Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T17:44:48.901Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

World View and Peasant Rebellion: Reflections on Post-Mao Historiography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

Kwang-Ching Liu
Get access

Abstract

This article is based on academic journals published in the People's Republic of China (PRC) from 1978 to early 1980 and analyzes the trend in post-Mao historiography regarding peasant rebellions. Previous belief in the revolutionary nature of peasant rebellions is being reversed, and their “anti-feudal” character being questioned. The question now is whether peasant rebellions, or even class struggle itself, constitute an important motive force for progress in Chinese history. Conflicting views persist, but overall a more negative view of peasant behavior has led many PRC writers to view the small producers' “patriarchy,” which fosters hierarchy and particularism, as a source of current bureaucratic problems.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , February 1981 , pp. 295 - 326
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gang, Bai (1). “Ping 'siren bang' zai nongmin zhanzheng shi lingyu li sub zhizao di hunluan ji qi fan geming benzhi” (A critique of the confusion created by the “Gang of Four” in the studies of peasant wars and its anti-revolutionary nature). ZGNM, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Gang, Bai (2). “Qing zhongye Bailian jiao qiyi meiyou tuidong shehui shengchan li di fazhan ma?” (Did the White Lotus Rebellion of the Late Qing give no impetus to the development of the society's productive forces?). GMRB, Jan. 29, 1980.Google Scholar
Ding, Bian. “Shengchan li he shengchan guanxi zhi jian di maodun shi dangqian woguo shehui di zhuyao maodun” (The contradiction between productive forces and relations of production is the principal contradiction in our society today). JXYYJ, 1979.2, pp. 69–71.Google Scholar
Chan, Hok-lam. “Pre-modern History.” In Thurston, and Parker, , eds., pp. 21–37.Google Scholar
Kehan, Chen. “Duiyu jieji guanxi di guji yao you zhengque taidu” (There must be a correct attitude in assessing class relationship). RMRB, Aug. 28, 1979.Google Scholar
Cohen, C. A.Karl Marx's Theory of History: A Defence. Princeton:.Princeton University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Cohen, Paul A., and Goldman, Merle. “Modern Chinese History.” In Thurston, and Parker, , eds., pp. 38–60.Google Scholar
Xueshe, Cun Cui, ed. Zhongguo nongmin zhanzheng wenti taolun ji (Collected articles on the problem of Chinese peasant wars). Hong Kong: Dadong, 1978.Google Scholar
Yi, Dai (1). “Guanyu lishi yanjiu zhong jieji douzheng lilun wenti di jidian kanfa” (Perspectives on the theoretical problem of class struggle in historical research). Originally in Sbehui kexueyanjiu, 1979.2. Republished in XHYB, 1979.7, pp. 72–77.Google Scholar
Yi, Dai (2). “Jieji douzheng nongmin zhanzheng bushi tuijin lishi di weiyi dongli” (Class struggle and peasant wars are not the only motive force pushing history forward). RMRB, Jan. 11, 1980. Extract of the preceding item.Google Scholar
Yi, Dai (3). “Shishi qiushi, yong-yu chuang-xin” (Seeking truth from facts: courage for innovation). LSYJ, 1978.8, pp. 3–8.Google Scholar
Shouhe, Ding. “Chen Duxiu he Xin qingnian” (Chen Duxiu and New Youth). LSYJ, 1979.5, pp. 37–58.Google Scholar
Chuping, Dong (1). “Lun pingjun zhuyi di gongguo yu nongmin zhanzheng di chengbai” (On the positive and negative aspects of equalizationism and the success or failure of peasant wars). LSYJ, 1980.1, pp. 11–20.Google Scholar
Chuping, Dong (2). “Shengchan li shi lishi fazhan di genben dongli” (Productive forces constitute the fundamental motive force in historical development). GMRB, Oct. 23, 1979.Google Scholar
Jian, Dong, “Yao Xueyin di lishi guan he ta suzao di Li Zicheng” (Yao Xueyin's view of history and the Li Zicheng sculptured by him). NJDX, 1978.4, pp. 87–93.Google Scholar
Wenlan, Fan. Zhongguo jindai shi (China's modern history). 2 vols. Beijing: Renmin, 1962.Google Scholar
Yongxiang, Fang. “Shengchan fangshi shi shehui fazhan di genben dongli” (The mode of production is the fundamental motive force of social development). AHSD, 1979.4, pp. 10–15.Google Scholar
Zhiguang, Fang (1). “Lun Taiping tianguo di pingdeng sixiang yu huangquan zhuyi” (On Taiping egalitarianism and monarchism). NJDX, 1978.4, pp. 50–57.Google Scholar
Zhiguang, Fang (2). “Taiping tianguo zhengquan xingzhi shitan” (Preliminary inquiry into the nature of the Taiping regime). NJDX, 1980.1, pp. 61–69.Google Scholar
Ding, Feng. “Shuli gongchan zhuyi shijie guan—zou lishi biyou zhi lu” (Establish the world view of Communism—follow history's necessary course). HQ, 1979–6, pp. 51–58.Google Scholar
Jicai, Feng and Dingxing, Li. Yiho tuan (The Boxers). 2 vols. Beijing: Renmin, 1977.Google Scholar
Feuerwerker, Albert, ed. History in Communist China. Cambridge, Mass.: The M.I.T. Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Yiling, Fu (1). Ming-Qing fengjian tudi suoyou zhi lungang (Salient aspects of the system of feudal land proprietorship in the Ming-Qing period). In press, summer 1980.Google Scholar
Yiling, Fu (2). “Ming-Qing shidai jieji guanxi di xin tansuo” (A new inquiry into the class relationships of the Ming-Qing period). ZGSYJ, 1979.4, pp. 65–74.Google Scholar
Yunzhi, Geng. “Hu Shi yu ‘Wusi’ shiqi di xin wenhua yundong” (Hu Shi and the new culture movement of the “May Fourth” period). LSYJ, 1979.5, pp. 59–79.Google Scholar
Kuixiang, Gu. “Qing mo Jindan Dao Jiao qiyi chutan” (Preliminary inquiry into the uprising of the Gold Pill's Way of the Late Qing). LNDX, 1980.2, pp. 45–50.Google Scholar
Yuming, Guo. “Shi-lun Zhang Loxing” (A preliminary appraisal of Zhang Loxing). SHSFX, 1979.2, pp. 107–16.Google Scholar
Harrison, James P.The Communists and Chinese Peasant Rebellions: A Study in the Rewriting of Chinese History. New York: Atheneum, 1969.Google Scholar
Huanchun, Hong. “Lun Ming mo nongmin zhengquan di geming xing he fengjian xing” (On the revolutionary and feudal nature of the Late Ming peasant regimes). NJDX, 1978.4, pp. 68–78.Google Scholar
Fuming, Hu. “Lun shehui fazhan di dongli” (On the motive force of social development). SHKXJK, 1980.1, pp. 9–22.Google Scholar
JFJB Commentator. “Zhengque renshi woguo jieji zhuang kuang di genben bianhua” (Correctly understand the fundamental change in the class situation of our country). JFJB, July 19, 1979.Google Scholar
Xueshi, Ji. “Dangqian woguo jieji douzheng di tedian” (The characteristics of class struggle in our country today). HQ, 1979.9, pp. 11–15.Google Scholar
Chunfeng, Jia and Mengkui, Wang (1). “Guanliao zhuyi, fengjian zhuanzhi yu xiao shengchan” (Bureaucratism, feudal authoritarianism, and small production). ZXYJ, 1979.3.Google Scholar
Chunfeng, Jia and Mengkui, Wang (2). “Shixian sige xiandai hua yu kefu guanliao zhuyi” (Realizing the Four Modernizations and overcoming bureaucratism). HQ, 1980.3, pp. 29–32.Google Scholar
Niandong, Jiang, Shaogeng, Li, and Pishan, Yang. “Zhengque renshi he chuli woguo xianshi di jieji douzheng” (Correctly understand and handle the actual class struggle of our country). SHKXZX, 1980.1, pp. 92–99.Google Scholar
Zhaocheng, Jiang. “Guan yu Zhu Yuanzhang ji chi zhengquan di bianzhi wenti” (On Zhu Yuanzhang and the problem of the transformation of his regime's nature). HZDX, 1980.1, pp. 46–52.Google Scholar
suo, Jindai shi yanjiu. “Yijiu qiba nian Zhongguo jindai shi lunwen ziliao suoyin shumu, I” (Bibliographical index of articles on modern Chinese history, 1978, I). Jindai shi yanjiu, 1979.2, pp. 263–312.Google Scholar
Rui, Jing and Zheng, Zhang. “Guanyu lishi fazhan dongli wenti di taolun” (Discussion on the motive force in historical development). GMRB, Oct. 30, 1979; XHYB, 1980.1, p. 53.Google Scholar
Xueyuan, Junshi Writing Group. “Guanyu jieji he jieji douzheng di jige wenti” (A few problems on classes and class struggle). GMRB, Aug. 22, 1979.Google Scholar
Honglin, Li. “Jian Bozan tongzhi shi nian ji” (In memory of Comrade Jian Bozan at the 10th anniversary of his death). LSYJ, 1978.9, pp. 27–47.Google Scholar
Kan, Li. “Nongmin zhanzheng di gaofeng yu Tianjing di beiju” (The climax of the peasant wars and the tragedy at the Taiping Heavenly Capital). ZGSH, 1980.1, pp. 101–18. English version in Social Science in China 1, 1 (March 1980): 130–55.Google Scholar
Lianke, Li. “Shi lun shengchan li di neibu dongli” (An essay on the internal motive force of productive forces). ZXYJ, 1980.3.Google Scholar
Wenzhi, Li. Wan Ming minbian (Popular uprisings of the Late Ming). Shanghai: Zhonghua, 1948.Google Scholar
Zehou, Li. “Taiping Tianguo sixiang sanlun” (Random thoughts on the Taiping ideology). LSYJ, 1978.7, pp. 56–66.Google Scholar
Zhenhong, Li. “Fengjian shidai di nongmin shi ‘geming minzhu zhuyi zhe’ ma?” (Were the peasants of the feudal age “revolutionary democrats”?). WSZ, 1980.1, pp. 46–52.Google Scholar
Xiao, Liang. “Nongmin zhanzheng di weida lishi zuoyong” (The great historical effect of peasant wars). LSYJ, 1974.1, pp. 18–28.Google Scholar
Yiqun, Liang. “Guanyu Taiping Tianguo xiaqu tudi guanxi wenti” (On the problem of agrarian relations in areas under Taiping rule). LSJX, 1980.2, pp. 44–48.Google Scholar
Chun, Lin. “Lun shengchan li zhai lishi fazhan zhong di zuoyong” (On the effects of productive forces upon historical development). LSYJ, 1977.5, pp. 37–53.Google Scholar
Daizhao, Lin and Xiaoqiu, Wang. “Lun 'Wusi' shiqi di baijia zhengming” (On the Hundred Schools contending in the “May Fourth” period). LSYJ, 1979.4, pp. 13–24.Google Scholar
Ganquan, Lin. “Lun Zhongguo fengjian dizhu jieji lishi diwei di zhuanhua” (On the transformation of the historical position of the Chinese feudal landlord class). SHKXZX, 1979.4, pp. 120–26.Google Scholar
Ranchang, Lin. “Shishi qiushi shi Mao Zedong sixiang di linghun” (Seeking truth from facts is the soul of the thought of Mao Zedong). LSYJ, 1978.12, pp. 3–12.Google Scholar
Zengping, Lin. “Taiping Tianguo geming tuidong Zhongguo ziben zhuyi fazhan di wenti youdai jin yibu tansuo” (The problem of the Taiping revolutionary movement pushing forward China's capitalistic development awaits further exploration). LSYJ, 1979.10, pp. 31–38.Google Scholar
Yaolun, Ling and Ti, Fei. “Li Xiucheng zai Jiang-Zhe diqu shixing di tudi zhengce shi touxiang zhuyi ma?” (Was the agrarian policy carried out by Li Xiucheng in Jiangsu and Zhejiang capitulationism?). SCDX, 1979.4, pp. 25–29.Google Scholar
Danian, Liu. “Guanyu lishi qianjin di dongli wenti” (On the problem of the motive force of historical progress). JDSYJ 1 (Oct. 1979):58–69.Google Scholar
Gangji, Liu. “Dangqian woguo shehui di zhuyao maodun shi shenme?” (What is the principal contradiction in Chinese society today?). JXYYJ, 1979–2, pp. 67–68.Google Scholar
Minghan, Liu and Zhihong, Zhang. “Wenyi fuxing shidai juren he kexue” (The age, the great men, and sciences in the Renaissance era). LSYJ, 1978.5, pp. 35–46.Google Scholar
Yao, Liu. “Chong Changjiang zhongxia you tiqu nongcun jingji di bianhua kan Taiping Tianguo geming di lishi zuoyong” (The historical effect of the Taiping revolution as seen in the changes in the rural economy in the middle and lower Yangtze region). LSYJ, 1979–6, pp. 32–48.Google Scholar
Zehua, Liu and Liansheng, Wang. “Guanyu lishi fazhan di dongli wenti” (The problem of the motive force of historical development). JXYYJ, 1979.2, pp. 26–33.Google Scholar
Zhongri, Liu and Shaoquan, Zhou. “Shiqi nian Zhongguo nongmin zhanzheng shi di yanjiu” (Research in the history of Chinese peasant wars over seventeen years [1949–1966]). ZGNM, pp. 26–47.Google Scholar
LSYJ Commentator. “Tichang butong xuepai pingdeng di taolun wenti” (Promoting discussion of problems by different schools of thought on an equal basis). LSYJ, 1978.12, pp. 13–15.Google Scholar
LSYJ Commentator. “Zhiyou zhong yu shi-shi cai neng zhong yu zhenli” (Only by being loyal to facts can one be loyal to truth). LSYJ, 1979.9, pp. 3–5.Google Scholar
Zuoxie, Lü. “Bianzheng di duidai lishi shang di nongmin geming zhanzheng” (Treat the peasant revolutionary wars in history dialectically). NJDX, 1978.4, pp. 58–67.Google Scholar
Jiaqi, Mao. “Jidu jiao Rujia sixiang he Hong Xiuquan” (Christianity, Confucianism, and Hong Xiuquan). NJDX, 1979–2, pp. 43–53.Google Scholar
Tse-tung, Mao (1). Quotations from Chairman Mao. Peking: Foreign Languages Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Tse-tung, Mao (2). Selected Works. 5 vols. New York: International Publishers, 1954–1961.Google Scholar
Tse-tung, Mao (3). Selected Works of Mao Tse-tung. Peking: Foreign Languages Press, vols. 1–3, 1965; vol. 4, 1961.Google Scholar
Zedong, Mao. Mao Zedong xuanji (Selected works of Mao Zedong). Beijing: Renmin, 3 vols., 1953; 4 vols., 1966.Google Scholar
Naquin, Susan. Millenarian Rebellion in China: The Eight Trigrams Uprising of 1813. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Prazniak, Roxann. “Tax Protest in Laiyang, Shandong, 1910: Commoner Organization versus the County Political Elite.” Modern China 6, 1 (Jan. 1980):41–71.Google Scholar
Xia, Qi. “Du Li Zicheng—Lun nongmin di geming minzhu zhuyi” (Reading Li Zicheng—on the peasants' revolutionary democracy). WSZ, 1978.6. Summarized in Li Zhenhong.Google Scholar
Hansheng, Qiu. “Song-Ming lixue yu zongfa sixiang” (Song-Ming Neo-Confucianism and the idea of the patrilineal kinship system). LSYJ, 1979.11, pp. 62–73.Google Scholar
Shusen, Qiu (1). “Gudai qiyi nongmin you mei you ziji di sixiang wuqi” (Did the rebelling peasants of the pre-modern period have their own ideological weapon?). NJDX, 1978.4, pp. 79–86.Google Scholar
Shusen, Qiu (2). “Jianchi Makesi zhuyi di lishi fazhan dongli lun” (Insist on the Marxist theory of motive force in history). NJDX, 1980.1, pp. 55–60.Google Scholar
Rawski, Evelyn S.Agricultural Change and Peasant Economy in South China. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheng, Rong (Wang Rongsheng). “Zhiyou nongmin zhanzheng caishi fengjian shehui fazhan di zhenzheng dongli ma?” (Did peasant wars alone form the real motive force in the development of [China's] feudal society?). LSYJ, 1979.4, pp. 49–56. Extract in RMRB, Jan. 1, 1980.Google Scholar
Shek, Richard. “The Revolt of the Zaili, Jindan Sects in Rehe (Jehol), 1891,” Modern China 6,2 (April 1980): 161–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dingping, Shen. “Guanyu fengjian shehui fazhan di dongli wenti” (On the problem of motive force in the development of feudal society). ZGSYJ, 1979.4, pp. 75–84.Google Scholar
Shaobin, Shi, ed. Zhongguo fengjian shehui nongmin zhanzheng wenti taolun ji (Collected articles on the problem of peasant wars in Chinese feudal society). Beijing: Sanlien, 1962.Google Scholar
Yikui, Shi and Shusen, Qiu. “Zai lun Zhu Yuanzhang ji qi zhengquan xingzhi di zhuanhua” (A further discussion on Zhu Yuanzhang and the transformation of his regime). NJDX, 1978.3, pp. 71–76.Google Scholar
“Shixue” (History supplement). GMRB.Google Scholar
Shitang, Song. “Shi lun lishi qianjin di dongli wenti” (A preliminary inquiry into the motive force of historical progress). JDSYJ, 1979.2 (Dec.):58–88.Google Scholar
Shitang, Song and Demao, Li (1). “Guanyu lishi qianjin di zhuyao dongli qi zhuanhua wenti” (On the problem of the principal motive force and its transformation in historical progress). JDSYJ, 1980.2, pp. 68–97.Google Scholar
Shitang, Song and Demao, Li (2). “Lishi fazhan di dongli shi shehui gezhong maodun di he li” (The motive force of historical development is the combined force of various social contradictions). GMRB, Jan. 15, 1980.Google Scholar
Shuangbi, Su (1). [Article on class struggle as the real motive force in historical development], Shehui kexueyanjiu, 1979–1983 Summarized in Jing Rui and Zhang Zheng.Google Scholar
Shuangbi, Su (2). “Jieji douzheng yu lishi kexue” (Class struggle and the historical science). ZGSYJ, 1980.1, pp. 160–68.Google Scholar
Daren, Sun (1). “Guanchuan yu renlei lishi di genben xing guilu” (The fundamental law running through human history). Shenxi Shida xuebao, 1979.3. Summarized in Jing Rui and Zhang Zheng.Google Scholar
Daren, Sun (2). “Yinggai zenyang gujia ‘ranbu zhengce’” (How to evaluate “concessionism”). GMRB, Sept. 20, 1965.Google Scholar
Yefang, Sun. “Shenmo shi shengchan li yiji shengchan li dingyi di jige zhenglun” (What are productive forces? Some controversies on their definition). JJYJ, 1980.1, pp. 28–37.Google Scholar
Yingxiang, Sun. “Lüe tan Taiping Tianguo di 'zhaojiu jiaoliang nashui'” (A note on the Taiping policy of “delivering grain and paying taxes as in the past”). NJDX, 1978.1, pp. 90–92.Google Scholar
Zuomin, Sun (1). “Jian guo sanshi nian lai Zhongguo nongmin zhanzheng shi yanjiu di huigu yu zhanwang” (Retrospect and prospect of research in the history of Chinese peasant wars during the thirty years since the establishment of the People's Republic of China). SDS, 1979.1, pp. 27–43.Google Scholar
Zuomin, Sun (2). Zhongguo nongmin zhanzheng wenti tansuo (An exploration of the problem of Chinese peasant wars). Shanghai: Xinzhishi, 1956.Google Scholar
Mingbang, Tang. “Shi lun woguo nongmin zhanzheng zhong di shenxue yiduan” (A preliminary inquiry into the theological heterodoxy behind Chinese peasant wars). WHDX, 1979.4, pp. 68–75.Google Scholar
Thurston, Anne F., and Parker, Jason H., eds. Humanistic and Social Science Research in China: Recent History and Future Prospects. New York: Social Science Research Council, 1980.Google Scholar
Chongqin, Tian. “Shehui jiben maodun shi shehui fazhan di jiben dongli” (Fundamental social contradictions constitute the basic motive force of social development). AHSD, 1979.4, pp. 3–9.Google Scholar
Jujian, Tian. “Jianlun qingguan shengcun di shehui turang” (A brief discussion of the social conditions providing fertile soil for [the concept of] incorrupt officials). GMRB, Jan. 22, 1980.Google Scholar
Chao, Tong. “Fengjian tongzhi jieji buhui zhudong tiaozheng zhengce” (The feudal ruling class could not adjust policies on its own initiative). GMRB, Nov. 6, 1979.Google Scholar
Volkoff, Alex, and Wickberg, Edgar. “New Directions in Chinese Historiography— Reappraising the Taiping: Notes and Comment,” Pacific Affairs 52,3 (Fall 1979):479–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wakeman, Frederic Jr. “The Shun Interregnum of 1644.” In Spence, Jonathan D. and Wills, John E. Jr., eds., From Ming to Ch'ing: Conquest, Region and Continuity in Seventeenth-Century China. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Guixiu, Wang and Xianyang, Zhang. “Woguo xian jieduan di jieji douzheng he renmin neibu maodun” (The present stage of class struggle among the people in our country and internal contradiction among the people). GMRB, Nov. 7, 1979.Google Scholar
Gungwu, Wang. “Juxtaposing Past and Present in China Today.” The China Quarterly 61 (March 1975): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hongjun, Wang. “Zhai Zhongguo fengjian shehui zhong 'shengchan li zenyang he jieji duikang tungshi fazhan'” (How did “productive forces develop simultaneously with class antagonism” in Chinese feudal society?). ZGLS, 1979.1, pp. 6–12.Google Scholar
Jincun, Wang. “Kexue zhai xiandai shengchan li fazhan zhorig di zuoyong” (The effects of science upon modern productive forces). JJYJ, 1979–4, pp. 29–34.Google Scholar
Qingcheng, Wang. “Recent Developments in the Study of the Taiping Kingdom—A Review of the 1979 Academic Symposium in Nanjing.” Social Science in China 1,1 (March 1980): 156–67.Google Scholar
Xiaoqiang, Wang (1). “Nongmin yu fan fengjian” (The peasants and the opposition to feudalism). LSYJ, 1979.10, pp. 3–12. Also in XHYB, 1979.12, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
Xiaoqiang, Wang (2). “Nongye shehui zhuyi pipan” (A critique of rural socialism). Nongyejingji wenti, 1980.2. Republished in XHYB, 1980.5, pp. 7–13.Google Scholar
Zimin, Wang. “Lun Hong Xiuquan di posu pingdeng sixiang he huangquan zhuyi” (On Hong Xiuquan's simple egalitarianism and monarchism). AHSD, 1979–3, pp. 53–62.Google Scholar
Junxiong, Weng. “Man tan Chenguan nianjian di zhengquan jigou he xingzheng xiaolu” (Notes on the political organs and administrative efficiency of the Chenguan period [627–49]). GMRB, March 19, 1980.Google Scholar
Wiens, Mi Chu (1). “Lord and Peasant: The Sixteenth to the Eighteenth Century.” Modern China 6,1 (Jan. 1980):57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiens, Mi Chu (2). “Masters and Bondservants: Peasant Rage in the Seventeenth Century.” Ming Studies 8 (Spring 1979): 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhenkun, Wu. “Shengchan li zhai lishi fazhan zhong qi jueding zuoyong” (Productive forces have the decisive effect in historical development). HQ, 1978.1, pp. 77–80.Google Scholar
Tianyou, Xie. “Ping jianguo yilai Zhongguo nongmin zhanzheng shi di yanjiu” (Review of research on the history of Chinese peasant wars since the establishment of the People's Republic of China). XHYB, 1979.11, pp. 88–90.Google Scholar
Fensi, Xing. “Ouzhou liangci weida di sixiang jiefang yundong” (Europe's two great movements for intellectual liberation). LSYJ, 1979.8, pp. 3–14.Google Scholar
Jiayan, Yan. “Li Zicheng chu tan” (A preliminary review of Li Zicheng). BJDX, 1978.3, pp. 84–93; 1979.1, 41–53.Google Scholar
Zhongkui, Yan. “Renlei di wuzhi jingji liyi shi lishi fazhan di genben dongli” (Human material economic interest is the basic motive force in historical development). GMRB, Jan. 15, 1980.Google Scholar
Jiping, Yang. “Chung fengjian shehui di queli kan lishi fazhan di dongli” (The motive force in historical development as seen in the consolidation of Chinese feudal society). GMRB, Jan. 15, 1980.Google Scholar
Shengmin, Yang (1). “Dui shengchan li di dongli zuoyong di jidian kanfa” (Some perspectives on the productive forces' functioning as motive force). GMRB, Nov. 6, 1979.Google Scholar
Shengmin, Yang (2). “Lüe tan lishi fazhan di dongli wenti” (A brief discussion of the motive forces in historical development). JXYYJ, 1979–4, pp. 75–80.Google Scholar
Xueyin, Yao (1). Li Zicheng. 2 vols. Beijing: Zhongguo qingnien, 1963. (Now revised and included in the following item.)Google Scholar
Xueyin, Yao (2). Li Zicheng. 5 vols. Beijing: Zhongguo qingnien, 1977. Selected chapters from vols. 1–2 are translated in Chinese Literature, 1978.4, pp. 10–61; 5, pp. 29–93; 6, pp. 35–86; 7, pp. 29–94; 8, pp. 76–103.Google Scholar
Xian-en, Ye. “Ming-Qing Huizhou dian-bu zhi shitan” (Preliminary inquiry into the tenant-bondservant system of Huizhou in the Ming-Qing period). ZSDX, 1979.2, pp. 57–84.Google Scholar
Eryu, Ying. “Lüe tan Yao Chong gaige” (A brief discussion of the reforms of Yao Chong [713–17]). GMRB, March 25, 1980.Google Scholar
Tianran, You, Zhisen, Yu, and Bo, Hong. “Cong Yingguo chanye geming lean tuidon. lishi qianjin di dongli” (The motive force pushing forward history as seen in the English industrial revolution). GMRB, Feb. 26, 1980.Google Scholar
Guoxiang, Zhang and Haiying, Zhang. “Jieji douzheng shi jieji shehui lishi fazhan di zhenzheng dongli” (Class struggle is the real motive force in the historical development of class society). GMRB, Oct. 30, 1979.Google Scholar
Haipeng, Zhang. “Lun lishi fazhan di dongli” (On the motive force of historical development). AHSD, 1979–4, pp. 16–23.Google Scholar
Jinfan, Zhang. “Jiazhang shi di lingdao zuofeng shi fengjian yudu” (The patriarchal, style of leadership is the poisonous legacy of feudalism). BJRB, Aug. 31, 1979. Republished in XHYB, 1979–11, pp. 81–82.Google Scholar
Jiqian, Zhang. “Lun Hong Xiuquan” (On Hong Xiuquan). ZHWS, 1979.4, pp. 202–20.Google Scholar
Wentian, Zhang. “Guanyu shengchan guanxi di liangchong xing wenti” (On the dual nature of relations of production). JJYJ, 1979.10, pp. 32–42.Google Scholar
Xuepin, Zhang. “Guanyu renmin neibu cunzai jieji douzheng di wenti” (On the problem of the existence of internal class struggle among the people). RMRB, Feb. 8, 1980.Google Scholar
Zhengyuan, Zhang and Zhifeng, Mi. “Lun renmin neibu jieji douzheng di lishi yanbian” (On the historical evolution of the internal class struggle among the people). AHSD, 1980.1, pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
Zhizhe, Zhang and Yijun, Luo. ‘“Shun liu er yu zhi genshi’—Lun Han chu fazhi yu shehui anding jingji fazhan” (“Follow the tide yet make a new beginning”: on the rule of law, social stability, and economic development of the early Han). GMRB, April 29, 1980.Google Scholar
Zuoyao, Zhang. “Zhongguo nongmin zhanzheng yu zongjiao di guanxi” (The relationship between Chinese peasant wars and religion). JDSYJ, 1980.2, pp. 98–115.Google Scholar
Keyao, Zhao and Daoxun, Xu. “Fengjian tongzhi jieji hui zhudong tiaozheng zhengce” (The feudal ruling class could take initiative in adjusting policy). GMRB, Feb. 26, 1980.Google Scholar
Jingwen, Zhong. “Wan Qing shiqi minjian wenyi xueshi shitan” (An exploration of the history of popular literature in the Late Qing period). BJSF, 1980.2, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
Kang, Zhou and Qihua, Cheng. “Renmin neibu meiyou jieji douzheng ma?” (Is there no internal class struggle among the people?). HQ, 1979.10, pp. 71–73.Google Scholar
Yuanbing, Zhou. “Jian lun gongchan zhuyi daode di shizhi” (An essay on the substance of Communist morality). SHSFD, 1979.3, pp. 13–21.Google Scholar
Ji, Zhuge. “Bo 'Siren bang' zai nongmin zhanzheng shang di fan Makesi zhuyi miu lun” (Refuting the absurd anti-Marxian opinion of the “Gang of Four” regarding peasant wars). LSYJ, 1977.1, pp. 46–59.Google Scholar