Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T16:21:08.855Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Dualistic Phenomena in Shang Society

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

Kwang-Chih Chang
Get access

Extract

“The study of ancient China, particularly from the historic period on, requires A the collaboration of historians, archaeologists, palaeographers, as well as specialists in other disciplines.“

Isolated phenomena of a dualistic nature in various Shang institutions have long been recognized (see below), but their interrelationship and their possible relevance to a coherent dualistic system generally prevalent in Shang society cannot be clearly understood unless the various specialists on ancient China break disciplinary boundaries and collaborate with vigor and mutual understanding. This paper attempts to bring attention to some of these phenomena and to define the probable areas of research for a highly important problem in Shang studies. To begin, let us examine some interesting features at the archaeological sites of Hsiao-t'un and Hsi-pei-kang.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , November 1964 , pp. 45 - 61
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Lien-sheng, Yang, “Review of The Archaeology of Ancient China, by Kwang-chih Chang,” American Anthropologist, LXVI (1964), 202Google Scholar.

2 Chang-ju, Shin, “Architectural Remains at Hsiao-t'un,” Archaeologia Sinica, No. 1, Vol. 1, Fasc. I (Taipei, Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica, 1959)Google Scholar.

3 Ssu-yung, Liang and Ch'ü-hsün, Kao, “HPKM1001,” Archaeologia Sinica, No. 3, Vol. 2, in 2 parts (Taipei, Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica, 1962)Google Scholar.

4 Ch'ū-hsün, Kao, “The Royal Cemetery of the Yin Dynasty at Anyang,” Bulletin of the Department of Archaeology and Anthropology, National Taiwan University, Nos. 12/13 (1959) PP.1–2Google Scholar.

5 The names of chao and mu generations are mentioned in Shih Ching, Shu Ching, and Tso Chuan, but descriptions of the system first appear in Li Chi.

6 See, for instance, Granet, Marcel, “Categories matrimoniales et relations de proximité dans la Chine ancienne,” Annales Sociohgiques, ser. B, fasc. 1–3, (Paris, 1939)Google Scholar; Tsung-t'ung, Li, The History of Ancient Chinese Society, (Taipei, The Chinese Commission for Cultural Publications, 1954)Google Scholar, in two volumes; Shun-sheng, Ling, “Origin of the Ancestral Temple in China,” Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica, No. 7, pp. 141–184, (Taipei, 1959)Google Scholar.

7 Li Tsung-t'ung, op. cit., p. 10.

8 Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica, No. 15, pp. 65–95 (Taipei, 1963)Google Scholar.

9 On the problem of naming in the Shang Dynasty, see Tso-pin, Tung, “On the Use of the Ten Day Names for Posthumous Names in the Shang Dynasty,” Ta-lu Tsa-chih, Vol. 2, no. 3, 1951Google Scholar; and Wan-li, Ch'ü, “Origin of the Posthumous Naming System in the Yin Dynasty,” Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica, No. 13 (1948)Google Scholar.

10 Mo-jo, Kuo, “An Interpretation of Chih and Kan,” Studies of Oracle-bone Inscriptions, (Peiping, 1952)Google Scholar.

11 Granet, op. cit.; Li Tsung-t'ung, op. cit.

12 On the lineage system of ancient China, see my “The Lineage System of the Shang and Chou Chinese and Its Political Implications,” unpublished manuscript.

13 Williamson, Robert W., The Social and Political Systems of Central Polynesia (Cambridge University Press, 1924), I, 378–379Google Scholar.

14 On the similarity of many Polynesian institutions to the ancient Chinese, see several recent articles by Shun-sheng, Ling published in the Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnology, (Academia Sinica, Taipei)Google Scholar.

15 McNg-chia, Ch'en, A Comprehensive Description of the Oracle Texts Found at Yin-hsü, (Peiping, 1956)Google Scholar.

16 “Myths and Magic in the Shang Dynasty,” Yenching Journal of Chinese Studies, No. 20, 1936.

17 Chang Kwang-chih, op. cit., in Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnology.

18 Chi, Li, “Eight Types of Hairpins, and the Evolution of their Decorative Patterns,” Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica, No. 30 (1959)Google Scholar; Chi, Li, “Evolution of the White Pottery of the Yin Dynasty,” Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica, No. 38 (1957)Google Scholar.

19 Chi, Li, “The Chronological Relationship Between the Hsiao-t'un Sites and the Hou-chia-chuang Tombs as Seen from the Evolution of the Hair-pins,” Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica, No. 29 (1958)Google Scholar.

20 “The Conservatives and the Progressives in the Yin Institutions,” Ta-lu Tsa-chih, Vol. 6, no. 3, 1953.Google Scholar For detailed documentation, see his monumental monograph, Yin Li P'u, Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica (Lichuang [Szechwan], 1945).

21 For instance, see Ch'en Meng-chia, op. cit. (1956); Shigeki, Kaizuka and Michiharu, Ito, “Re-examination of the Principles of Dating the Bone Inscriptions with Special Reference to Tung Tso-pin's Attribution of Some Bone Inscriptions to the Era of Wen-wu-ting,” The Tōhō Gakuhō, No. 23, (Kyoto, 1953.Google Scholar)

22 See Ch'en Meng-chia, op. cit. (1956); Tsung-yi, Jao, Oracle Bone Diviners of the Yin Dynasty, (Hong Kong University Press, 1959)Google Scholar.

23 Karlgren, Bernhard, “Yin and Chou in Chinese Bronzes,” Bulletin of the Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities. No. 8 (Stockholm, 1936)Google Scholar.

24 “New Studies of Chinese Bronzes,” Bulletin of the Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities, No. 9 (Stockholm, 1937)Google Scholar.

25 Karlgren, 1937, p.72.

26 Ibid., p.75.

27 Karlgren, , “Marginalia on Some Bronze Albums,” Bulletin of the Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities, No. 31 (1959), pp.289–331Google Scholar; “Marginalia on Some Bronze Albums II,” Ibid., No. 32 (1960), pp.321–324; “Some Characteristics of the Yin Art,” Ibid., No. 34 (1962), pp.1–28.

28 Karlgren, 1962, p. 18.

29 Karlgren, 1937, pp. 91–92.

30 This tomb was heavily plundered, and most of the “spectacular” pieces have presumably found their way into various public and private museum collections. We do not know what they were, and cannot speculate about their stylistic classes. On page 3 of the HPKM1001 report, the authors state that three ho vessels described in Umehara's, SuejiSelected Ancient Treasures Found at Anyang, Yin Sites (Kyoto, Kabayashi, 1940)Google Scholar, Plates 44–46, are known to be plundered from HPKM1001. All three of these vessels bear A-type elements, in contrast to the B-type decoration described above. Since we do not know whether these three vessels were indeed from HPKM1001, or which part of HPKM1001 they came from even if they were from this tomb, we can only disregard them in the present discussion.

31 Chi, Li, “Studies in Hsiao-t'un Bronzes,” Chinese Journal of Archaeology, No. 3 (Nanking, 1948)Google Scholar.

32 See footnote 18.

33 Li Chi, “Studies in Hsiao-t'un Bronzes,” Table 13.

34 Shih Chang-ju, op. cit.

35 Li Chi, op. cit. (in footnote 19).

36 Pao-chün, Kuo, Nai, Hsia et al. , Excavation Report of Huei Hsien (Peiping, 1956)Google Scholar.

37 Hsiao-ch'un, Liu, “The Excavations of the Site at Chien-hsi in Meng Hsien, Honan,” Kao-kti 1961, no. i, pp. 33–39Google Scholar.

38 “Shang and Chou Bronzes Unearthed at Erh-lang-p'o in Shih-lou Hsien, Shansi,” Wen-wu Ts'an- k'ao Tzu-liao, 1958, no. 1, p. 36Google Scholar.

39 Chih-hsi, Kao, “Shang Bronzes and Sites at Huang-ts'ai, Ning-hsiang, Hunan,” Kao-ku, 1963, no. 12, pp. 646–648Google Scholar.

40 Chia-yu, Wang, “A Note on the Bronze Artifacts Unearthed at Chu-wa-chieh, in P'eng Hsien, Szechwan,” Wen-wu, 1961, No. 11, pp. 28–31Google Scholar.

41 Hou-hsüan, Hu, “The Feudalistic Institution of the Yin Dynasty,” Chia-kju-hsüeh Shang shih lun tśung, (Tsinan, 1944)Google Scholar.