Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T06:32:18.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

State and Dynasty in Archaic Yamato

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

Cornelius J. Kiley
Get access

Extract

Historicalscholarship in postwar Japan has exhibited a renewed interest in the origins of dynastic rule in Yamato, and the process leading to the establishment of the Yamato rulers as sovereigns of an imperial polity in the seventh century. New theories of dynastic origins have led to new controversies, and many of the most basic assuptions of prewar historians are now being abandoned. Among these, the previously sacrosanct idea of unbroken dynastic continuity, usually expressed by the slogan bansei ikkei, has been effectively challenged. This idea, an important element of state ritual from the seventh century onward, does not antedate that century. It follows that during the previous three hundred years, which witnessed the successive establishment of at least three different dynastic regimes in Yamato, the prevailing political structures and ideologies differed radically from those represented in the traditional histories, which were not completed until the early eighth century. The bases of royal legitimacy and the nature of the kingship itself very probably changed drastically in the process of development.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , November 1973 , pp. 25 - 49
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Namio, Egami, Kiba minzoku kokka: Nihon Kodaishi e no apurōchi (Tokyo, 1950).Google Scholar

2Yū, Mizuno, Zōtei Nihon kodai ōchō shiron josetsu (Tokyo, 1954).Google Scholar

3 Lawrence Krader, Formation of the State (Prentiss-Hall, 1968).

4 See Inoue Mitsusada, Nihon kokka no kigen(Tokyo, i960) and Nihon kodai kokka no kenkyū(Tokyo, 1965).

5 Ishii Ryōsuke, Tennō (Tokyo, 1950) is probably the best general history of the dynasty, and the periodization used in that work has been adopted here in distinguishing “archaic” from “ancient.”

6Rizō, Takeuchi, “Daiō tennō kō, ” in Takeuchi, Ritusyōsei to kizoku seikem I (Tokyo, 1957), 42–45;Google ScholarSekiyo, Shimoide, “Tennō shōgō to shinsenshisō no mondai, ” in Endō Motoo Hakushi Kanreki Kinenkai, eds., Nihon kodaishi ronshū (Tokyo, 1970), 1–16;Google ScholarIssho, Ōhashi, “Tennō gō seiritsu nojidai ni tsuite, ” Rekishi kyōiku 18 (1970) 52–67.Google Scholar

7See Tsunoda, Ryusaku, tr., and Carrington Goodrich, L., ed., Japan in the Chinese dynastic histories (Pasadena, 1951), 1–37.Google Scholar

8Mitsusada, Inou, “Teiki kara mita Kazurakiuji,” in Inoue, Nihon kodai kokka no kenkyū, 29–72.Google Scholar

9“Wo-jen ch'uan, ” San kuo chih, Wei shu, Po-na pen ed., ch. 30, 250–313;Google Scholarsee Young, John, The Location of Yamatai: A Case History in Japanese Historiography (Johns Hopkins, 1958); Inoue Mitsudacla, Nihon kokka no kigen, 40–69;Google ScholarRyōsuke, Ishii, “Tōgoku to saigoku: Jōdai oyobi jōsei niokeru, ” in Ishii, Taika no kaishin to Kamakura bakufu no seiritsu (Tokyo, 1958), 53–86.Google Scholar

10Goody, Jack, “Introduction, ” 44, in Goody, ed., Succession to High Office (Cambridge, 1966).Google Scholar

llSee Krader, , Formation of the State and E. E. Evans-Pritchard, “The Divine Kingship of the Shil-luk of the Nilotic Sudan,” in Evans-Pritchard, SocialAnthropology and Other Essays (Free Press, 1964), 192–212.Google Scholar

12 See note 3, above.

13Katsumi, Kuroita, Kōtei kokushi no kenkyū (Tokyo, 1931-IIA, 29–93; Robert Reischauer, Early Japanese History, 2 v. (Princeton, 1937).Google Scholar

14 See Reischauer, Early Japanese History, I, 9.

15 The weaknesses of this standard argument have been pointed out to me by Professor Gari Ledyard of Columbia University. I am very much indebted to Professor Ledyard for his criticisms of an earlier version of this paper.

16Sōkichi, Tsuda, “Kogo shūi no kenkyū: Fu, jōdai no be ni tsuite no kō, ” Shigaku zasshi XXXIX.9 (1928) 1–32, 10 (1928) 15–58, 11 (1928) 63–84, 12 (1928) 57–78,Google Scholar and “Jōdai no be ni tsuite no hokō,” Shigaku zasshi XL.i (1929) 64–90, 2 (1929)33–52, 4 (1929) 40–65.Google Scholar

17For a further discussion of this, see Kojirō, Naoki, “Nihon kodai no uji,” Kodaishi kōza VI (1962), 271–303Google Scholar and Akira, Seki, “Nihon kodai no mibun to kaikyō,” Kodaishi kōza VII (1963), 210–239.Google Scholar

18 See note 16, above.

19 See notes 3 and 16, above.

20Kojiro, Naoki, “Buminsei no ikkōsatsu,” in Naoki, Nihon kodai kpkka no kōzō (Tokyo, 1958), 7–42;Google ScholarTstsusaburō, Hayashiya “Buminsei no seiritsu, ” in Nishida Sensei Kiju Kinenkai, ed., Nihon kodai ronsō (Tokyo, 1960), 527–540.Google Scholar

21 See note 3, above.

22See Kaoru, Nakada, “Kabane ko,” in Nakada, Hōseishi ronshū III (Tokyo, 1937), 1027–1029.Google Scholar

23 See note 1, above.

24Naoki Kōjirō, , “Ōjin ōchōron josetsu,” in Naoki, Nihon kodai no shizoku to tennō (Tokyo, 1969), 173–200.Google Scholar

25shu, Sung, “Wo-kuo, ” Po-na pen ed., ch. 97, 23b–25C.Google Scholar

26See Shō, Ishimoda, Kodai kizoku no eiyū jidai (Tokyo, 1958).Google Scholar

27Shō, Ishimoda, “Kodaishi gairon, ” in lwanami kōza Nihon rekishi I (Tokyo, 1962), 1–75.Google Scholar

28 See note 2, above.

29Nihon shoki, maki 23, Taika (1645), 7, 10; Kokiishi taikei ed., II, 48; Aston, tr., Nihongi (London, 1956) II, 199; see Ishii Ryōsuke, Tennō, 49.Google Scholar

30Koyata, Iwahashi, “Tenchi Tennō no tatetamaishi tsune no nori, ” Iwahashi, jōdai shiseki no kenkyū (Tokyo, 1956–1968), II, 1–10;Google ScholarShigeo, Kitayama, Nihon kodai seijishi no kenkyū (Tokyo, 1959),Google Scholar 112; Rikurō, Hayashi, “Tempyō no byōdō to kanjin kosei no hcnka”, Rekishigaku kenkyū 228 (1959) 17–25;Google ScholarIsshō, Ōhashi, “Tennō gō seiritsu no jidai ni tsuite,” Rekishi kyōiku 18 (1970) 52–67;Google ScholarKojirō, Naoki, Jinshin no ran (Tokyo, 1961), 37–50;Google ScholarEnchō, Tamura, “Fukai jōten kō, ” Takeuchi Rizō Hakushi Kanreki Kinenkai, eds., Ritsuryō kokka t0 kizoku shakai (Tokyo, 1969), 31–75.Google Scholar

31 See notes i and 3, above.

32 See note 10, above.

33On the queen, see Mitsusada, Inoue, “Kodai no nyotei, ” in Nihon kodai kokka no kenkyū, 223–253;Google ScholarTaku, Tanaka, “Nakatsunagi o meguru shomondai, ” Nihon Gakushiin kiyō IX.2 (1951) 143–164;Google ScholarToshio, Kishi, “Kōmyō rikkō no shiteki igi, ” in Kishi, Nihon kodai seijishi kenkyū. (Tokyo, 1966), 213–255Google Scholar and Noboru, Nambu, “Nyotei tochokkei kōi keishō,” Nihon rekishi 282 (1971) 10–21.Google Scholar On the heir apparent, seeSaburō, lenaga, “Asuka chō no okeru sesshō seiji no honshitsu, ” Shakai keizai shigaku VIII.6 (1938) 31–54Google Scholar and Mitsudada, Inoue, “Kodai no kōtaishi, ” in Nihon Kodai kokka no Kenkyū, 179–222.Google Scholar

34 See note 10, above.

35shoki, Nihon, maki 23, Kōtoku preaccession, Kokushi taikei ed. II, 215, 216; Aston, tr., Nihongi II, 195–196.Google Scholar

36 See note 33, above.

37 See note 30, above.

38 See note 14, above.

39Schapera, I., “Kinship and marriage among the Tswana, ” in Brown, Radcliffe-, et al. , eds., African Systems of Kinship and Marriage (Oxford, 1950), 140–165, 163.Google Scholar

40 See note 14, above.

41See notes 30 and 44, above; also, Akizō, Nakamura, “Taika zendai no kōi keishōhō shiron, ” Nihon rekishi 275 (1971) 30–42, 276 (1971), 84–100.Google Scholar

42 Karl A. Wittfogel and Feng Chia-sheng, History of Chinese Society: Liao (907–1125) (Mac-Millan, 1946), 206–212, n. 72, 237–238.

43Yasukazu, Suematsu, Shiragi shi no shomondai (Tokyo, 1954), 1–205.Google Scholar

44 See note 42, above.

45 All code rules relating to the inheritance of royal status and the marriage of princesses, together with several modifying regulations, may be found in Ryō no shūge, maki 17, Keishiryō; Kolkushi taikai ed., 519–525.

46 Ishii Ryōsuke, Tennō, 34–40.

47 See note 22, above.

48 See note 17, above.

49Wajin, Kasai, “Kiki keifu no seiritsu katei ni tsuite, ” Shirin XL.2 (1957) 28–44.Google Scholar

50 See note 1 1 , above.

51 See note 8, above.

52 See note 24, above.

53See note 1, above and Toshio, Fukuyama, “Isonokami Jingū no shichishitō, ” Bijutsu kenkyū 158 (1951) 8–38.Google Scholar

54 See note 27, above.

55Yasukazu, Suematsu, Mimana kōbō shi (Tokyo, 1949), 37–78.Google Scholar

56Tarō, Sakamoto, “Nihon shoki, ” in Sakamoto et als., eds., Kokushi taikei shomoku kaidai, I (Tokyo, 1971) 1–24.Google Scholar

57 See note 55, above.

58 Egami, Kiba minzoku kokka, 134–198.

50 See note 8, above.

60Reiji, Harashima, Wa no goō to sono zengo (Tokyo, 1970).Google Scholar

61 Sec note 6o, above.

62 See Inoue, “Teiki kara mita Kazuraki uji,” n. 12, Nihon kodai kokka no kenkyū, 70.

63 See Figures I and III.

64 Mizuno Yū, Zōtei Nihon kpdai ōchō shiron josetsu, 63–107.

65 See note 60, above.

66 See note 6o, above.

67 See notes 49 and 60, above.

68 Goody, “Introduction,” Succession to High Office, 31.

69Inoue, Nihon kokka no Kigen, 118; Yukihisa, Yamao, “Kofun kinsekibun, ” Nihonshi kenkyū 130 (1973) 120–122.Google Scholar

70 See note 68, above.

71shoki, Nihon, maki 13, Ankō 1, 2, 1; Kokushi taikei ed., I, 352–353; Aston, tr., Nihongi, I, 332; Kojiki, maki 3. Ankō, Kokushi taikei ed., 128–129, Philippi, tr., Kojiki (Tokyo, 1969), 341–342.Google Scholar

72See Iwao, Yoshii, Tennō no keifu to shinwa (Tokyo, 1967), 165–166.Google Scholar

73 See note 64, above.

74 See note 68, above.

75 See note io, above; Nihon shoki, maki 12, Richū preaccession; Kokushi taikei ed., I, 321–326; Aston, tr., Nihongi, I, 301–326; Kojiki, maki 3, Richū, Kokushi taikei ed., 120–124; Philippi, tr., Kojiki, 324–329.

76shoki, Nihon, miaki 14, Yūryaku preacccssion, Kokushi taikei ed., I, 357–359; Aston, tr., Nihongi, I, 334–336; Kojiki, maki 2, Ankō; Philippi, tr., Kojiki, 360–361.Google Scholar

77Mitsusada, Inoue, “Kodai kokka no shodankai,” in Inoue, Nihon kpdai kokka no kenkyū, 527–638.Google Scholar

78 See note 25, above.

79 See note 64, above.

80Toshio, Kishi, “Wani uji ni kansuru kisoteki kōsatsu,” in Kishi, Nihon kodai seiji kenkyū, 16–89.Google Scholar

81 Chin T'ang shu, Po-na pen ed., ch. 10,9a, 14a; Hsin T'ang shu, Po-na pen ed., ch. 220, l 1 b.

82Seiji, Okada, “Keitai Tennō no shutsuji to sono haikci: Ōmi daiōke no sciritsu o megutte,” Nihonshi kenkyū 128 (1972) 1–24.Google Scholar

83sholki, Nihon, maki 17, Keitai prcacccssion, Kokushi taikei ed., II, 11–12;Google Scholar Aston, tr., Nihongi, II, 1–2; Kojiki, maki 3, Burctsu; Kokushi Taikei ed., 144–145; Philippi, tr., Kojiki, 383.

84 See note 46, above.

85 See Mizuno Yū, Nihon kodai ōchō shiron josetsu, 23–43.

86 Yoshii Iwao, Tenno nō keifu to shinwa, 428–429.

87 See note 11, above.

88Mitsusada, Inoue, “Kodai kokka keisei no shondankai,” in Inoue, Nihon kodai kokka no kenkyū, 527–638, 586–587.Google Scholar

89Mitsusada, Inoue, “Kodai kokka keisei no shodankai,” Nihon kodai kokka no kenkyū, 591–599;Google ScholarMasaaki, Ueda, “Kodai kokka no seiji kōzō,” in Ueda, Nihon kodai kokka seiritsu shi no kenkyū(Tokyo, 1959), 119–219.Google Scholar

90 See note 88, above.

9l See note 83, above.

92 See note 82, above.

93 See note 60, above.

94 See note 60, above.

95 See note 60, above.

96 “Oi” probably means “nephew” here, and may have been fabricated by analogy to “ōhodo,” which might mean “uncle.”

97 Mizuno Yū, Zōtei Nihon kodai ōchō shiron josetsu, 72.

98 See note 80, above.

99Teikichi, Kida, “Keitai Tennō ika san tennō kōi keishō ni kansuru gimon, ” Rekishi chiri LII.i (1928) 1–29;Google ScholarTatsusaburō, Hayashiya, “Keitai Kimmei chō no nairan no shiteki bunseki,” in Hayashiya, Kodai kokka no keitai (Tokyo, 1954), 3–32;Google ScholarHayashiya, , “Futatabi Keitai Kimmei no nairan ni tsuite,” Kodai kokk no kaitai, 33–39;Google ScholarKōjirō, Naoki, “Keitai chō nairan to Jimmu densetsu,” in Naoki, Nihon kodai kokka no kōzō, 249–268;Google ScholarSeita, Toma, “Iwayuru Keitai Kimmei no nairan no seijiteki kiban: Kodai gōzoku ron no hitokoma, ” Rekishigaku kenkyū 239 (1960) 1–12;Google ScholarHiroshi, Shōji, “Keitai Kimmei nairan ikkō: Tokuni nairanno shutai seiryoku 0 chūshin ni,” Nihon jokpshi kenkyū IV.5 (1960) 86–88.Google Scholar

100 See note 3, above.

101Akira, Seki, Kikajin (Tokyo, 1956).Google Scholar

102 See note 99, above.

103Kōjirō, Naoki, Nihon kodai heisei shi no kenkyū(Tokyo, 1968)Google Scholar

104See Dairoku, Harada, Shinkō Iwai no hanran (Tokyo, 1973).Google Scholar

105 See note 103, above.

l06 See note 1 1 , above.

107Jun'ichi, Shida, Kodai shizoku no seikaku to denshō (Tokyo, 1971), 69–93.Google Scholar

108 See note 107, above.

109 See note 60, above.

110Nicholas, Ralph, “Segmentary Factional Political Systems, ” in Marc J. Swartz et al., eds., Political Anthropology (Aldine, 1966), 49–59.Google Scholar

111SeeMitsudada, Inoue, “Kodai no kōtaishi,” in Nihon kodai kokka no kenkyū, 179–222;Google ScholarKimiko, Ide, “Ōe sci no shiteki kōsatsu: Kimmei-Suikō cho no seiji katei ni furete,” Nihonshi kenkyū 109 (1970) 31–51.Google Scholar

l12 See note 35, above.

113 Mizuno Yū, Zōtei Nihon kodai ōchō shiron josetsnu, 122.

114Kōjirō, Naoki, “Seijishijonō Suikō chō, ” in Naoki, Nihon kodai kokka no kōzō (Tokyo, 1958), 269–283.Google Scholar

115shoki, Nihon, maki 20, Bidatsu 15, 2, 1; Kokushi taikei ed., II, 148; Aston, tr., Nihongi,II, 107; see Kishi Toshio, “Kōmyō rikkō no shiteki igi” and other works cited in note 33, above.Google Scholar

116shoki, Nihon, makj 22, Suiko 15, 2, 1; Kokushi taikei ed., II, 195–196; Aston, tr., Nihongi,II, 178.Google Scholar

117 See note 114, above.