Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T21:46:48.711Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ming Diplomacy and Patronage in Chinggisid Eurasia - In the Shadow of the Mongol Empire: Ming China and Eurasia. By David M. Robinson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020. xiii, 372 pp. ISBN: 9781108482448 (cloth). - Ming China and Its Allies: Imperial Rule in Eurasia. By David M. Robinson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020. 258 pp. ISBN: 9781108489225 (cloth).

Review products

In the Shadow of the Mongol Empire: Ming China and Eurasia. By David M. Robinson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020. xiii, 372 pp. ISBN: 9781108482448 (cloth).

Ming China and Its Allies: Imperial Rule in Eurasia. By David M. Robinson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020. 258 pp. ISBN: 9781108489225 (cloth).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2021

Ian M. Miller*
Affiliation:
St. John's University
Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews—Transnational and Comparative
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc., 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Robinson, David M., “Politics, Force and Ethnicity in Ming China: Mongols and the Abortive Coup of 1461,” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 59, no. 1 (1999): 79123CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Zhongguo as “Central State”: Shadow of the Mongol Empire, pp. 193–955 (citing Ming Taizu shilu [MTZSL] 25.7b–8a, pp. 374–75), pp. 241–42 (MTZSL 141.5a–b), pp. 245–46 (MTZSL 244.2b–4a); zhongguo as “China”: Shadow of the Mongol Empire, pp. 198–99 (MTZSL 46.10b–11a, pp. 926–27), pp. 204–5 (MTZSL 77.51-b, pp. 1417–18), pp. 232–33 (MTZSL 71.1b–2a, pp. 1314–15). These and the following are selected examples.

3 Hu as “northern horsemen”: Shadow of the Mongol Empire, pp. 232–33 (MTZSL 71.1b–2a, pp. 1314–15); hu as “barbarian”: Shadow of the Mongol Empire, pp. 198–99 (MTZSL 46.10b–11a, pp. 926–27).

4 Yi as “barbarian”: Shadow of the Mongol Empire, pp. 196–97 (MTZSL 41.3a, p. 819), pp. 198–99 (MTZSL 46.10b–11a, pp. 926–27), pp. 241–42 (MTZSL 141.5a–b); yi as “foreigner”: Shadow of the Mongol Empire, pp. 232–33 (MTZSL 71.1b–2a, pp. 1314–15), p. 236 (MTZSL 92.7a–8a); yi as “outlander”: Shadow of the Mongol Empire, pp. 193–95 (MTZSL 25.7b–8a, pp. 374–75); yi as “Yi” or “yi”: Shadow of the Mongol Empire, pp. 212, 232–33 (MTZSL 71.1b–2a, pp. 1314–15).

5 Robinson, David M., “Justifying Ming Rulership on a Eurasian Stage,” in Ming China: Courts and Contacts 1400–1450, ed. Clunas, Craig, Yu-Ping, Luk, and Harrison-Hall, Jessica (London: British Museum Press, 2016), 205Google Scholar.

6 On “Great States,” see Brook, Timothy, “Great States,” Journal of Asian Studies 75, no. 4 (2016): 957–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar.