Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T09:21:18.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Power to Value: Ranked Titles in an Egalitarian Society, Laos

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2010

Guido Sprenger
Get access

Abstract

In the Southeast Asian highlands, different types of hierarchy appear as forms of social organization as well as devices for intersocietal communication. In the present case, ranked titles from centralized Tai Meuang hierarchies such as the Lao or the Lue in southern China have been adopted by Rmeet (Lamet) uplanders in northern Laos, where the main type of hierarchy is the decentralized superiority of wife-givers over wife-takers. In the process of adoption, title-giving was subordinated to wife-giving, and today the wife-givers are the ritual source of ranks. In the course of history, title-giving has thus been integrated into Rmeet forms of sociocosmic reproduction while, at the same time, titles have lost their initial function of communication between upland societies and lowland state formations.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 69 , Issue 2 , May 2010 , pp. 403 - 425
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Aymé, G. 1930. Monographie du Ve territoire militaire. Hanoi: Imprimerie d'extreme-orient.Google Scholar
Barraud, Cécile, de Coppet, Daniel, Iteanu, André, and Jamous, Raymond. 1994. Of Relations and the Dead: Four Societies Viewed from the Angle of Their Exchanges. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Bounthavy, Sisouphanthong, and Taillard, Christian. 2000. Atlas of Laos: spatial structures of the economic and social development on the Lao People's Democratic Republic. Chiang Mai: Silkworm.Google Scholar
Bouté, Vanina. 2007. “Political Hierarchical Processes among Some Highlanders of Laos.” In Social Dynamics in the Highlands of Southeast Asia: Reconsidering Political Systems of Highland Burma by E. R. Leach, ed. Robinne, François and Sadan, Mandy, 187–208. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowie, Katherine. 1996. “Slavery in Nineteenth Century Northern Thailand: Archival Anecdotes and Village Voices.” In State Power and Culture in Thailand, ed. Durrenberger, E. Paul, 330–48. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Southeast Asia Studies.Google Scholar
Han-seng, Chen. 1949. Frontier Land Systems in Southernmost China: A Comparative Study of Agrarian Problems and Social Organization among the Pai Yi People of Yunnan and the Kamba People of Kamba. New York: Institute of Pacific Relations.Google Scholar
Davis, Sara. 2006. “Premodern Flows in Postmodern China: Globalization and the Sipsòng Panna Tais.” In Centering the Margin: Agency and Narrative in Southeast Asian Borderlands, ed. Horstmann, Alexander and Wadley, Reed, 87–110. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Dumont, Louis. 1966. “Marriage in India: The Present State of the Question III: North India in Relation to South India.” Contributions to Indian Sociology 9:90–114.Google Scholar
Dumont, Louis. 1980. Homo Hierarchicus: The Caste System and Its Implications. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Grant. 2000. “Tai-ization: Ethnic Change in Northern Indochina.” In Civility and Savagery: Identity in Tai States, ed. Turton, Andrew, 263–89. Richmond: Curzon.Google Scholar
Evrard, Olivier. 2007. “Interethnic Systems and Localized Identities: The Khmu Subgroups (tmoy) in North-West Laos.” In Social Dynamics in the Highlands of Southeast Asia: Reconsidering Political Systems of Highland Burma by E. R. Leach, ed. Robinne, François and Sadan, Mandy, 127–59. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, Lishi. 1990. “The Nomenclature of the Dais in Xishuangbanna and Its Social Meaning.” In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Thai Studies, vol. 2, 273–87. Kunming: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Grabowsky, Volker. 2006. “Das Gemeinwesen der Tai (Dai) in Yunnan: Historische Perspektiven.” In Han-Zeit: Festschrift für Hans Stumpfeldt aus Anlaß seines 65. Geburtstages, ed. Friedrich, Michael, 573–96. Wiesbaden: Harassowitz.Google Scholar
Grabowsky, Volker, and Wichasin, Renoo. 2008. Chronicles of Chiang Khaeng: A Tai Lue Principality of the Upper Mekong. Honolulu: Center of Southeast Asian Studies, University of Hawai‘i.Google Scholar
Grabowsky, Volker, and Turton, Andrew. 2003. The Gold and Silver Road to Trade and Friendship: The McLeod and Richardson Diplomatic Missions to Tai States in 1837. Chiang Mai: Silkworm.Google Scholar
Graeber, David. 2001. Toward an Anthropological Theory of Value: The False Coin of Our Own Dreams. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, Shi-chung. 1989. “Ethno-Political Adaptation and Ethnic Change of the Sipsòng Panna Dai: An Ethnohistorical Analysis.” PhD diss., University of Washington.Google Scholar
Hsieh, Shi-chung. 1995. “On the Dynamics of Tai/Dai-Lue Ethnicity: An Ethnohistorical Analysis.” In Cultural Encounters on China's Ethnic Frontiers, ed. Harell, Stevan. 301–28. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Izikowitz, Karl Gustav. [1951] 1979. Lamet: Hill Peasants in French Indochina. New York: AMS Press.Google Scholar
Izikowitz, Karl Gustav. 1985. Compass for Fields Afar: Essays in Social Anthropology. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
Izikowitz, Karl Gustav. [1944] 2004. Over the Misty Mountain: A Journey from Tonkin to the Lamet in Laos. Trans. Berngrim, Helena. Bangkok: White Lotus.Google Scholar
Jonsson, Hjorleifur. 2005. Mien Relations: Mountain People and State Control in Thailand. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kammerer, Cornelia Ann. 1998. “Descent, Alliance, and Political Order among Akha.” American Ethnologist 25 (4): 659–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kandre, Peter. 1967. “Autonomy and Integration of Social Systems: The Iu Mien (‘Yao’ or ‘Man’) Mountain Population and Their Neighbors.” In Southeast Asian Tribes, Minorities, and Nations, vol. 2, ed. Kunstadter, Peter, 583–628. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kato, Kumiko. 1990. “Power Division Model of Muang Polity of Tai-Lue.” In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Thai Studies, vol. 3, 364–71. Kunming: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Kirsch, A. Thomas. 1973. Feasting and Social Oscillation: A Working Paper on Religion and Society in Upland Southeast Asia. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University, Southeast Asia Program.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, Edmund. 1961. “The Structural Implications of Matrilateral Cross-Cousin Marriage.” In Rethinking Anthropology, by Edmund Leach, 54–104. London: University of London/Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Leach, Edmund. 1969. “‘Kachin’ and ‘Haka Chin’: A Rejoinder to Levi-Strauss.” Man 4 (2): 277–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, Edmund. [1954] 2001. Political Systems of Highland Burma: A Study of Kachin Social Structure. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Lebar, Frank M., Hickey, Gerald C., and Musgrave, John K.. 1964. Ethnic Groups of Mainland Southeast Asia. New Haven, Conn.: Human Relations Area Files Press.Google Scholar
Lefèvre-Pontalis, Pierre. [1902] 2000. Travels in Upper Laos and on the Borders of Yunnan and Burma. Vol. 5 of The Pavie Mission Indochina Papers. Bangkok: White Lotus. [Originally published as Voyages dans le Haut Laos et sur les frontières de Chine et de Birmanie. Paris: Leroux]Google Scholar
Lehman, F. K. 1967. “Burma: Kayah Society as a Function of the Shan-Burma-Karen Context.” In Contemporary Change in Traditional Societies, vol. 2, Asian Rural Societies, ed. Steward, Julian H., 1–104. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Lemoine, Jacques. 1997. “Feodalité Tai chez les Lü des Sipsong Panna et les Tai Blancs, Noirs et Rouges du Nord-Ouest du Viet-Nam.” Péninsule 35:171–217.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. [1949] 1967. The Elementary Structures of Kinship. Trans. Bell, James H., von Sturmer, John R., and Needham, Rodney. Boston: Beacon Press. [Originally published as Les structures élémentaires de la parenté. Paris: Mouton]Google Scholar
Lindell, Kristina, Samuelsson, Rolf, and Tayanin, Damrong. 1979. “Kinship and Marriage in Northern Kammu Villages: The Kinship Model.” Sociologus 29:60–84.Google Scholar
Liu, Jie. 1988. “The Situation of Cheli County.” Trans. Narramore, Terry. Thai-Yunnan Project Newsletter 2:6–9.Google Scholar
Liu, Rui. 1988. “A Preliminary Investigation of the Village Chieftain Administration in Jiadong, Jinghong Panna.” Trans. Terry Narramore. Thai-Yunnan Project Newsletter 2:9–14.Google Scholar
Löffler, Lorenz G. 1962. “Der Einfluß der Matripatrilokalität auf das Verwandtschaftsterminologiesystem der Lamet.” Zeitschrift für Ethnologie 87:12–20.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. 1982. Soziale Systeme: Grundriss einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. [1980] 1993. Gesellschaft und Semantik 1. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Needham, Rodney. 1960. “Alliance and Classification among the Lamet.” Sociologus 10:97–118.Google Scholar
Nutini, Hugo G. 1965. “Some Considerations on the Nature of Social-Structure and Model-Building: A Critique of Claude Lévi-Strauss and Edmund Leach.” American Anthropologist 67 (3): 707–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkin, Robert J. 1990. “Ladders and Circles: Affinal Alliance and the Problem of Hierarchy.” Man 25:472–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, Heather. 1990. “Buddhism and Ethnicity among the Tai Lue in the Sipsòngpanna.” In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Thai Studies, vol. 3, 339–52. Kunming: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Proschan, Frank. 2001. “People of the Gourd: Imagined Ethnicities in Highland Southeast Asia.” Journal of Asian Studies 60 (4): 999–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sethakul, Ratanaporn. 2000. “Tai Lue of Sipsòngpanna and Muang Nan in the Nineteenth-Century.” In Civility and Savagery: Social Identity in Tai States, ed. Turton, Andrew, 319–29. Richmond: Curzon.Google Scholar
Reinach de, Lucien. 1911. Le Laos. Paris: Guilmoto.Google Scholar
Robinne, François, and Sadan, Mandy, eds. 2007. Social Dynamics in the Highlands of Southeast Asia: Reconsidering Political Systems of Highland Burma by E. R. Leach. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Susan D., ed. 1989. Ritual, Power, and Economy: Upland-Lowland Contrasts in Mainland Southeast Asia. De Kalb: Northern Illinois University, Center for Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall. 1985. Islands of History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 2009. The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Song, En-Chang. 1989. “An Investigation of Marriage among the Tai of Sipsòng Panna.” Trans. Narramore, Terry. Thai-Yunnan Project Newsletter 4:10–14.Google Scholar
Watthanakul, Songsak Prang. 1988. “Thai Lue in Lanna: Some Preliminary Observations.” Thai-Yunnan Project Newsletter 1:4–6.Google Scholar
Photisane, Souneth. 1996. “The Nidan Khun Borom: Annotated Translation and Analysis.” PhD diss., University of Queensland.Google Scholar
Sprenger, Guido. 2006a. “Bone Transfers: Incomplete Replacement in Rmeet Ritual Exchange.” Taiwan Journal of Anthropology 4 (1): 79–112.Google Scholar
Sprenger, Guido. 2006b. Die Männer, die den Geldbaum fällten: Konzepte von Austausch und Gesellschaft bei den Rmeet von Takheung, Laos. Berlin: LitVerlag.Google Scholar
Sprenger, Guido. 2006c. “The End of Rituals: A Dialogue of Theory and Ethnography in Laos.” Paideuma 52:51–72.Google Scholar
Sprenger, Guido. 2006d. “Out of the Ashes: Swidden Cultivation in Highland Laos.” Anthropology Today 22 (4): 9–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprenger, Guido. 2006e. “Political Periphery, Cosmological Center: The Reproduction of Rmeet Socio-Cosmic Order and the Laos-Thailand Border.” In Centering the Margin: Agency and Narrative in Southeast Asian Borderlands, ed. Horstmann, Alexander and Wadley, Reed L., 67–84. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Sprenger, Guido. 2007. “From Kettledrums to Coins: Social Transformation and the Flow of Valuables in Northern Laos.” In Social Dynamics in the Highlands of Southeast Asia: Reconsidering Political Systems of Highland Burma by E. R. Leach, ed. Robinne, François and Sadan, Mandy, 161–85. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprenger, Guido. 2008. “Do the Rmeet Have Clans?” In Nouvelles recherches sur le Laos, ed. Lorrillard, Michel and Goudineau, Yves, 559–78. Paris: Ècole française de l'Extrême-Orient.Google Scholar
Steering Committee for Census of Population and Housing. 2006. Results from the Population and Housing Census 2005. Vientiane: n.p.Google Scholar
Tambiah, Stanley J. 1985. “The Galactic Polity in Southeast Asia.” In Culture, Thought, and Social Action: An Anthropological Perspective, by Stanley J. Tambiah, 252–86. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tambiah, Stanley J. 2002. Edmund Leach: An Anthropological Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tooker, Deborah. 1991. “Asymmetric Alliance in a Non-Stratified Society: Mechanisms of Egalitarianism among the Akha.” Paper presented to the American Anthropological Association, Chicago, November 22.Google Scholar
Tooker, Deborah. 1996. “Putting the Mandala in Its Place: A Practice-Based Approach to the Spatialization of Power on the Southeast Asian ‘Periphery’—The Case of the Akha.” Journal of Asian Studies 55 (2): 323–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turton, Andrew, ed. 2000. Civility and Savagery: Social identity in Tai States. Richmond: Curzon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zheng, Xiaoyun. 1990. “The Dai Nationality in Xishuangbanna: Their Present-Day Sociocultural Changes.” In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Thai Studies, vol. 2, 288–301. Kunming: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar