Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:16:28.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Vietnamese Kinship: Structural Principles and the Socialist Transformation in Northern Vietnam

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

Hy van Luong
Get access

Extract

In the literature on the process of socioeconomic transformation, a major debate centers on the questions of how and how much indigenous traditions, including kinship structures, are transformed by the larger political economic framework (Sahlins 1985, Hobsbawm 1983, Wolf 1982). Marxist theoretical analyses tend to emphasize the eventual demise of gender inequality and male-oriented (patrilineal, patrilocal, and patriarchical) kinship systems—kinship systems within which gender relations are also embedded (cf. Engels 1972). The analytical literature on Vietnamese kinship and gender in the socialist era is certainly not an exception in this regard. It is pervaded with general propositions regarding the nuclearization of the family (Houtart and Lemercinier 1981, Werner 1981) and the political-economy-based transformation of the system toward a structure of egalitarian gender relations (e.g., Lê thḷ Nhâm-Tuyêt 1973).

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 48 , Issue 4 , November 1989 , pp. 741 - 756
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

KhẰc, Chu. 1986. “Phụ nữ nông thôn có thực hiện đủợc quyền bình đằng vỘi nam giỘi không?” [Is gender equality achieved by rural women?]. Xā hội hộc [Sociology] 13:48–52.Google Scholar
Hiêú, Đinh Trọng. 1986. “Habitations vietnamiennes: Quelques relevés et commentaires” [Vietnamese habitations: Notes and comments]. Cahiers d'études vietnamiennes 7–8:90–137.Google Scholar
Long, Đỗ. 1985. “Tân lý xã hội truyêǹ thỗng và kễ hoạch dân sᷧ Việt Nam” [Traditional mentality and demographic planning in Vietnam]. Xã hại học [Sociology] 12:32–33, 41.Google Scholar
Thắng, Đoàn Kim. 1985. “Quan niệm của ngu'ởi nông dân về đẻ con trai và đẻ con gài” [Peasants' attitudes on the gender of children]. Xã hội học [Sociology] 12:42–45.Google Scholar
Thanh-Mai, Dưng thị. 1985. “Vấn đề hôn nhân qua khẚo sát thưc tếế ở một số nơi” [The question of marriage: Empirical research in a number of localities]. In Tình yêu, hôn nhân, gia đình trong xã hội ta [Love, marriage, and the family in our society], ed. học, Viện Xã Hội [Institute of Sociology], 64–68. Hanoi: Khoa học Xã hội.Google Scholar
Engels, Friedrich. 1972. The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State, ed. Leacock, Eleanor. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Fortes, Meyer. 1953. “The Structure of Unilineal Descent Groups.” American Anthropologist 55:17–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haines, David W. 1984. “Reflections of Kinship and Society Under Vietnam's Lê Dynasty.” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 15:307–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric. 1983. “Introduction.” In The Invention of Tradition, ed. Hobsbawm, E. and Ranger, T.. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Houtart, François, and Lemercinier, G.. 1981. La sociologie d'une commune vietnamienne [The sociology of a Vietnamese village]. Louvain-la-Neuve: Catholic University of Louvain.Google Scholar
Indochine, (Gouvernement Général de l'). 1931. Le Tonkin scolaire [Scholarly Tonkin]. Hanoi: Extrême-Orient.Google Scholar
Jamieson, Neil. 1984. “Toward a Paradigm for Paradox: Observations on the Study of Social Organization in Southeast Asia.” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 15:320–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Raymond. 1977. Etoro Social Structure. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Duấan, Lê. 1974. “Role and Tasks of the Vietnamese Woman in the New Revolutionary Stage.” In Lê Duấn, Some Present Tasks, 48–84. Hanoi: Foreign Language Publishing House.Google Scholar
Nhâm-Tuyềt, Lê thị. 1973. Phụ nư Việt Nam qua các thời Đại [Vietnamese women through different eras]. Hanoi: Khoa học x˜ hội.Google Scholar
Quề, Lê thị. 1986. “The Vietnamese Family Yesterday and Today.” Interculture 19 (Issue 92): 1–38.Google Scholar
Leach, Edmund. 1961. Rethinking Anthropology. London: Athlone.Google Scholar
Luong, Hy van. 1984. “‘Brother’ and ‘Uncle’: Rules, Structural Contradiction, and Meaning in Vietnamese Kinship.” American Anthropologist 86:290–315, 705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luong, Hy van. N.d.a. “Revolutionary Processes in a North Vietnamese Village: Discourse, Structure, and History.” Manuscript.Google Scholar
Luong, Hy van. N.d.b. “Relations of Production in a Northern Vietnamese Manufacturing Center: The Transformational Process from the Colonial to the Socialist Era.” Manuscript.Google Scholar
Thu Van, Mai. 1983. Vietnam: Un peuple, des voix [Vietnam: People and voices]. Paris: Pierre Horay.Google Scholar
Marr, David. 1981. Vietnamese Tradition on Trial, 1920–1945. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Murdock, Ġeorge Peter. 1949. Social Structure. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Chính, Ngô Thị. 1977. “Vài nét về người phụ nư¯ nông dân trong sẚn xuất nông nghiệp và trong mối quan hệ hôn nhân gia ฑình mới” [A sketch of woman cultivators in agricultural production and in new marital relations]. Tạp chí dân tộc học [Journal of ethnology] 3:61–70.Google Scholar
Chính, Ngô Thị and Long, Tạ. 1979. “Vài nét về quan hệ hôn nhân hiện đại ờ xã Cổ-Loa, huyện đông-Anh (Hà-Nội)” [A sketch of modern marriage relations in Co-Loa Village, Dong-Anh District (Hanoi)]. Nghiên-cứu Dân-tộc-học [Ethnological research] 1979: 57–58.Google Scholar
Nguyên, Nguyô¯n Xuân. 1942. “Enquêtes démographiques sur deux agglomérations annamites” [Demographic investigations of two Vietnamese settlements]. Bulletin de l'Institut Indochinois pour l'Etude de l'Homme 5, no. 2:129–36.Google Scholar
Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. 1965. Structure and Function in Primitive Society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Rambo, A. Terry. 1973. A Comparison of Peasant Social Systems of Northern and Southern Vietnam: A Study of Ecological Adaptation, Social Succession, and Cultural Evolution. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Center for Vietnamese Studies.Google Scholar
Rambo, A. Terry, and Jamieson, Neil L. III. 1973. Cultural Change in Rural Vietnam: A Study of the Effects of Long-Term Communist Control on the Social Structure, Attitudes, and Values of the Peasants of the Mekong Delta. The Asia Society, SEADAG Papers on Problems of Development in Southeast Asia. New York: The Asia Society.Google Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall. 1985. Islands of History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ứng, Tất et al. 1983. Như¯ng chuyện tbánh thần [Stories of superstition]. Vīnh Phú: Sở vǎn hóa và thông tin Vīnh Phú.Google Scholar
Quang, Trịnh Thị. 1984. “Mấy vấn đề về quan hệ thân tộc ở nông thôn” [Certain questions regarding kinship relations in the countryside]. Xā hội học [Sociology] 6:47–52.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor. 1974. Drama, Field, and Metaphors. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Werner, Jayne. 1981. “Women, Socialism, and the Economy of Wartime North Vietnam, 1960–1975.” Studies in Comparative Communism 14:165–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, Jayne. 1986. “The New Household, the New Family, and the Sexual Division of Labor in Post-war Vietnam.”Paper presented at the Social Science Research Council workshop on Kinship and Gender in Indochina,Dekalb, Illinois,July.Google Scholar
Whitmore, John K. 1984. “Social Organization and Confucian Thought in Vietnam.” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 15:296–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, Eric. 1982. Europe and the People Without History. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, Margery. 1972. Women and the Family in Rural Taiwan. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodside, Alexander. 1971. Vietnam and the Chinese Model. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar