Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T12:08:02.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Caste, State, and Ethnic Boundaries in Nepal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

Nancy E. Levine
Get access

Extract

Models of ethnicity in Nepal stress, on the one hand, unlimited ethnic diversity and, on the other, a rather limited set of ethnic contrasts: Hindu versus Buddhist, tribe versus caste, mountain versus middle hills versus lowland Terai. However, ethnic relations in Humla District, in Nepal's far northwest Karnali Zone, are characterized more by interaction, interdependence, and mobility than contrasts and boundaries between groups.1 In Humla, individuals and even entire villages readily change their ethnic affiliation and their position in the caste system. There, too, ethnic groups are linked by a regional economic and social system, and changes in a group's ethnic affiliations are coincident with changes in their economy and style of life. Finally, the case of Humla reaffirms what other scholars have noted: ethnic relations today are the outcome of a historical process of accommodation between regional ethnic systems and the policies of a centralizing state.

Type
Women in Qing Period China—A Symposium
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , February 1987 , pp. 71 - 88
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Barth, F. 1969. “Introduction.” In Ethnic Groups and Boundaries, ed. by Barth, F., pp. 9–38. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Bennett, Lynn. 1983. Dangerous Wives and Sacred Sisters. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Berreman, Gerald D. 1960. “Cultural Variability and Drift in the Himalayan Hills.” American Anthropologist 62:774–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berreman, Gerald D. 1963. “Peoples and Cultures of the Himalayas.” Asian Survey 3:289–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bista, Dor Bahadur. 1971. “The Political Innovators of Upper Kali-Gandaki.” Man 6:52–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A. 1840. “Note on the Limboos and Other Hill Tribes Hitherto Un-describtd.” Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal 9:595–615.Google Scholar
Caplan, Lionel. 1970. Land and Social Change in East Nepal. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caplan, Lionel. 1973. “Inter-Caste Marriages in a Nepalese Town.” In Contributions to the Study of Nepal, ed. by von Fürer-Haimendorf, C., pp. 40–61. Warminster: Aris and Phillips.Google Scholar
Dahal, Dilli Ram. 1978. “Tribalism as an Incongruous Concept in Modern Nepal.” Colloques Internationaux du Vlth European Conference on Modern South Asian Studies, MS.Google Scholar
Dumont, Louis. 1970. Homo Hierarchkus. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, James F. 1978. “Homo hierarchkus Nepalensis: A Cultural Subspecies.” In Himalayan Anthropology, ed. by Fisher, James F., pp. 43–52. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fürer-Haimendorf, Christoph von. 1960. “Caste in the Multi-Ethnic Society of Nepal.” Contributions to Indian Sociology 4:12–32.Google Scholar
Fürer-Haimendorf, Christoph von. 1966. “Unity and Diversity in the Chetri Caste of Nepal.” In Caste and Kin in Nepal, India and Ceylon, ed. by von Fürer-Haimendorf, C., pp. 11–67. London: Asia Publishing House.Google Scholar
Fürer-Haimendorf, Christoph von. 1971. “Status and Interaction Among the High Hindu Castes of Nepal.” The Eastern Anthropologist 24:7–24.Google Scholar
Fürer-Haimendorf, Christoph von. 1975. Himalayan Traders. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Gray, John N. 1983. “Domestic Enterprise and Social Relations in a Nepalese Village.” Contributions to Indian Sociology 17:245–74.Google Scholar
Hagen, Toni. 1971. Nepal: The Kingdom in the Himalayas. New York: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Francis Buchanan. 1971. An Account of the Kingdom of Nepal. New Delhi: Manjusri Publishing House. (Orig. pub., 1819)Google Scholar
Hitchcock, John T. 1965. “Sub-Tribes in the Magar Community in Nepal.” Asian Survey 5:207–15.Google Scholar
Höfer, András. 1979. The Caste Hierarchy and the State in Nepal: A Study of the Mulukiv Ain of 1854. Innsbruck: Universitätsverlag Wagner.Google Scholar
Höfer, András. 1981. Tamang Ritual Texts 1. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Holmberg, David. N.d. “Tamang Comparatively Reconstructed.” MS.Google Scholar
Iijima, Shigeru. 1977. “Ecology, Economy and Cultural Change among the Thakalis in the Himalayas of Central Nepal.” In Changing Aspects of Modern Nepal, ed. By Iijima, Shigeru, pp. 69–92. Monumenta Serindica, no. 1. Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa.Google Scholar
Jones, Rex L. 1976. “Sanskritization in Eastern Nepal.” Ethnology 15:63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, Edmund R. 1965. Political Systems of Highland Burma. Boston: Beacon Press. (Orig. pub., 1954)Google Scholar
Levine, Nancy E. N.d.a. “Metamorphosis and Interchange: Ethnic Relations in Northwest Nepal.” MS.Google Scholar
Levine, Nancy E. N.d.b. “Circles of Kin. Polyandry and Population on the Tibetan Border.” MS.Google Scholar
McDougal, Charles. 1973. “Structure and Division in Kulunge Rai Society.” Kailash 1:205–24.Google Scholar
Manzardo, Andrew, Dahal, Dilli Ram, and Rai, Navin Kumar. 1976. “The Byanshi: An Ethnographic Note on a Trading Group in Far Western Nepal.” Contributions to Nepalese Studies. 3:83–118.Google ScholarPubMed
Messerschmidt, Don, and Gurung, Nareshwar J.. 1973. “Parallel Trade and Innovation in Central Nepal: The Cases of the Gurung and Thakali Subbas Compared.” In Contributions to the Anthropology of Nepal, ed. by von Fürer-Haimendorf, C., pp. 197–221. Warminster: Aris and Phillips.Google Scholar
Moore, Sally Falk. 1978. Law as Process. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Nepal, His Majesty's Government. 1984a. Population Census-1981: General Characteristics Tables, Vol. I—Part I. Kathmandu: Central Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
Nepal, His Majesty's Government. 1984b. Population Census-1981. Social Characteristics Tables, Vol. I—Part III. Kathmandu, Nepal: Central Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
Oppitz, Michael. 1974. “Myths and Facts: Reconsidering Some Data Concerning the Clan History of the Sherpa.” Kailash 2:121–31.Google Scholar
Parker, Barbara. N.d. “Wealth, Caste and Ethnic Boundaries: Who is the Real Thakali?” MS.Google Scholar
Petech, Luciano. 1984. Medieval History of Nepal. 2nd ed.Rome: Serie Orientale Roma.Google Scholar
Rauber, Hanna. 1980. “The Humli-Khyambas of Far Western Nepal: A Study in Ethnogenesis.” Contributions to Nepalese Studies 8:57–79.Google Scholar
Regmi, Mahesh C. 1965. Land Tenure and Taxation in Nepal. Volume III. Institute of International Studies. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sharma, Prayag R. 1971. “The Matawali Chhetris of Western Nepal.” Himalayan Review 4:43–60.Google Scholar
Sharma, Prayag R. 1972. Preliminary Study of Art and Architecture of the Karnali Basin, West Nepal. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
Sharma, Prayag R. 1977. “Caste, Social Mobility and Sanskritization in a Tribal-Hindu Society: A Study of Nepal's Old Legal Code.” In Changing Aspects of Modern Nepal, ed. by Iijima, Shigeru, pp. 93–118. Monumenta Serindica, no. 1. Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa.Google Scholar
Stiller, Ludwig F. 1973. The Rise of the House of Gorkha. Kathmandu: Ratna Pustak.Google Scholar