Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:24:51.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Presidential Address: State Formation in Asia—Prolegomenon to a Comparative Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

Susanne Hoeber Rudolph
Get access

Extract

The dictionary says that a prolegomenon is “a learned preface or preamble, … introductory or preliminary observations on the subject of a book.” And indeed, the remarks I am about to make are preliminary to a volume on state formation that Lloyd Rudolph and I hope to produce one of these years. Such a prolegomenon is also a commitment to a path of action, a justification, a polemic in favor of what one proposes to do. Today, I want to speak for the domain of comparison.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 46 , Issue 4 , November 1987 , pp. 731 - 746
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Anderson, Perry. 1974. Lineages of the Absolutist State. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Bailey, Anne M., and Llobera, Joseph R.. 1981. The Asiatic Mode of Production. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Balázs, Étienne. 1964. Chinese Civilization and Bureaucracy. Ed. Wright, Arthur. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Barker, Ernest. 1966. The Development of Public Services in Western Europe, 1630–1930. Hamden, Conn.: Archon Books.Google Scholar
Basham, A. L. 1969. The Wonder That Was India. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
Bellah, Robert, et al. 1985. Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bendix, Reinhard. 1978. Kings or People: Power and the Mandate to Rule. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bodde, Derk. 1981. Essays on Chinese Civilization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brass, Paul. 1974. Language, Religion, and Politics in North India. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Braun, Rudolph. 1975. “Taxation, Sociopolitical Structure, and State-Building: Great Britain and Brandenburg Prussia.” In The Formation of National States in Western Europe, ed. Tilly, Charles, 243–327. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Buhler, Georg. 1975. The Laws of Manu. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Butterfield, H. 1940. The Statecraft of Machiavelli. London: G. Bell and Sons.Google Scholar
Carnoy, Martin. 1984. The State and Political Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Bernard S. 1977. “African Models and Indian Histories.” In Realm and Region in Traditional India, ed. Fox, Richard G., 90–113. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Monograph.Google Scholar
Cohen, Ronald, and Service, Elman R.. 1978. Origins of the State: The Anthropology of Political Evolution. Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.Google Scholar
Coulborn, Rushton, ed. 1956. Feudalism in History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Creel, Herrlee G. 1970. The Origins of Statecraft in China: The Western Chou Empire. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dower, John, ed. 1975. Origins of the Modern Japanese State: Selected Writings of E. H. Norman. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Downing, Brian, 1986. “The International Order and Political Institutionalization in Early Modern Europe.” Unpublished paper for the Department of Political Science, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Dyson, Kenneth. 1980. The State Tradition in Europe: A Study of an Idea and Institution. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ehnbom, Daniel J. 1985. Indian Miniatures: The Ehrenfeld Collection. New York: Hudson Hills Press.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, S. N. 1969. The Political Systems of Empires: The Rise and Fall of the Historical Bureaucratic Societies. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Fairbank, John K. 1983. The United States and China. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Farmer, Edward L., et al. 1977. Comparative History of Civilizations in Asia. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Finer, Samuel E. 1975. “State and Nation-Building in Europe: The Role of the Military.” In The Formation of National States in Western Europe, ed. Tilly, Charles, 84–163. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fox, Richard G. 1970. “Avatars of Indian Research.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 12:59–72.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1980. Negara: The Theatre State in Nineteenth-Century Bali. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Habib, Irfan. 1961. “An Examination of Wittfogel's Theory of Oriental Despotism.” Enquiry 6:54–73.Google Scholar
Habib, Irfan. 1963. The Agrarian System of Mughal India, 1556–1707. New York: Asia Publishing House.Google Scholar
Halbfass, Wilhelm. 1985. “India and the Comparative Method.” Philosophy East and West 35:3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, John Whitney. 1968. Japan: From Prehistory to Modern Times. New York: Dell Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Hanson, Paul. 1984. “Sovereignty and Service Relationships in the Timurid Corporate Dynasty Under Babur: The Continuing Legacy of the Chinghis Khanid Political System.” Ph.D. diss., University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Heitzman, James. 1984. “Segments, Centralization, and Modes of Production in the Cola State.”Paper presented to the South Asia Conference,Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Ho, Ping-Ti. 1971. “The Significance of the Ch'ing Period in Chinese History.” In Modern China, ed. Levenson, Joseph R., 17–25. London: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
Ho, Ping-Ti. 1984. “The Paleoenvironment of North China—A Review Article.” Journal of Asian Studies 44:723–733.Google Scholar
Inalcik, Halil. 1954. “Ottoman Methods of Conquest.” Studia Islamica 2:103–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inalcik, Halil. 1955. “Land Problems in Turkish History.” The Muslim World 45:221–229.Google Scholar
Inalcik, Halil. 1969. “Suleiman the Lawgiver and Ottoman Law.” Archivum Ottomanicum 1:105–137.Google Scholar
Inalcik, Halil. 1973. The Ottoman Empire: The Classical Age, 1300–1600. Trans. Itzkowitz, N. and Imber, C.. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Inalcik, Halil. 1977. “Centralization and Decentralization in Ottoman Administration.” In Studies in Eighteenth-Century Islamic History, ed. Naff, Thomas and Owen, Roger, 28–51. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Inden, Ronald. 1986. “Orientalist Constructions of India.” Modern Asian Studies 20:401–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itzkowitz, Norman. 1972. Ottoman Empire and Islamic Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kangle, R. P. 1960–65. The Kautiliya Arthasastra. 3 vols. Bombay: T. V. Chidambaram for the University of Bombay Studies.Google Scholar
Keightley, David N., ed. 1983. The Origins of Chinese Civilization. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Philip A. 1980. Rebellion and Its Enemies in Late Imperial China: Militarization and Social Structure, 1796–1864. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, Arthur O. 1976. The Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an Idea. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Luttwak, Edward N. 1976. The Grand Strategy of the Roman Empire: From the First Century A.D. to the Third. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, William. 1963. The Rise of the West. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, T. H. 1977. Class, Citizenship, and Social Development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Min, Byung-Il. 1986. “Formation of the First Empire in China.” M.A. paper, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Mirza, Nathan. 1936. Buharistan-I-Ghaybi. Trans. Borah, M. I.. Gauhati: Assam Department of Historical and Antiquarian Studies.Google Scholar
Moore, Barrington Jr. 1967. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Nettl, J. P. 1968. “The State as a Conceptual Variable.” World Politics 20:559–592.Google Scholar
Palat, Ravi Arvind. 1987. “Structures of Class Control in Late Medieval South Asia: Construction of an Interstate System (Circa 1300–1600).”Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Asian Studies,Boston,April 10–12, 1987.Google Scholar
Poggi, Gianfranco. 1978. The Development of the Modern State: A Sociological Introduction. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Rice, Eugene F. 1970. The Foundations of Early Modern Europe, 1460–1559. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Richards, John F. 1978. “The Formulation of Imperial Authority Under Akbar and Jahangir.” In Kingship and Authority in South Asia, ed. Richards, John F., 252–285. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Rudolph, Lloyd, and Rudolph, Susanne Hoeber. 1985. “The Subcontinental Empire and the Regional Kingdom in Indian State Formation.” In Region and Nation in India, ed. Wallace, Paul, 40–59. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH.Google Scholar
Schram, Stuart R., ed. 1985. The Scope of State Power in China. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Shamasastry, R., trans. 1960. Kautilya's Arthasastra. 6th ed.Mysore: Mysore Printing and Publishing House.Google Scholar
Shastri, K. A. Nilakanta. 1955. The Colas. Rev. ed.Madras: University of Madras.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1979. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Somers, Robert. 1986. “Time, Space, and Structure in the Consolidation of the T'ang Dynasty (A.D. 617–700).” Journal of Asian Studies 45:971–994.Google Scholar
Southall, Aidan W. 1956. Alur Society: A Study in Processes and Types of Domination. Cambridge: W. Heffer.Google Scholar
Srinivas, M. N. 1962. Caste in Modern India and Other Essays. Bombay: Asia Publishing House.Google Scholar
Stein, Burton. 1968. “Review of Sangam Polity.” Indian Economic and Social History Review 5:109–115.Google Scholar
Stein, Burton. 1975. “The State and the Agrarian Order in Medieval South India: A Historiographical Critique.” In Essays on South India, ed. Stein, Burton, 64–91. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Stein, Burton. 1977. “The Segmentary State in South Indian History.” In Realm and Region in Traditional India, ed. Fox, Richard G., 3–51. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Monograph.Google Scholar
Stein, Burton. 1978. “All the King's Mana: Perspectives on Kingship in Medieval South India.” In Kingship and Authority in South Asia, ed. Richards, John F., 115–167. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Stein, Burton. 1980. Peasant State and Society in Medieval South India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Streusand, Douglas. 1982. “Military Organization, Provincial Government, and Political Violence in the Ottoman and Mughal Empires.” Unpublished paper, Department of History, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Tambiah, S. J. 1976. World Conqueror and World Renouncer: A Study of Buddhism and Polity in Thailand Against a Historical Background. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thapar, Romila. 1978. Ancient Indian Social History: Some Interpretations. New Delhi: Orient Longman.Google Scholar
Thapar, Romila. 1984. From Lineage to State. Bombay: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1975. The Formation of National States in Western Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1984. Big Structures, Large Processes, and Huge Comparisons. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Twitchett, Denis C. 1965. “Provincial Autonomy and Central Finance in Late T'ang.” Asia Major, n.s. 11:211–232.Google Scholar
Twitchett, Denis C., and Loewe, Michael, eds. 1986. The Cambridge History of China. Vol. 1, The Ch'in and Han Empires, 221 B.C.–A.D. 220. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Varma, Shail. 1981. “The Absolutist State: An Inquiry into the Power Structure of England and France in the Context of a Critique of Perry Anderson's Lineages of the Absolutist State.” M.A. paper, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Wakeman, Frederic Jr. 1975. The Fall of Imperial China. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1974–80. The Modern World System. 2 vols. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wan, Gungwu. 1963. The Structure of Power in North China During the Five Dynasties. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: University of Malaysia Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Yu-Ch'uan. 1949. “An Outline of the Central Government of the Former Han Dynasty.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 12:134–187.Google Scholar
Wittfogel, Karl A. 1981. Oriental Despotism: A Comparative Study of Total Power. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Ziegler, Norman P. 1978. “Some Notes on Rajput Loyalties During the Mughal Period.” In Kingship and Authority in South Asia, ed. Richards, J. F., 215–251. Wisconsin: South Asian Studies, University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Zolberg, Aristide R. 1981. “Origins of the Modern World System: A Missing Link.” World Politics 33:253–281.Google Scholar