Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T11:37:35.479Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Changes in Japanese Commerce in the Tokugawa Period

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

E. S. Crawcour
Get access

Extract

The development of commerce and the rise of a merchant class in Tokugawa Japan have deservedly received considerable attention from both Japanese and Western scholars. In Japan that interest would seem to have been prompted by the problem of the rôle of the pre-Restoration merchant class in the development of the modern capitalist Japanese economy. The study of this problem was characterized by a long controversy in which the Tokugawa merchants were depicted as either “progressive” or “feudalistic,” depending on the historical philosophy of the participants. The argument was conducted at a high level of generality and on both sides within frameworks derived from the leading European (mainly German) schools of economic history. For some time neither side seems to have doubted the applicability of these frameworks to Japan's experience, but the controversy did eventually lead to valuable detailed studies of Tokugawa commerce and to attempts to interpret Japan's economic development in its own terms. Among the first to do this were the members of the so-called “Kyoto School” under Professor E. Honjō.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 22 , Issue 4 , August 1963 , pp. 387 - 400
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 (New York: J. J. Augustin, 1958.)

2 Hall, John W., Japanese History — New Dimensions of Approach and Understanding, Publication No. 34, Service Center for Teachers of History (Washington, 1961), p. 39.Google Scholar

3 Takeshi, Toyoda, “Sengoku shokō no shōgyō tōsei” [Control of commerce by barons of the Sengoku period], Rekishigaku Kenkyū, XI (07–08 1941), 15–27.Google Scholar

4 San Dai-chōja.

5 Go-shuin. See Motojirō, Kawashima, Shuinsen Boeki-shi [History of Red Seal Ships Trade], 4th ed. (Osaka: Kōjinsha, 1942).Google Scholar

6 His original family name was Yoshida. See the inscription on his tombstone composed by Hayashi Dōshun and given in Yoshishige, Yamazaki, Kairoku [Records of the Sea], (Tokyo: Kokusho Kankōkai, 1915), p. 514Google Scholar. For his career in foreign trade see Kawashima, , pp. 210–256.Google Scholar

7 See Crawcour, E. S., “Some Observations on Merchants—a translation of Mitsui Takafusa's Chōnin Kōken Roku,” Transactions of the Asiatic Society of Japan, VIII (12 1961), 55–56.Google Scholar

8 Tokō, Kanzawa, Okinagusa, Sect. 195 in Nihon Zuihitsu Taisei, Third series, XIII, 826.Google Scholar

9 Yasunao, Nakada, “Itowappu no hensen”Google Scholar [Changes in the Itowappu] in Itō Tazaburō, ed. Kokumin Seikatsu-shi kenkyū [Studies in the History of the Life of the People], II, Seikatsu to Shakai Keizai [Life and Social Economy] (Tokyo: Yoshikawa Kōbunkan, 1959) pp. 369–429.Google Scholar

10 Naotarō, Sekiyama, “Kyōto Itowappu nakama no chūsen jigyō” [The minting operations of the Kyoto Itowappu], Keizaishi Kenkyū, XIV (10 1955), 20–28.Google Scholar

11 Yasunao, Nakada, “Edo jidai no gofukushi” [The official drapers of the Edo period], Rekishi Kyōiku, IX (10 1961), 12–22.Google Scholar

12 No relation to Nuinosuke, who was known as “Gofuku Gotō” to distinguish him from Shōzaburō, known as “Kinza Gotō.”

13 The fate of a number of others of the same sort is recorded in Chōnin Kōken Roku.

14 See Seiichi, Andō, Kinsei Zaikata Shōgyō no Kenkyū [A Study of Rural Commerce in the Tokugawa period] (Tokyo: Yoshikawa Kōbunkan, 1958), especially pp. 388–402.Google Scholar

15 See Dōjima Kyūki [Records of Dōjima] in Tokugawa Jidai Shōgyō Sōsho [Collection of Writings on Tokugawa Period Commerce] (Tokyo: Kokusho Kankōkai, 1913) II, 27Google Scholar. See also Shōhei, Suzuki, Dōjima Kome-ichiba Shi [History of the Dōjima Rice Market] (Tokyo: Nihon Hyōronsha, 1940).Google Scholar

16 An account of the way in which Hiranoya Gohei acted as kuramoto and kakeya for the Tokuyama han is given in Yosoburo, Takekoshi, The Economic Aspects of the History of the Civilization of Japan (London, 1930), III, 97–101.Google Scholar

17 Op. cit., p. 103.

18 Taking as a rough guide the figures given for shogunal revenue for 1716 in Ōkurashō [Ministry of Finance] ed. Nihon Zaisei Keizai Shiryō [Materials on Japanese Finance and Economics] (Tokyo: Zaisei Keizai Gakkai, 1922), I, 31.Google Scholar

19 The annual accounts of Kōnoikeya Zen'emon have been analyzed by Yasuoka Shigeaki in “Zenkiteki shihon no chikuseki katei” [The process of accumulation of pre-modern capital], Dōshisha Shōgaku, XI, No. 5 (1960)Google Scholar and II, Nos. 2, 4 and 5 (1961).

20 I have excluded loans to other branches of the Kōnoike family which were more in the nature of subscriptions of capital. Conversions from kamme to ryō are at the rate of exchange used in the accounts for the year in question.

21 The following is taken mainly from Mataji, Miyamoto, Kōnoide Zen'emon (Tokyo: Yoshikawa Kōbunkan, 1958).Google Scholar

22 See Crawcour, E. S., “The Development of a Credit System in Seventeenth-century Japan,” Journal of Economic History, XXI (09 1961), 342–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

23 That is, the right to receive the tax income on land rated at 10,000 koku. koku = approximately 5 bushels.

24 See Takekoshi, , III, 329–337.Google Scholar

25 In the case of Kōnoikeya, the Meiji Government assumed responsibility for only about a quarter of the claims, which totalled close to 1.5 million yen. Miyamoto, pp. 233–234; Gakkai, Nihon Rekishi, ed. Jimbutsu Sōsho Furoku, No. 13 (09 1958)Google Scholar, Yoshikawa Kōbunkan.

26 Hansai Shobun Roku, in Ōuchi and Tsuchiya, ed. Meiji Zenki Zaisei Keizai Shiryō Shūsei [Collected materials on finance and economics in the early Meiji period] (Tokyo: Kaizōsha, 1932), Vol. IX.Google Scholar

27 See Crawcour, E. S., “Kawamura Zuiken—A Seventeenth Century Entrepreneur,”Google Scholar to be published in Transactions of the Asiatic Society of Japan, Vol. IX.

28 See Yasunao, Nakada, “Tenna nenkan shinkyū shōnin-sō no kōsō” [The struggle between old and new merchants during the Tenna era], Nihon Reiyshi, LXXI (05 1954), 21.Google Scholar

29 See Hall, John W., Tanuma Okitsugu, Forerunner of Modern Japan (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1955).Google Scholar

30 In 1815, for example, Ōmi merchants introduced sericulture to the Tanabe han in return for the exclusive right to buy the product. See Andō, , pp. 189–190.Google Scholar

31 A peasant uprising in Kii in 1855 protested against, among other things, the abolition of the han monopoly marketing board in its area. Andō, , p. 392.Google Scholar

32 See Shigeaki, Yasuoka, Nihon Hōken Keizai Seisakushi-ron [History of Japanese Feudal Economic Policy] (Tokyo: Yūhikaku, 1959), pp. 45–78.Google Scholar

33 Andō, , pp. 390–391.Google Scholar

34 Craig, Albert M., Chōshū in the Meiji Restoration (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1961), pp. 285–295.Google Scholar

35 Jansen, Marius B., Sakamoto Ryōma and the Meiji Restoration (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1961), p. 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

36 Andō, , p. 230.Google Scholar

87 Andō, , p. 236.Google Scholar

38 Andō, , p. 200.Google Scholar

39 Sheldon, , pp. 144–161.Google Scholar

40 Andō, , pp. 255–258.Google Scholar

41 Smith, Thomas C., “Landlords and Capitalists in the Modernization of Japan,” Journal of Economic History, XVI (1956), 169.Google Scholar

42 Masao, Adachi, Kinsei Zaigō Shonin no Keieishi [The business history of village merchants in the Tokugawa period], (Kyoto: Yūkonsha, 1955).Google Scholar

43 Smith, Thomas C., Political Change and Industrial Development in Japan: Government Enterprise 1868–1880 (Stanford, 1955), pp. 13–22Google Scholar. See also the same author's Agrarian Origins of Modern Japan (Stanford, 1959).Google Scholar