Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T10:39:41.465Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rethinking Religious Divides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 June 2014

Richard M. Eaton
Get access

Extract

Notwithstanding the considerable body of scholarship on South Asian history that has appeared over the past several decades, we still live with the image of a monolithic and alien Islam colliding with an equally monolithic Hinduism, construed as indigenous, and from the eleventh century on, politically suppressed. Such a cardboard-cutout caricature survives in much of India's tabloid media, as well as in textbooks informed by a revivalist, aggressively political strand of Hinduism, or “Hindutva.” Though useful for stoking primordial identities or mobilizing support for political agendas, this caricature thrives on a pervasive ignorance of South Asia's past. Removing such ignorance is precisely the endeavor to which academic institutions, and scholarship more generally, are properly committed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 73 , Issue 2 , May 2014 , pp. 305 - 308
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Larson, Gerald James, “Partition: The ‘Pulsing Heart that Grieved,’” Journal of Asian Studies 73, no. 1 (2014): 5–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Asif, Manan Ahmed, “Idols in the Archive,” Journal of Asian Studies 73, no. 1 (2014): 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Larson, “Partition,” op. cit. note 1, 5, 7.

3 Ibid., 6.

4 Larson, Gerald James, India's Agony Over Religion (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995).Google Scholar

5 Ibid., 53, 103.

6 Huntington, Samuel P., “The Clash of Civilizations?” Foreign Affairs 72, no. 3 (1993): 22–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 Larson, India's Agony, op. cit. note 1, 6.

8 See Dirlik, Arif, “The Postcolonial Aura: Third World Criticism in the Age of Global Capitalism,” Critical Inquiry 20, no. 2 (1994): 348–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar; During, Simon, “Postmodernism or Postcolonialism?” Landfall 39 (1985): 366–80Google Scholar; Ahmad, Aijaz, In Theory: Classes, Nations, Literatures (London: Verso, 1992), 95–105Google Scholar, and chap. 8; McClintock, Anne, “The Angel of Progress: Pitfalls of the Term ‘Post-Colonialism,’” Social Text 31/32 (1992): 84–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9 For examples, see the articles in Gilmartin, David and Lawrence, Bruce B., eds., Beyond Turk and Hindu: Rethinking Religious Identities in Islamicate South Asia (Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 2000)Google Scholar. See also Roy, Asim, The Islamic Syncretistic Tradition in Bengal (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983)Google Scholar; Talbot, Cynthia, “Inscribing the Other, Inscribing the Self: Hindu-Muslim Identities in Pre-Colonial India,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 37, no. 4 (1995): 692–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Stewart, Tony K., “In Search of Equivalence: Conceiving Muslim-Hindu Encounter through Translation Theory,” History of Religions 40, no. 3 (2001): 260–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Thapar, Romila, Somanatha: The Many Voices of a History (New York: Verso, 2005)Google Scholar; Flood, Finbarr B., Objects of Translation: Material Culture and Medieval “Hindu-Muslim” Encounter (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009)Google Scholar; Busch, Allison, Poetry of Kings: The Classical Hindi Literature of Mughal India (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; O'Hanlon, Rosalind and Washbrook, David, Religious Cultures of Early Modern India: New Perspectives (New Delhi: Routledge, 2011)Google Scholar; Behl, Aditya, Love's Subtle Magic: An Indian Islamic Literary Tradition, 1379–1545 (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10 Behl, op cit. note 9.