Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T16:23:30.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Blank Spaces and Secret Histories: Questions of Historiographic Epistemology in Medieval China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2010

Jack W. Chen
Get access

Abstract

Historiography has long been concerned with the problem of determining standards for evidence. For traditional Chinese historians, it was Confucius who provided the model for historical writing. As the attributed author of the Springs and Autumns, Confucius demonstrated qualities of narratival restraint, historical factuality, moral profundity, and a refusal to engage in idle speculation. Of course, his model was not an easy one to emulate, and later historical writings have drawn on both the factual records of the imperial court (which were not always factual or free of ideological interests) and nonofficial sources, such as private accounts, anecdotal literature, and hearsay. The present essay focuses on this intersection between anecdotal sources and historiography. This is precisely the point when historiography must reflect on its narrative condition, as narrative has interests other than factuality or moral truth. The author shows how the historiographic anxiety over unreliable sources has often coexisted with a fascination with anecdotal stories and gossip.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 69 , Issue 4 , November 2010 , pp. 1071 - 1091
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of Characters

Ban Gu 班固

biji 筆記

chuanqi 傳奇

Chunqiu 春秋

“Chunqiu huowen” 春秋或問

“Diwang shici tu xu” 帝王世次圖序

Gongyang Gao 公羊高

Gongyang zhuan 公羊傳

Han shu 漢書

“Huo Xiaoyu zhuan” 霍小玉傳

Jiang Fang 蔣防

jingxueshi 經學史

Li Yi 李益

Liu Xie 劉勰

Liu Zhiji 劉知幾

Meng Haoran 孟浩然

ming 名

Ouyang Xiu 歐陽修

Shang shu 尚書

shi 史

shixueshi 史學史

Shi ji 史記

Shi tong 史通

“Shi zhuan” 史傳

Sima Guang 司馬光

Sima Qian 司馬遷

Song Qi 宋祁

Tang liudian 唐六典

wen 聞

Wenxin diaolong 文心雕龍

Wu Zhen 吳縝

xiaoshuo 小說

Xin Tang shu 新唐書

“Zashu” 雜述

Zhao Yi 趙翼

zi 字

List of References

Allen, Sarah. 2003. “Tang Stories: Tales and Texts.” PhD diss., Harvard University.Google Scholar
Gu 班固, Ban. 1962. Han shu 漢書 [History of the Han dynasty]. 8 vols. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.Google Scholar
Campany, Robert Ford. 1996. Strange Writing: Anomaly Accounts in Early Medieval China. Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar
Dunbar, Robin. 1998. Grooming, Gossip, and the Evolution of Language. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Egan, Ronald C. 1984. The Literary Works of Ou-yang Hsiu (1007–72). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frankel, Hans H. 1962. “T'ang Literati: A Composite Biography.” In Confucian Personalities, ed. Wright, Arthur F. and Twitchett, Denis, 65–83. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Frankel, Hans H. 1981. Biographies of Meng Hao-jan. 2nd ed.Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gluckman, Max. 1963. “Papers in Honor of Melville J. Herskovits: Gossip and Scandal .” Current Anthropology 4 (3): 307–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gossman, Lionel. 2003. “Anecdote and History.” History and Theory 42 (2): 143–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
郝至祥, Hao Zhixiang. 2006. Liang Tang shu shufa ji bifa bijiao yanjiu—jian Lun Xin Tang shu pifo shanshi 兩《唐書》書法暨筆法比較研究──兼論《新唐書》闢佛刪史 [Studies comparing the documentary and literary styles of the two Histories of the Tang, together with a discussion of the New Tang History's historical revisions controverting Buddhism]. Yonghe, Taibei xian: Hua mulan wenhua chubanshe.Google Scholar
Hargett, James M. 2002. “Sketches.” In The Columbia History of Chinese Literature, ed. Mair, Victor H., 560–65. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
胡寶國, Hu Baoguo. 2003. Han Tang jian shixue de fazhan 漢唐間史學的發展 [The development of historiography between the Han and Tang dynasties]. Beijing: Shangwu yinshuguan.Google Scholar
黃永年, Huang Yongnian. 1985. Jiu Tang shu yu Xin Tang shu 《舊唐書》與《新唐書》 [The Old History of the Tang and the New History of the Tang]. Beijing: Renmin chubanshe.Google Scholar
Hung, William. 1960. “The T'ang Bureau of Historiography before 708 .”Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 23 (1960): 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroll, Paul W. 1981. Meng Hao-jan. Boston: Twayne.Google Scholar
Lee, Thomas H. C. [Li Hongqi 李弘祺]. 1991. “Fan lun jindai Zhongguo shixue de fazhan yu yiyi—fu cong biji, zhaji, xiaoshuo dao shehui shi” 泛論近代中國史學的發展與意義──附論從筆記、劄記、小說到社會史 [A general discussion of the development and significance of modern Chinese historiography, with appended discussion: From notebook jottings, reading notes, and fiction to social history]. In Dushi de lequ 讀史的樂趣 [The pleasure of reading history], 180–224. Taibei: Yunchen wenhua shiye.Google Scholar
Lee, Thomas H. C. [Li Hongqi 李弘祺]. 2002. “New Directions in Northern Sung Historical Thinking.” In Turning Points in Comparative Historiography, ed. Wang, Edward Q. and Iggers, Georg, 59–87. Rochester, N.Y.: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
李昉, Li Fang, et al. , comps. 1961. Taiping guangji 太平廣記 [Broad records of the Taiping reign]. 10 vols. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.Google Scholar
李劍國, Li Jianguo. 1993. Tang Wudai zhiguai chuanqi xulu 唐五代志怪傳奇敘錄 [Bibliographic abstracts of Tang and Five Dynasties zhiguai and chuanqi]. 2 vols. Tianjin: Nankai daxue chubanshe.Google Scholar
李林甫, Li Linfu et al. 1992. Tang liudian 唐六典 [Six official divisions of the Tang]. Ed. 陳仲夫, Chen Zhongfu. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.Google Scholar
Liu, James T. C. 1967. Ou-yang Hsiu: An Eleventh-Century Neo-Confucianist. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
劉勰, Liu Xie. 1989. Wenxin diaolong yizheng 文心雕龍義證 [Significance and verifications of the Literary Mind and Carved Dragons]. Ed. 詹鍈, Zhan Ying. 3 vols. Shanghai: Shanghai guji chubanshe.Google Scholar
劉煦, Liu Xu, comp. 1975. Jiu Tang shu 舊唐書 [Old history of the Tang dynasty]. 16 vols. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.Google Scholar
劉知幾, Liu Zhiji. 1978. Shitong tongshi 史通通釋 [Comprehensive explications of Historiography Comprehended]. Ed. 浦起龍, Pu Qilong. 2 vols. Shanghai: Shanghai guji chubanshe.Google Scholar
Lu, Sheldon Hsiao-Peng. 1994. From Historicity to Fictionality: The Chinese Poetics of Narrative. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
魯訊, Lu Xun. 1973. Zhongguo xiaoshuo shilüe 中國小說史略 [An abbreviated history of Chinese fiction]. Beijing: Renmin wenxue chubanshe.Google Scholar
Lunyu jishi 論語集釋 [Collected explications of the Analects]. 1990. Ed. Cheng Shude 程樹德. 4 vols. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally E. 1984. “Rethinking Gossip and Scandal.” In Toward a General Theory of Social Control, vol. 1, The Fundamentals, ed. Black, Donald, 277–301. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ng, On-cho, and Wang, Q. Edward. 2005. Mirroring the Past: The Writing and Use of History in Imperial China. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar
Nienhauser, William H. Jr. 1998. “Creativity and Storytelling in the Ch'uan-ch'i: Shen Ya-chih's T'ang Tales .”Chinese Literature: Essays, Articles, Reviews 20:31–70.Google Scholar
歐陽修, Ouyang Xiu. 2001. Ouyang Xiu quanji 歐陽修全集 [Complete works of Ouyang Xiu]. Ed. Li Yi'an 李逸安. 6 vols. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.Google Scholar
Xiu, Ouyang, and 宋祁, Song Qi (998–1061), et al. , comps. 1975. Xin Tang shu 新唐書 [New history of the Tang dynasty]. 20 vols. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.Google Scholar
Owen, Stephen. 1996. The End of the Chinese “Middle Ages”: Essays in Mid-Tang Literary Culture. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plaks, Andrew H. 1977. “Towards a Critical Theory of Chinese Narrative.” In Chinese Narrative: Critical and Theoretical Essays, ed. Plaks, Andrew H., 309–52. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Edwin G. 1961. “Chinese Historical Criticism: Liu Chih-chi and Ssu-ma Kuang.” In Historians of China and Japan, ed. Beasley, W. G. and Pulleyblank, E. G., 135–66. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shih, Vincent Yu-Chung, trans. 1959. The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons by Liu Hsieh: A Study of Thought and Pattern in Chinese Literature. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Spacks, Patricia Meyer. 1985. Gossip. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Twitchett, Denis. 1992. The Writing of Official History under the T'ang. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Burton. 1958. Ssu-ma Chien, Grand Historian of China. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
吳縝, Wu Zhen. 1966. Xin Tang shu jiumiu 新唐書糾繆 [Correcting blunders in the New History of the Tang]. Taibei: Taiwan shangwu yinshuguan.Google Scholar
Yang, Lien-Sheng. 1961. “The Organization of Chinese Official Historiography: Principles and Methods of the Standard Histories from the T'ang through the Ming Dynasty.” In Historians of China and Japan, ed. Beasley, W. G. and Pulleyblank, E. G., 44–59. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
章群, Zhang Qun. 1999. Tongjian, Xin Tang shu yinyong biji xiaoshuo yanjiu 通鑑、新唐書引用筆記小說研究 [Studies on the citation of notebook jottings and fiction in the Comprehensive Mirror and New History of the Tang]. Taibei: Wenjin chubanshe.Google Scholar
Yi, Zhao. 1984. Nianer shi zhaji jiaozheng 廿二史劄記校證 [Edited verifications to Reading Notes on the Twenty-two Histories]. Ed. 王樹民, Wang Shumin. 2 vols. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 1984), 17.358.Google Scholar