Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:19:37.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lineage Organization in North China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

Myron L. Cohen
Get access

Extract

North china heretofore has been only minimally involved in the modern anthropological analysis of Chinese patrilineal kinship. In this region, lineage organization prior to the Communist era comprised a social structure, symbolism, and arrangement of ritual that call into question the line of anthropological inquiry that has focused almost exclusively on the linkages between a lineage's corporate resources and its social cohesion. The characteristics of lineages in Yangmansa, a village approximately seventy-five kilometers south of Beijing, appear to have been typical of this broader north China pattern considerably different from those associated with the southeastern Chinese model that has dominated the anthropological literature. Although many elements of northern lineage organization are found also in the southeast and elsewhere in China, they are combined in the north into a distinctive arrangement of cemeteries, graves, ancestral scrolls, ancestral tablets, and corporate groups linked to a characteristic annual ritual cycle. I deal first with the expression in Yangmansa of key features of the north China pattern, but also draw on other sources to fill out the picture and establish its broader regional relevance.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 49 , Issue 3 , August 1990 , pp. 509 - 534
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Baker, Hugh D. R. 1968. A Chinese Lineage Village: Sheung Shui. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Chi-Nan. 1984. Fang and Chia-tsu: The Chinese Kinship System in Rural Taiwan. Ph.D. diss., Yale University.Google Scholar
Cohen, Myron L. 1969a. “Agnatic Kinship in South Taiwan.” Ethnology 15:237–92.Google Scholar
Cohen, Myron L. 1969b. “The Role of Contract in Traditional Chinese Social Organization.” In Proceedings VIIth International Congress of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences, Tokyo and Kyoto, 1968. Vol. II, Ethnology: 130–32. Tokyo: Science Council of Japan.Google Scholar
Cohen, Myron L. 1970. “Introduction.” In Village Life in China. Arthur H. Smith. Boston: Little, Brown, and Co.Google Scholar
Cohen, Myron L. 1976. House United, House Divided: The Chinese Family in Taiwan. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Myron L. 1985. “Lineage Development and the Family in China.” In The Chinese Family and Its Ritual Behavior, ed. Jih-chang, Hsieh and Chuang, Ying-chang, pp. 210–220. Taipei: Academia Sinica, Institute of Ethnology.Google Scholar
Prasenjit, Duara. 1988. Culture, Power, and the State: Rural North China, 1900-1942. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Eberhard. 1952. Chinese Festivals. New York: Henry Schuman.Google Scholar
Ebrey, Patricia B. and Watson, James L., eds. 1986. Kinship Organization in Late Imperial China, 1000-1940. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ebrey, Patricia B. 1986. “The Early Stages in the Development of Descent Group Organization.” In Kinship Organization in Late Imperial China, 1000-1940, ed. Ebrey, Patricia B. and Watson, James L., pp. 16–61. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
David, Faure. 1986. The Structure of Chinese Rural Society: Lineage and Village in the Eastern New Territories, Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
David, Faure. 1989. “The Lineage as Cultural Invention: The Case of the Pearl River Delta.” Modern China 15:4–37.Google Scholar
Maurice, Freedman. 1958. Lineage Organization in Southeastern China. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Maurice, Freedman. 1966. Chinese Lineage and Society: Fukien and Kwangtung. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Gamble, Sidney D. 1954. Ting Hsien: A North China Rural Community. New York: Institute of Pacific Relations.Google Scholar
Gamble, Sidney D. 1963. North China Villages: Social, Political, and Economic Activities Before 1933. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Huang, Philip C. 1985. The Peasant Economy and Social Change in North China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, R. F. 1910. Lion and Dragon in Northern China. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Judd, Ellen R. 1989. “Niangjia: Chinese Women and Their Natal Families.” Journal of Asian Studies 48:525–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Susan, Naquin and Rawski, Evelyn S.. 1987. Chinese Society in the Eighteenth Century. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Burton, Pasternak. 1969. “The Role of the Frontier in Chinese Lineage Development.” Journal of Asian Studies 28:551–61.Google Scholar
Burton, Pasternak. 1972. Kinship and Community in Two Chinese Villages. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Potter, Jack M. 1968. Capitalism and the Chinese Peasant: Social and Economic Change in a Hong Kong Village. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Potter, Jack M. 1970. “Land and Lineage in Traditional China.” In Family and Kinship in Chinese Society, ed. Freedman, Maurice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Potter, Sulamith H. and Potter, Jack M.. 1990. China's Peasants: The Anthropology of a Revolution. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawski, Evelyn S. 1985. “Economic and Social Foundations of Late Imperial Culture.” In Popular Culture in Late Imperial China, ed. Johnson, David, Nathan, Andrew J. and Rawski, Evelyn S., pp. 3–33. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawski, Evelyn S. 1986. “The Ma Landlords of Yang-chia-kou in Late Ch'ing and Republican China.” In Kinship Organization in Late Imperial China, 1000-1940, ed. Ebrey, Patricia B. and Watson, James L., pp. 245–73. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sangren, , Steven, P.. 1984. “Traditional Chinese Corporations: Beyond Kinship.” Journal of Asian Studies 43:391–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siu, Helen F. 1989. Agents and Victims in South China: Accomplices in Rural Revolution. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Arthur H. 1970. Village Life in China. Boston: Little, Brown. Originally published in 1899.Google Scholar
Strauch, Judith. 1983. “Community and Kinship in Southeastern China: The View from the Multilineage Villages in Hong Kong.” Journal of Asian Studies 43:21–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, James L. 1976. Emigration and the Chinese Lineage: The Mans in Hong Kong and London. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Watson, James L. 1982. “Chinese Kinship Reconsidered: Anthropological Perspectives on Historical Research.” China Quarterly 92:589–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, James L. 1986. “Anthropological Overview: The Development of Chinese Descent Groups.” In Kinship Organization in Late Imperial China, 1000-1940, ed. Ebrey, Patricia B. and Watson, James L., pp. 274–89. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Watson, Rubie S. 1985. Inequality Among Brothers: Class and Kinship in South China. New York, Cambridge and London: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Rubie S. 1986. “The Named and the Nameless: Gender and Person in Chinese Society.” American Ethnologist 13:619–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Martin C. 1945. A Chinese Village: Taitou, Shantung Province. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar