Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:18:00.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Technology of Japanese Nationalism: The Local Improvement Movement, 1900–1918

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

Kenneth B. Pyle
Get access

Extract

Historians frequently describe the Russo-Japanese War as a time when Japan achieved great power status, won world acclaim, and fulfilled the Meiji dream. It was a landmark in modern world history: everywhere leaders of sujected peoples were inspired to believe that they too could import Western science and industry, rid themselves of white control, preserve their national character, and themselves oversee the process of industrialization. Jawaharlal Nehru, for example, records in his autobiography that the Japanese victories were a memorable event in his early life, describing them as “a great pick-me-up for Asia” which kindled his nationalism and his determination to “fight for India.” Eager to learn more of the Japanese experience, “I invested in a large number of books on Japan and tried to read some of them.” But he confesses ruefully (perhaps recalling an account of Bakumatsu politics?) “I felt rather lost in Japanese history.”!

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , November 1973 , pp. 51 - 65
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Toward Freedom (Cornwall, N. Y., 1941),pp. 29–30;Google Scholarsee also Nehru, Jawaharlal, Glimpses 0f World History (New York, 1942), p. 441.Google Scholar

2See essay, Natsumc's “Gendai no kaika” in Sōseki zenshū (Tokyo, 1936), XIII, 352–80.Google Scholar

3“Shōri no hiai,” Tokutomi Rokfa shū (Meiji bungaku zenshū, XLII), (Tokyo, 1966), pp. 366–368.Google Scholar

4Discussed in my The New Generation in Meiji Japan: Problems oj Cultural Identity, 1885–1895 (Stanford, 1969).Google Scholar

5Ohkawa, Kazushi and Rosovsky, Henry, “Economic Fluctuations in Prewar Japan: A Preliminary Analysis of Cycles and Long Swings,” Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, III (October 1962), 19.Google Scholar

6For a discussion of the literature see my “Some Recent Approaches to Japanese Nationalism, ” Journal of Asian Studies, XXXI, 5 (1971), 5–16.Google Scholar

7 Ibid.

8 “Nationalism,” Elic Kedouric writes in opening sentence of his book, “is a doctrine vented in Europe at the beginning of the nineteenth century.” A provocative sentence. The implication is that there was nothing inevitable or natural in the origins of modern nationalism. We might well have been without it, as Ernest Gellner says. This is not the place to pursue such issues, but Kcdourie's assertion does serve to emphasize the role of intellectual and political leadership in the making of nationalism. SeeKedourie, , Nationalism (London, 1960), p. 9. See also Ernest Gellner, Thought and Change (Chicago, 1964), p. 151.Google Scholar

9Taichirō, Mitani, Nikon scitō seiji no keisei (Tokyo, 1967), PP. 19–20.Google Scholar

10Kaigi, Nōshōkō Kōtō, sokkiroku, Giji, vol. 1, 1961, reprinted in Obama Ritei, ed., Meiji bunka shiryō sōsho, p. 50, quoted in R. P. Dore, “The Modernizer as a Special Case: Japanese Factory Legislation, 1882–1911, ” Comparative Studies in Society and History, XI, 4, (1969), 439.Google Scholar

11 Ibid., p. 446.

12Hiroaki, Matsuzaki, “Meiji shakaishugi no shisō, ” Nikon seiji gakkai nempō (1968), p. 18.Google Scholar

13Kōichi, Sckiya, “Nihon Shakai Scisaku Gakkai shi (2),” Shōgaku ronshū, XXVII (1958), 146.Google Scholar

14Teruhisa, Horio, “Taisei sai-tōgō no kokoromi to teikoku ideorogî no keisei,” Nihon seiji gakkai nempō (1968), p. 179.Google Scholar

15Sohō, Tokutomi, Kōshaku Katsura Tarō den (Meiji hyakunen shi sōsho, XLIX), (Tokyo, 1967), 348–349. Italics added.Google Scholar

16 Mitani, p. 21.

17Masanao, Kano, Shihonshugi keiseiki no chitsujo ishiki (Tokyo, 1969), pp. 459–460.Google Scholar

18 Mitani, p. 271.

19jiden, Sohō (Tokyo, 1935), p. 396. Quoted in Shumpei Okamoto, The Japanese Oligarchy and the Russo-Japanese War (New York, 1970), p. 126.Google Scholar

20Lockwood, William W., The Economic Development of Japan: Growth and Structural Change (Princeton, 1954), pp.Google Scholar 35, 522. See also Najita, Tetsuo, Hara Kei in the Politics of Compromise, 1905–1915 (Cambridge, Mass., 1967), p. 246.Google Scholar

21Masato, Miyaji, “Chihō kairyō undō no ronri to tenkai (1), ” Shigaku zasshi LXXIX, 8 (1970), 4–6.Google Scholar

22Dore, R. P., Land Reform in Japan (London, 1959) P. 57.Google Scholar

23Mikio, Sumiya, Nihon no shakai shisō (Tokyo, 1968), p. 68.Google Scholar

24Nōkai, Dai Nippon, ed., Yokpi Tokiyoshi zenshū (Tokyo, 1925), IV, 546–47.Google Scholar

25 Dore, Land Reform, p. 62.

26 Kano, Shihonshugi keiseiki, p. 459.

27 Ibid., pp. 458–59.

28Steiner, Kurt, Local Government in Japan (Stanford, 1965), p. 202.Google Scholar

29 Miyaji, “Chihō kairiō,” pp. 37–38.

30Takeshi, Ishida, Kindai Nihon seiji kōzō no kenkyū (Tokyo, 1956), p. 67.Google Scholar

31 Miyaji, p. 42.

32 D. C. Hokom, The Political Philosophy of Modern Shinto, A Study of the State Religion of Japan in Transactions of the Asiatic Society of Japan, Series 2, XLIX, 324.

33Fridell, W. M., The Policy of the Japanese Government Toward Shinto Shrines at the Town and Village Level, 1894–1914 (University of California, Berkeley, Ph.D. dissertation, 1970), pp. 328–29.Google Scholar

34 Holtom, pp. 40–41.

35 Holtom, p. 324.

36Shōzō, Fujita, Tennōsei kokka no shihai genri (Tokyo, 1966), p. 30.Google Scholar

37Takeshi, Ishid, Meiji seiji shisōshi no kenkyū (Tokyo, 1954). p. 182.Google Scholar

38 Sumiya, pp. 65–66.

39 Miyaji, “Chihō kairyō (2), Shigaku zasshi, LXXIX, 9 (1970), 78.

40Takenob, Y., ed., Japan Yearbook: 1914 (Tokyo, 1914), P. 305.Google Scholar

41II, Henry Dewitt Smith, Japan's First Student Radicals (Cambridge, Mass., 1972), p. 27.Google Scholar

42 Miyaji, “Chihō kairyō (2),” pp. 28–29.

43 Yokoi zenshū, IV, 585–86.

44Masanao, Kano, “Sengo keiei to nōson kyōiku,” Shisō, 521 (1967), 51Google Scholar

45Smethurst, Richard J., “The Creation of the Imperial Military Reserve Association,” Journal of Asian Studies, XXX, 4 (1971), 815–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

46Vogel, Ezra, Japan's New Middle Class (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 2nd. ed., 1971), pp. 255–256.Google Scholar

47 One may wonder to what extent Fritz Stern's remark about Germany is applicable to Japan: “With a suddeness that has had no parallel, the industrial revolution changed the face and character of German society. The story of that transformation is familiar enough; in the popular mind, the classical horrors of the industrial revolution are properly associated with England, not with Germany. The patent miseries of late eighteenth century industrialization did not appear in Germany. The real cost, the psychic cost, has been ignored. Yet the history of Germany from 1871 to 1945 records not only the most extreme antagonisms of an industrial society, but the violent resentment against the new industrialism, which in different guises erupted time and again in German life.” The Politics of Cultural Despair (Anchor edition, 1961). pp. 19–20.

48Bendix, , Nation-Building and Citizenship (New York, 1964), pp. 208–09.Google Scholar

49“The Opportunity of Japan,” Journal of Race Development, VI (July 1915). Reprinted in Veblen, Essays in Our Changing Order (New York, 1934), pp. 248–266.Google Scholar

50Dahrendorf, Ralf, Society and Democracy in Germany (New York, 1967), p. 40.Google Scholar

51 Ibid., p. 41.