Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:04:10.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Preparation for the Occupation of Japan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

Get access

Extract

In the twenty years since Japan's surrender, new materials and greater perspective allow for more effective probing than heretofore of American policies on the occupation of Japan. This study aims to further this task by posing and answering—at least in part—several questions which underlay these policies.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Department of State, Postwar Foreign Policy Preparation 1935–1945, Washington, 1949, Publication 3580, 348Google Scholar.

2 This statement, which was originated in SWNCC, was approved by President Truman on September 6, 1945. See Jones, F. C., Borton, Hugh and Pearn, B. R., The Far East 1942–46, Oxford University Press, 1955. P. 502Google Scholar.

3 Ibid, p. 506.

4 Ibid, p. 512.

5 See McNelly, Theodore, “The Japanese Constitution,” Political Science Quarterly, LXXIV, (June, 1959) 179Google Scholar, and The Renunciation of War in the Japanese Constitution,” Political Science Quarterly, LXXVII (September, 1962), 357 ffGoogle Scholar.

6 Notes of the author, dated May 4, 1944.

7 Jones et al, op. cit., p. 493.

8 McNelly, op. cit., Political Science Quarterly, 1959, p. 183.

9 McNelly, op. cit., Political Science Quarterly, 1962, pp. 357–8.

10 Department of State, Activities of the Far Eastern Commission, Washington, 1947, pp. 6566Google Scholar.

11 Harry S. Truman, Memoirs, I, 264.

12 Borton, Hugh, Japan's Modern Century, New York, 1955, p. 392Google Scholar.

13 Blakeslee, George H., History of the Far Eastern Commission, Washington, Department of State Publication 5138, 1953, 44Google Scholar.

14 As the U.S.S.R. and India were new members of the FEC, they had not gone to Tokyo with the FEAC.

15 For a concise account of the drafting of the Constitution and the relationships of the SCAP with the Japanese government, see McNelly, Theodore, Contemporary Government of Japan, Boston, 1963, pp. 36 ffGoogle Scholar.

16 Jones et al, op. cit., p. 530.

17 Ibid, pp. 349 and 540.

18 Ibid, p. 543