Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T05:24:49.455Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Political Geography of Deities: Space and the Pantheon in Sinhalese Buddhism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

Deborah Winslow
Get access

Extract

The author of this article examines the role of Sinhalese Buddhist deities within the long Sinhalese tradition of using Buddhism to support political authority. Extensive contemporary information on deity territories suggests that because state political integration involves territorial integration localized deities have both reflected and been used to bring about an integration of local people into state administrative structures. However, this integration is not brought about by having the territories of the deities parallel administrative units (which they do not); it is brought about by having people think that they do, think that the territories of the gods correspond level by level to the administrative villages, districts, and provinces. As the relationship between these levels and the state has changed historically, that is, when center-hinterland integration has gone from strong to weak to strong again, people's understanding of the pantheon appears to have changed as well.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , February 1984 , pp. 273 - 291
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Abercrombie, Nicholas, Hill, Stephen, and Turner, Bryan S.. 1980. The Dominant Ideology Thesis. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Ahern, Emily Martin. 1981. Chinese Ritual and Politics. Cambridge Studies in Social Anthropology, 34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ames, Michael M. 1966. “Ritual Presentations and the Structure of the Sinhalese Pantheon.” In Nash, Manning, ed., Anthropological Studies in Theravada Buddhism, 27–50. Southeast Asia Studies Cultural Report Series, 13. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bottomore, Tom. 1980. “Foreward.” In Abercrombie, Nicholaset al., The Dominant Ideology Thesis, ix–x. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Carrithers, Michael. 1979. “The Modern Ascetics of Lanka and the Pattern of Change in Buddhism.” Man (n.s.) 14, 2:294–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceylon, , Government of. 1872. Report of the Service Tenures Commission. Colombo: Government Press.Google Scholar
Ceylon, , Government of. 1878. “The Report of the Commissioners Appointed to Inquiry into the Administration of the Buddhist Temporalities.” Ceylon Sessional Papers 17, 1876–1877. Colombo: H. A. Skeen.Google Scholar
Christian, William A. Jr., 1972. Person and God in a Spanish Valley. New York: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
de Silva, K. M. 1977. “Historical Survey.” In de Silva, K. M., ed., Sri Lanka: A Survey, 31–85. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Dewaraja, L. S. 1977. The Kandyan Kingdom of Ceylon, 1707–1760. Colombo: Lakehouse Investments, Ltd.Google Scholar
Eickelman, Dale F. 1976. Moroccan Islam: Tradition and Society in a Pilgrimage Center. Modern Middle East Series, 1. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1980. “The Confession of the Flesh.” In Gordon, C., ed., Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977, by Michel Foucault, 194–228. Gordon, C., Marshall, L., Mepham, J., and Soper, K., trans. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Gombrich, Richard F. 1971. Precept and Practice: Traditional Buddhism in the Rural Highlands of Ceylon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gunawardana, R. A. L. H. 1979. Robe and Plough: Monasticism and Economic Interest in Early Medieval Sri Lanka. Association for Asian Studies Monograph, 35. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Horsburgh, B. 1901. ‘Administrative Report for the Southern Province.” In Ceylon Government, Administration Reports for 1900. Section E. Colombo: Skeen.Google Scholar
Jiggins, Janice. 1978. Caste and Family in the Politics of the Sinhalese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jupp, James. 1978. Sri Lanka—Third World Democracy. Studies in Commonwealth Politics and History, 6. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Keyes, Charles F. 1975. “Buddhist Pilgrimage Centers and the Twelve-Year Cycle: Northern Thai Moral Orders in Space and Time.” History of Religion 15, 1:71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knox, Robert. 1681. An Historical Relation of Ceylon Together with Somewhat Concerning Several Remarkable Passages of My Life that Hath Happened since My Deliverance out of My Captivity. London: R. Chiswell. New edition (Glasgow: MacLehose, 1911); reprint (Dehiwala, Sri Lanka: Tisara, 1966).Google Scholar
Kottak, Conrad Phillip. 1978. Anthropology: The Exploration of Human Diversity. 2nd ed. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. P. 1908. ‘Administration Report-for the Central Province.” In Ceylon Government, Administration Reports for 1907. Section B. Colombo: Skeen.Google Scholar
Malalgoda, Kitsiri. 1976. Buddhism in Sinhalese Society, 1750–1900: A Study of Religious Revival and Change. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholas, C. W and S. Paranavitana. 1961. A Concise History of Ceylon: From the Earliest Times to the Arrival of the Portuguese in 1505. Colombo: Ceylon University Press.Google Scholar
Obeyesekere, Gananath. 1966. “The Buddhist Pantheon and Its Extensions.” In Nash, Manning, ed., Anthropological Studies in Theravada Buddhism, 1–26. Southeast Asia Studies Cultural Report Series, 13. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Obeyesekere, Gananath. 1977. “Social Change and the Deities: The Rise of the Kataragama Cult in Modern Sri Lanka.” Man (n.s.) 12, 3/4:377–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obeyesekere, Gananath. 1979. “Popular Religions.” In Fernando, Tissa and Kearney, Robert N., eds., Modern Sri Lanka: A Society in Transition, 201–26. Maxwell School Foreign and Comparative Studies South Asia Series, 4. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Phadnis, Urmilla. 1976. Religion and Politics in Sri Lanka. London: C. Hurst.Google Scholar
Pieris, Ralph. 1956. Sinhalese Social Organization: The Kandyan Period. Colombo: University of Ceylon Press.Google Scholar
Seligmann, C. G. 1909. “Note on the ‘Bandar’ Cult of the Kandyan Sinhalese.” Man 9:130–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seneviratne, H. L. 1978., Rituals of the Kandyan State. Cambridge Studies in Social Anthropology, 22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Bardwell L., ed. 1977. Religion and the Legitimization of Power in Sri Lanka. Chambersburg, Penn.: Anima.Google Scholar
Stirrat, R. L. 1979. “A Catholic Shrine in Its Social Context.” Sri Lanka Journal of Social Sciences 2, 1:77–108.Google Scholar
Stirrat, R. L. 1981. “The Shrine of St. Sebastian at Mirisgama: An Aspect of the Cult of the Saints in Catholic Sri Lanka.” Man (n.s.) 16, 2:183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tambiah, S. J. 1976. World Conqueror and World Renouncer: A Study of Buddhism and Polity in Thailand Against a Historical Background. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winslow, Deborah. 1977. “Polas in Central Sri Lanka: Some Preliminary Remarks on the Development,and Functioning of Periodic Markets.” In Samarasinghe, S. W. R. de A., ed., Agriculture in the Peasant Sector of Sri Lanka, 56–84. Peradeniya: University of Sri Lanka Press.Google Scholar
Winslow, Deborah. 1980. “Sri Lankan Rituals of First Menstruation.” Man (n.s.) 15:603–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winslow, Deborah. 1982. “Pantheon Politics: A Regional Analysis of Buddhism in Sri Lanka.” Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Wolf, Arthur R. 1974. “Gods, Ghosts, and Ancestors.” In Wolf, Arthur R., ed., Religion and Ritual in Chinese Society, 131–82. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar