Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T08:31:49.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reconstituting the Confucian Tradition*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

Tu Wei-ming
Tu Wei-ming
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Articles
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 33 , Issue 3 , May 1974 , pp. 441 - 454
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Chan, Wing-tsit, A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy (Princeton, 1963), p. 588.Google Scholar

2 Bruce, J. P., trans., The Philosophy of Human Nature by Chu Hsi (London, 1922).Google Scholar

3 Bruce, J. P., Chu Hsi and His Masters (London, 1923).Google Scholar Charles O. Hucker notes that it is “a standard reference on the development of Neo-Confucianism in Sung times and its culmination in the synthesis of Chu Hsi.” See his China: A Critical Bibliography (The University of Arizona Press, 1962).Google Scholar To my knowledge, the only other substantial monographic study on Chu Hsi in English is Conrad M. Schirokauer's unpublished dissertation on the political thought and behavior of Chu Hsi (Stanford University, i960). See Schirokauer's, Mr. “Chu Hsi's Political Career,” in Confucian Personalities, edited by Arthur Wright and Denis Twitchett (Stanford, 1962), pp. 162–188.Google Scholar

4 Fan Shou-k'ang, Chu Tzu ch'i ch'i che-hsüeh (Chu Hsi and His Philosophy) (Taipei, 1964). T‘ang Chün-i, Chung-kuo che-hsiieh yuan-lundk 2 Vols (An Original Exposition of Chinese Philosophy) (Hong Kong, 1965–68). Mou Tsung-san, Hsin-t'iyii hsing-t'id1 3 Vols (Mind and Human Nature) (Taipei, 1968).

5 Ch‘ien Mu, Yang-ming hsüeh shu-yaod1 (A Summary of Yang-ming's Learning; reprint; Taipei, 1954).

6 Bary, Wm. T. de, comp., Sources of Chinese Tradition (New York, 1960), pp. 585–586.Google Scholar

7 Liu, James T. C., “;How Did a Neo-Confucian PPSchool Become the State Orthodoxy?” in Philosophy East and West XXIII, No. 4 (October 1973). PP 483–505.Google Scholar

8 Ying-shih, Yü, “Ts'ung Sung-Ming jn-hsüeh ti ja-chan lun Ch'ing-tai ssu-hsiang shihim” (“Ch'ing Thought as Seen Through the Development of Sung-Ming Confucianism,”) in Chung-kuo hsüehjendn (chinese Scholar) 2 (September 1970), pp.19–41. This is the first part of a two-part article. The subtitle is “Sung-Ming ju-hsüeh chung chihshih chu-i ti ch'uan-t'ungdo” (“The Tradition of Intellectualism in Sung-Ming Confucianism.”)Google Scholar

9 Wang Mou-hung, Chu Tzu nien-p'u k'ao-idp (A Critical Examination of Chu Hsi's Chronological Biography) (Ts'ung-shu cfi-ch'engddq edition, 1937), pp. 263–268.

10 Wing-tsit Chan, p. 589.