Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T22:50:12.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Justices and Paṇḍitas: Some Ironies in Contemporary Readings of the Hindu Legal Past

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

Richard W. Lariviere
Get access

Extract

India's history provides one of the best documented examples of colonialism. The British kept meticulous records of their attempts to improve, govern, and even exploit the people and institutions of the subcontinent. Improvement and government often occurred at the expense of traditional institutions, especially in the area of the legal tradition. The British are responsible for the decline and eventual demise of the living dharmaśāstra (science of orthodox behavior) tradition. The tradition has not been resuscitated in independent India. Nevertheless, even though the office of Paṇḍita (traditional expert) has long been abolished from the courts and the very training of modern Paṇḍitas has become rare, the texts of the dharmaśāstra tradition continue to be used in a very “paṇḍitic” fashion by the courts of modern India. The justices function as Paṇḍitas, and the texts they cite are mere window dressing for the interpretations of Hindu law they seek to promulgate.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 48 , Issue 4 , November 1989 , pp. 757 - 769
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Anon. N.d. Why Hindu Code Is Detestable. Calcutta and Allahabad: Shastra Dharma Prachar Sabha.Google Scholar
Bagal, Jogesh Chandra, ed. 1969. Bankim Rachanāvalī. Calcutta: Calcutta Sāhityā Samsad.Google Scholar
Cohn, Bernard S. 1959. “Some Notes on Law and Social Change in North India.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 8:79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohn, Bernard S. 1965. “Anthropological Notes on Disputes and Law in India.” American Anthropologist 67, pt. 2:82–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colebrooke, Thomas E. 1884. Life of the Honourable Mountstuart Elphinstone. 2 vols. London: J. Murray.Google Scholar
Derrett, John Duncan Martin. 1961. “J. H. Nelson: A Forgotten Administrator-Historian of India.” In Historians of India, Pakistan, and Ceylon, ed. Philips, C. H., 354–372. London: Oxford University Press. Reprinted in 1977 in Derrett's Essays in Classical and Modern Hindu Law 2:404–23. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Derrett, John Duncan Martin. 1968. Religion, Law, and the State in India. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Derrett, John Duncan Martin. 1969. The Indian Subcontinent Under European Influence. E/8 in Bibliographical Introduction to Legal History and Ethnology, ed. Gilissen, John. Brussels: Free University.Google Scholar
Derrett, John Duncan Martin. 1971. “A Want of Legal History in the Supreme Court.” Madras Law Journal, January–June, p. 39.Google Scholar
Derrett, John Duncan Martin. 1978. The Death of a Marriage Law: Epitaph for the Rishis. New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House.Google Scholar
Diwan, Paras. 1979. Modern Hindu Law. Allahabad: Allahabad Law Agency.Google Scholar
Dvivedi, Manilal Nabhubhai, ed. 1901. Vivādatāṇḍava. Baroda: Lakṣmīvilāsa Press.Google Scholar
Engineer, Ali Asghar. 1987. The Shah Bano Controversy. Hyderabad: Orient Longman.Google Scholar
Forrest, G.W. 1910. Selections from the State Papers of the Governor-Generals of India: Warren Hastings. 4 vols. Oxford: B. H. Blackwell; London: Constable & Co.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1968. “The Displacement of Traditional Law in Modern India.” Journal of Social Issues 24:65–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1972. “The Aborted Restoration of ‘Indigenous’ Law in India.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 14, no. 1:53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleig, G. R. 1841. Memoirs of Warren Hastings. 3 vols. London: Bentley.Google Scholar
Goldstücker, Theodor. 1871. On the Deficiencies in the Present Administration of Hindu Law. London: Trübner.Google Scholar
Halbfass, Wilhelm. 1988. India and Europe: An Essay in Understanding. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Hayden, Robert M. 1983. “Excommunication as Everyday Event and Ultimate Sanction: The Nature of Suspension from an Indian Caste.” Journal of Asian Studies 42, no. 2:291–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jai, Janak Raj. 1986. Shah Bano. New Delhi: Rajiv Publications.Google Scholar
Jain, M. P.2d ed., 1966; 3d ed., 1972. Outlines of Indian Legal History. Bombay: Tripathi.Google Scholar
Khodie, N., ed. 1975. Readings in Uniform Civil Code. Bombay: Tripathi.Google Scholar
Macnaghten, Francis. 1824. Considerations on the Hindoo Law as It Is Current in Bengal. Serampore: Mission Press.Google Scholar
Mahmood, Tahir, ed. 1975. Family Law and Social Change. Bombay: Tripathi.Google Scholar
Mahmood, Tahir, ed. 1978. Civil Marriage Law: Perspectives and Prospects. Bombay: Tripathi.Google Scholar
Mandlik, Vishvanath Narayan. 1880. The Vyavahāra Mayükha. Bombay: Education Society's Press.Google Scholar
Mayer, Adrian C. 1960. Caste and Kinship in Central India: A Village and Its Region. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalf, Thomas R. 1979. Land, Landlords, and the British Raj. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Minault, Gail. 1988. “Legal and Scholarly Activism: Recent Women's Studies on India—A Review Article.” Journal of Asian Studies 47:814–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pandey, Bishwa Nath. 1967. The Introduction of English Law into India. Bombay: Asia Publishing House.Google Scholar
Pollock, Frederick, and Maitland, Frederic William. 1968. The History of English Law. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rankin, G. C. 1946. Background to Hindu Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rocher, Ludo. 1976. “In Defense of Jīmūtavāhana.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 96:107–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rocher, Rosane. 1983. Orientalism, Poetry, and the Millennium: The Checkered Life of Nathaniel Brassey Halhed, 1751–1830. New Delhi: Motilal.Google Scholar
Sarkar [Śāstrī[, Golap Chandra. 1910. 4th ed.A Treatise on Hindu Law. Calcutta: Banerjee.Google Scholar
Shyam Sunder v. State of Bihar A.I.R. 1981 S.C. 178.Google Scholar
Strange, Thomas. 1830. Hindu Law, Principally with Reference to … the Administration of Justice in the King's Courts in India. 2 vols. London: Parbury, Allen.Google Scholar
Trevelyan, Hannah (Lady). 1880. Miscellaneous Works of Lord Macaulay. 5 vols. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Venkata Subbarao, G. C. 1969. “Authoritative Translations of Legal Enactments.” Supreme Court Journal 1:50.Google Scholar
Washbrook, D. A. 1981. “Law, State and Agrarian Society in Colonial India.” Modern Asian Studies 15:649–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar