anarchist Movement. Berkeley: Center for Chinese Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
Scott, James. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sekai Fujin. 1907–9. Tokyo: Sekaifujinsha.Google Scholar
Sekaijin. 1916 (February–May).Google Scholar
Shea, George T. 1964. Leftwing Literature in Japan. Tokyo: Hosei University Press.Google Scholar
Shūkan Heimin Shinbun, 1904–5.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry Dewitt II. 1972. Japan's First Student Radicals. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stegewerns, Dick. 2007. “Adjusting to the New World: Japanese Opinion Leaders of the Taishō Generation and the Outside World, 1918–1932.” PhD diss., Leiden University.Google Scholar
Stocking, George. 1994. “The Turn of the Century Concept of Race.” Modernism/Modernity 1(1):416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suzuoki Jirō. 1990. Kobe no Esuperanto [Esperanto in Kobe]. Osaka, Japan: Nippon insatsu shuppan.Google Scholar
Suzuoki Jirō. 2002. Nagoya Esuperanto Undō Nenpyō, 1906–1945 [A chronology of the Esperanto movement in Nagoya, 1906–1945]. Kobe, Japan: Kōyū Planning Center.Google Scholar
Takasugi Ichirō. 1997. Hitosuji no midori no shōkei: Yeroshenko wo tazuneru tabi [A journey to discover Eroshenko's green legacy]. Osaka, Japan: Riberoisha.Google Scholar
Tanemaku Hito. 1921–23.Google Scholar
Twine, Nanette. 1991. On Language and the Modern State: The Reform of Written Japanese. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tyrrell, Ian. 1991. Woman's World/Woman's Empire: The Woman's Christian Temperance Union in International Perspective, 1880–1930. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Weitz, Eric D. 2008. “From Vienna to the Paris System: International Politics and the Entangled Histories of Human Rights, Forced Deportations, and Civilizing Missions.” American Historical Review 113(5):1313–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yasuda Toshiaki. 2004. “Language and Ethnicity in Modern Japan.” Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies 4(1):2544.Google Scholar
Yoshino Sakuzō. 1921. “Liberalism in Japan.” In What Japan Thinks, ed. Kawakami, Kiyoshi K., 7992. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar