Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:37:16.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rediscovering Manchuria: Sin Ch'aeho and the Politics of Territorial History in Korea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2010

Andre Schmid
Get access

Extract

In the years immediately prior to Japan's annexation of Korea in 1910, the historian Sin Ch'aeho posed a fundamental challenge to conventional assumptions about the limits of Korean territoriality: was the nation bound to the peninsula or did it more properly extend into the lands of Manchuria? For Sin, the answer was straightforward. Despite writing during the waning years of the Chosŏn dynasty—a time when the court could neither defy Japan's imposition of a protectorate nor resist Japanese pressure for Emperor Kojong to cede the throne, and when thousands in the Righteous Armies (Ŭibyŏng) were dying at the hands of the Japanese military in defense of the peninsula—Sin nevertheless called brazenly for a Korean Manchuria.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 56 , Issue 1 , February 1997 , pp. 26 - 46
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Allen, Chizuko T. 1990. “Northeast Asia Centered Around Korea: Ch'oe Nam-son's View of History.” Journal of Asian Studies 49.4:787–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chosŏn Chŏnsa [A Comprehensive History of Korea]. 1991. 33 vols. Pyŏngyang: Sahoe Kwahagwŏn yŏn'guso.Google Scholar
Committee For The Commemoration Of Sin Ch'aeho. 1980. Tanjae Sin Ch'aeho wa minjok sagwan. Seoul: Hyŏngsŏl ch'ulp'ansa.Google Scholar
Em, Henry. 1995. “Nationalist Discourse in Modern Korea: Minjok as a Democratic Imaginary.” Ph.D. diss., University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Gottman, Jean. 1973. The Significance of Territory. Charlottesville: University of Virgina Press.Google Scholar
Han, Jinchu N and Yufu., Li 1984. “Hanwen ‘minzu’ yici chuxian ji qi chuji shiyong qingkuang” [The First Appearance of the Chinese term ‘Minzu’ and the Situation of its Early Use]. Minzu Yanjiu 2:36–43Google Scholar
Han, Jinchu N and Yufu., Li 1981. “1910 nyŏndae ŭI Sin Ch'aeho ŭi yŏksa insik” [The State of Sin's History During the 1910s]. In Han Ugŭn paksa chŏngnyŏn kinyŏm sahak nonch, ŏng. Seoul: Chisik sanŏpsa.Google Scholar
Han, Jinchu N and Yufu., Li 1989. Chosŏn hugi sahaksa yŏn'gu. [Studies in Late Chosŏn Historiography]. Seoul: Ilchisa.Google Scholar
Han, Jinchu N and Yufu., Li 1993. “Hanmal Sin Ch’aeho ŭi minjokchufŭi saron” [Sin Ch’aeho’s Nationalist History during the Hanmal Period]. In Han’guk minjokchuŭi yŏksahak, edited by Yŏngu, Han. Seoul: Ilchogak.Google Scholar
Han’guk, munhŏn yŏn’guso. 1977. Reprint. Han’guk kaehwagi kyo’gwasŏ ch’ongsŏ [A Compilation of Korean Textbooks from the Kaehwa Period]. Vols. 11–20. Seoul: Asea munhwasa.Google Scholar
Hatada, Takeshi. 1969. Nihonjin no Chosenkan [Japanese Perspectives on Korea]. Tokyo: Keiso shobo.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric, and Ranger., Terence 1983. The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sŭnggi., Hong 1991. “Silchŭng sahangnon” [Empiricist Historiography]. In Hyŏndae Han’guk sahak kwa sagwan, edited by T’aedon, No et a. Seoul: Ilchogak.Google Scholar
Hyŏn, Ch’ae. 1977. Reprint. Yunyŏn Piltok [Essential Reader for Youths]. Vol. 3. Seoul: Han’guk munhŏn yŏn’guso. Original edition 1907.Google Scholar
Hyundai., No date.The History of Korea. Photocopied pamphlet distributed to employees of Hyundai car manufacturing plant, Bromont, Canada.Google Scholar
Kyohŏn., Kim 1946. Reprint. SinTan minsa [A History of Divine Tangun’s People]. Seoul: Sŏul Kong’insa. Original edition 1923.Google Scholar
Tŭkhwang., Kim 1979. “Taeryuk sagwan kwa Manju taeryuk” [Continental Historical Perspective and Manchuria]. Chayu (May):79–82.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich. 1986. “Of Systems, Boundaries and Territoriality: An Inquiry into the Formation of the State System.” World Politics 39 (Oct.):27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledyard, Gari K. 1994. “Cartography in Korea.” In The History of Cartography, edited by Harley, J. B. and Woodward, David. Vol. 2, bk. 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Chae-Jin. 1986. China’s Korean Minority: The Politics of Ethnic Education. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
T’aedon, No. 1991. “Haebanghu minjokchuŭi sahangnon ŭi chŏn’gae” [The Development of Nationalist Historiography in the Postliberation Period]. In Hyŏndae Han’guk sahak kwa sagwan, edited by T’aedon, No, Sunggi, Hong, Hyŏnhŭi, Yi, Kibaek, Yi and Kidong., YiSeoul: Ilchogak.Google Scholar
Ch’angok., Pak 1991. “Chosŏnjok ŭi Chungguk ijusa yŏn’gu” [A Study on the Migratory History of China’s Korean People]. Yŏksa pip’yŏng 15 (Fall): 179–97.Google Scholar
Ch’Ansŭng., Pak 1994. “Pundan sidae namHan ŭi Han’guk sahak” [Korean Historiography During the Period of Division in South Korea]. In Han’guk ŭi yŏksaga wa yŏksahak, edited by Tonggŏl, Cho, Yŏngu, Han, and Ch’ansŭng., Pak Vol. 2. Seoul: Ch’angjak kwa Pip’yŏngsa.Google Scholar
T’Aegyun., Pak 1994. “Pukhan yŏksahak ŭi chŏn’gae wa yŏksa insik” [The Development and State of the Field of Historiography in North Korea]. In Han’guksa, edited by Man’gil, Kang et al. Vol. 23. Seoul: Han’gilsa.Google Scholar
Unsik., Pak 1975a. “Maengbae Kim Taejo” [Dreaming of Kim Taejo]. Pak Unsik chŏnsŏ. Vol. 2. Seoul: Tan’guk taehakkyo ch’ulp’ansa.Google Scholar
Unsik., Pak 1975b. “Chŏn’gaesomun chŏn” [A Biography of Chŏn’gaesomun]. Pak ŭnsik chŏnso. Vol. 2. Seoul: Tan’guk taehakkyo ch’ulp’ansa.Google Scholar
Yŏngsŏk., Pak 1982. “Tanjae Sin Ch’aeho ŭi Manjugwan” [Sin Ch’aeho’s Perspective on Manchuria]. In Hanminjok tongnip undongsa yŏn’gu. Seoul: Ilchogak.Google Scholar
Yingming., Peng 1985. “Guanyu woguo minzu gainian lishi de chubu kaocha” [A Preliminary Investigation on the History of Our Country’s Concept of Minzu]. Minzu Yanjiu 2: 5–11.Google Scholar
Pusey, James. 1983. China and Charles Darwin. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, Michael. 1984. “National Identity in the Thought of Sin Ch’aeho.” Journal of Korean Studies 5: 121–42.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John G. 1993. “Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations.” International Organization 47.1 (Winter): 139–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryang, Key S. 1987 and 1990. “Sin Ch’ae-ho (1880–1936) and Modern Korean Historiography.” Journal of Modern Korean Studies, Part I, 3 (Dec): 1–10, and Part II, 4 (May): 13–53.Google Scholar
Sahlins, Peter. 1989. Beyond Boundaries: The Making of France and Spain in the Pyrenees. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ch’aeho., Sin 1908a. “Toksa Sillon” [A New Reading of History]. TSCC 1: 467–513.Google Scholar
Ch’aeho., Sin 1908b. “Han’guk kwa Manju” [Korea and Manchuria]. TSCC 4: 232–34.Google Scholar
Ch’aeho., Sin 1908c. “ŭlchi Mundŏk.” TSCC 2: 127–64.Google Scholar
Ch’aeho., Sin 1908d. “Yŏksa wa aeguksim ŭi kwan’gae” [The Relation Between History and Patriotism]. TSCC 2:343–59.Google Scholar
Ch’aeho., Sin 1910a. “Manju munje-e ch’wihayŏ chaeronham” [More Thoughts on the Manchurian Problem]. TSCC 4: 238–43.Google Scholar
Ch’aeho., Sin 1910b. “Han’guk minjok chirisang palchŏn” [The Geographical Development of the Korean minjok]. TSCC 4: 198–99.Google Scholar
Sin, Ilch’ ŏl. 1981. “Sin Ch’aeho ŭi chagangnonjŏk sŏgu suyong.” In his Sin Ch’aeho ŭi yŏksa sasang yŏn’gu. Seoul: Koryŏ University Press.Google Scholar
Yongha., Sin 1987. “Sin Ch’aeho ŭi ch’ogi minjokchuŭi sagwan kwa hugi minjokchŭi sagwan” [Sin Ch’aeho’s Early and Late Nationalist History]. In his Han’guk kŭndae sahoe sasangsa Yŏn’gu. Seoul: Ilchisa.Google Scholar
TaeHan Hyŏphoe Hoebo [Korean Cooperative Society Monthly]. 1976. Reprint of July 1906–July 1907 issues. Seoul: Asea Munhwasa.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Stefan. 1993. Japan’s Orient: Rendering Pasts into History. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Thongchai, Winichakul. 1994. Siam Mapped: A History of the Geo-body of a Nation. Honolulu: Universty of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Chinsun, To. 1994. “Pukhan yŏksa hakkye ŭi tonghyang kwa insik ŭi tŭksŏng” [Trends and Special Characteristics of the North Korean Historical Community]. In Han’guk ŭii yŏksaga wa yŏksahak, edited by Tonggŏl, Cho, Yŏngu, Han, and Ch’ansung., Pak Vol. 2. Seoul: Ch’angjak kwa Pip’yŏngsa.Google Scholar
Tongwen huikao. 1977. Taipei: Kueiting chupanshe.Google Scholar
TSCC, Tanjae Sin Ch’aeho chŏnjip [Complete Works of Tanjae, Sin Ch’aeho]. 1987. Rev. ed. Edited by Tanjae Sin Ch’aeho chŏnjip p’yŏnch’an wiwŏnhoe. 4 vols. Seoul: ŭlyu munhwasa.Google Scholar
Chunghwan, Yi. 1971. Reprint. T’aengni chi [A Guide to Selecting a Village]. Seoul: ŭlyu Munhwasa.Google Scholar
Kibaek, Yi. 1978a. “Singminjuŭijŏk Han’guk sagwan pip’an” [A Critique of Colonial Perspectives on Korean History]. In his Minjok kwa yŏksa. Seoul: Ilchogak.Google Scholar
Kibaek, Yi. 1978b. “Minjokchuŭi sahak ŭi munje” [Problems in Nationalist Historiography]. In his Miniok kwa yŏksa. Seoul: Ilchogak.Google Scholar
Kwangnin, Yi. 1978. “Korea’s Responses to Social Darwinism.” Korea Journal, Part 1:18.4 (April):36–47, and Part 11:18.5 (May):42–49.Google Scholar
Kwangnin, Yi. 1979. Han’guk kaebwa sasang yŏn’gu [Studies on Korean Enlightenment Thought]. Seoul: Ilchogak.Google Scholar
Manyŏl, Yi. 1990. Tanjae Sin Ch’aeho ŭi yŏksahak yŏn’gu [Studies on the Historiography of Tanjae Sin Ch’aeho]. Seoul: Munhak kwa Pip'yŏngsa.Google Scholar
Yusong, Yi. 1976. “Yijo hugi kŭn’gi hakpa-e issŏsŏ ŭi chŏngt’ongnon ŭi chŏn’gae.” In Han’guk ŭi yŏksa insik, edited by Yusŏng, Yi and Man’gil, Kang. Seoul: Changch’ak kwa pip’yŏngsa.Google Scholar
Chonggap, Yu. 1991. Pukpang yŏngt’oron [On the Northern Territories]. Seoul: Pŏpkyŏng ch’ulp’ansa.Google Scholar
Tŭkkong, Yŭ. 1976. Reprint. Parhae ko. [An Investigation on Parhae]. Seoul: Kyŏngmunsa.Google Scholar