Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:32:37.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Proprietary Mutations and the Mutiny in Rohilkhand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

E. I. Brodkin
Get access

Extract

Rohilkhand, at the time of the Mutiny of 1857, was a division of the North-Western Provinces comprising the districts of Bijnor, Moradabad, Budaun, Bareilly, and Shahjahanpur. It was here and in neighboring Oudh that the uprising achieved its greatest intensity. Hitherto, it has been assumed that the proprietary mutations which occurred in Rohilkhand after its cession in 1801 by the Nawab of Oudh to the East India Company are highly significant as a cause of the uprising. G. J. Christian, the Secretary to the Sudder Board of Revenue of the North-Western Provinces, reported in 1854 that “in no other country in the world probably do landed tenures so certainly, constantly, and extensively change hands. These mutations are effecting a rapid and complete revolution in the position of the ancient proprietors of the soil.” William Edwards, the Collector of Budaun at the time of the Mutiny, wrote:

To the large number of these sales during the past twelve or fifteen years, and the operation of our revenue system, which has had the result of destroying the gentry of the country … I attribute solely the disorganization of this and the neighbouring districts in these provinces. By fraud or chicanery, a vast number of the estates of families of rank and influence have been alienated, either wholly or in part, and have been purchased by new men … without character or influence over their tenantry. … I am fully satisfied that the rural classes would never have joined in rebelling with die sepoys … had not these causes of discontent already existed.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , August 1969 , pp. 667 - 683
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Report by the Sudder Board of Revenue on the Revenue Administration of the North Western Provinces: 1852–53, (Agra: 1854), p. 5.Google Scholar

2 Personal Adventures during the Indian Rebellion in Rohilcund, Futtehghur, and Oude (London: Smith, Elder & Co., 1858), pp. 12–13, 17.Google Scholar

3 Civil Rebellion in the Indian Mutinies: 1857–1859 (Calcutta: World Press, 1957), pp. 11, 21.Google Scholar

4 The Aftermath of Revolt (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1964), p. 83.Google Scholar

5 Ibid., p. 60. Also pp. 63–64, 65, 68.

6 Selection of Papers on Agricultural Indebtedness and the Restriction of the Power to Alienate Interests in Land, (Simla: 1898), I, 276–77.Google Scholar

7 Report by the Sudder Board of Revenue on the Revenue Administration of the North Western Provinces: 1848–49, (Agra, 1851), pp. 10, 14, 39, 42Google Scholar. Ibid., 1849–50, (Agra: 1851), pp. 16, 20, 45, 48. Ibid., 1850–51, (Agra: 1852), pp. 16, 20, 45, 49. Ibid., 1851–52, (Agra: 1853), pp. 20, 24, 50, 53. Ibid., 1852–53, (Agra: 1854), pp. 16, 20, 46, 49. Ibid., 1853–54, (Agra: 1855), pp. 10, 14, 42, 46.

8 Report on the Settlement of the Bareilly District: North-Western Provinces, (Allahabad 1874), p. 134.Google Scholar

9 Final Report on the Settlement of the Moradabad District, (Allahabad 1881), p. 75.Google Scholar

10 Table I and Report on the Census of the North West Provinces of the Bengal Presidency, (Calcutta 1854), pp. 152, 164, 176, 186, 208.Google Scholar

11 Report on the Tenth Settlement of the District of Bijnour: North-Western Provinces, (Allahabad 1874), p. 96.Google Scholar

12 Ibid., p. 93.

13 Report on the Settlement of the Shahjehanpore District, (Allahabad: 1874), p. xxxiv.Google Scholar

14 Bareilly Settlement Report, p. 55.

15 Ibid., pp. 80–81 and Moradabad Settlement Report, pp. 63–64.

16 Moradabad Settlement Report, p. 64.

17 Bareilly Settlement Report, p. 80.

18 Extracts from the “usurer's book” covering the period 1857–1868 appear in a letter from the Commissioner of Allahabad to the Secretary to the Government of the North Western Provinces, September 28, 1872. Commissioner's Office Rohilkhand, Dept. IVA, File 97A, State Archives of Uttar Pradesh, Allahabad.

19 Ibid.

20 Bareilly Settlement Report, p. 81.

21 Ibid., p. 55.

22 Moradabad Settlement Report, p. 67.

23 Resolution of the Department of Revenue, No. 259 of 1883, Allahabad, January 29, 1883, p. 5.

24 Notes on Indian Affairs (London: John W. Parker, 1837), I, 171.Google Scholar

25 See, for example, Henley Clarke, Collector, “Report on the Revenue Administration of Zillah Bareilly,” 1842–43, July 14, 1843, Selections from the Records of Government: North Western Provinces, (Allahabad: 1868), IV, 277–78.Google Scholar

26 Shore, Notes, I, 207.

27 Report by the Sudder Board of Revenue on the Revenue Administration of the North Western Provinces: 1848–49, (Agra: 1851), p. 8Google Scholar. Ibid., 1849–50, (Agra: 1851), p. 14. Ibid., 1850–51, (Agra: 1852), p. 14. Ibid., 1851–52, (Agra: 1853), p. 18. Ibid., 1852–53, (Agra: 1854), p. 14. Ibid., 1853–54, (Agra: 1855), p. 8. Ibid., 1854–55, (Agra: 1856), p. 10. Ibid., 1855–56, (Agra: 1856), p. 10.

28 Board of Commissioners to General Sir G. Nugent, September 20, 1814, Board of Commissioners Proceedings, September 20, 1814.

29 Ibid.

30 Board of Customs to the Governor-General, March 21, 1815, Selections from the Revenue Records of the North-West Provinces: 1818–1820 (Calcutta: 1866), p. 358.Google Scholar

31 W. H. Trant to Francis Law, June 3, 1818, Board of Commissioners Proceedings, August 10, 1818.

32 W. H. Trant to Francis Law, July 24, 1818, Board of Commissioners Proceedings, August 10, 1818.

33 This example of the early excesses was related to the Commissioner of Rohilkhand by an official involved in the settlements of Bareilly and Moradabad under Regulation IX of 1833. See Reports on the Revenue Settlements of the North Western Provinces of the Bengal Presidency under Regulation IX, 1833 (Banaras: 1862), I, 466.Google Scholar

34 Thomason's Despatches (Calcutta: 1856), I, 407.Google Scholar

35 Money, R. to Conolly, W. J., November 15, 1842, Reports on the Revenue Settlements of the North Western Provinces of the Bengal Presidency under Regulation IX, 1833, I, 403–04.Google Scholar

36 S. S. Brown, “Report on the Settlement of the District of. Budaon,” May 7, 1835, ibid., I, 477.

37 Statistical Report of the District of Budaon, (Agra: 1855), p. 8.Google Scholar

38 Ibid.

39 Muir, James to Turner, T. J., June 1, 1837, Reports on the Revenue Settlements of the North Western Provinces of the Bengal Presidency under Regulation IX, 1833, I, 558–59.Google Scholar

40 Bird, R. M., “Report on the Settlement of the North-Western Provinces,” January 21, 1842, Revenue Survey of India, East India House, 1853, pp. 135–36.Google Scholar

41 James Muir to Commissioner of Bareilly, September 5, 1838, Reports on the Revenue Settlements of the North Western Provinces of the Bengal Presidency under Regulation IX, I833, II, 6–7.

42 See Statement of demands, collections and balances for the year 1853–54. Report by the Sudder Board of Revenue on the Revenue Administration of the North Western Provinces: 1853–54, p. 6.

43 This is actually the total of the years 1851–52 to 1855–56. The records for the year 1856–57 were destroyed during the Mutiny. Ibid., 1851–52, p. 16. Ibid., 1852–53, p. 12. Ibid., 1853–54, p. 6. Ibid., 1854–55, p. 8. Ibid., 1855–56, p. 8.

44 Ibid.

45 Shahjahanpur Settlement Report, p. xl.

46 Selections from the Records of Government: North Western Provinces, (Agra: 1856), IV, 212.Google Scholar

47 C. J. Wingfield to R. Alexander, March 10, 1855, Ibid., pp. 210, 212.

48 R. H. S. Campbell to R. Alexander, July 24, 1855, Ibid., p. 214.

49 F. Williams to R. Alexander, March 21, 1855, Ibid., p. 215.

50 M. Ricketts to R. Alexander, February 1, 1855, Ibid., p. 217.

51 H. W. Hammond to W. Muir, Agra, September 7, 1855, Report by the Sudder Board of Revenue on the Revenue Administration of the North Western Provinces: 1853–54, p. 4.

52 Bareilly Settlement Report, p. 81.

53 F. Williams to R. Alexander, March 21, 1855, “Frequency of Transfer of Proprietary Title,” p. 215.

54 Selection of Papers on Agricultural Indebtedness and the Restriction of the Power to Alienate Interests in Land, (Simla: 1898), I, 450.

55 H. W. Hammond to W. Muir, September 7, 1855, “Frequency of Transfer of Proprietry Title,” p. 185.

56 Quoted in Moradabad Settlement Report, p. 76.

57 Ibid.

58 Quoted by Colvin in Selections from the Records of Government: North-Western Provinces, (Allahabad: 1871), IV, 296.Google Scholar

59 J. Strachey to R. Alexander, July 16, 1855, “Frequency of Transfer of Proprietary Title,” pp. 213–14.

60 See Memorandum on the Restriction of the Power to Alienate Interests in Land, (Calcutta: 1895), pp. 14–15.Google Scholar

61 M. Finucane, Officiating Secretary to the Board of Revenue, L. P., Selection of Papers on Agricultural Indebtedness and the Restriction of the Power to Alienate Interests in Land, I, 286.

62 William Tennant, Indian Recreations (London: Longman, Hurst, Rees, and Orme, 1804), II, 381.

63 Statistical Report on the District of Budaon, p. 3.

64 Bareilly Settlement Report, p. 138.

65 See, for example, A. Seton to G. Mercer, February 28, 1803, Board of Commissioners Proceedings, April 12, 1803. Also Seton to Mercer, March 3, 1803, Board of Commissioners Proceedings, April 12, 1803.

66 C. Lloyd to Board of Commissioners, May 23, 1808, Board of Commissioners Proceedings, July 5, 1808.

67 Report of April 13, 1808. Cited by Holt Mackenzie, July 1, 1819, Bengal Revenue Consultations, September 16, 1820.

68 J. Thornton to W. Muir, February 17, 1848, Thomason's Despatches, p. 373.

69 See A. Seton to G. Mercer, February 28, 1803, Board of Commissioners Proceedings, April 12, 1803, and Seton to Mercer, March 3, 1803, ibid.

70 See Board of Commissioners to Lord Minto, December 3, 1807, Board of Commissioners Proceedings, December 17, 1807. W. I. Sands to Board of Commissioners, February 1, 1808, Board of Commissioners Proceedings, February 3, 1808. C. Dumbleton to Board of Commissioners, April 11, 1808, Selections from Revenue Records: “North-West Provinces (Allahabad: 1873), p. 393Google Scholar. F. Law to W. H. Trant, April 30, 1818, Board of Commissioners Proceedings, August 10, 1818, and Trant to Lowther, May 9, 1818, ibid.

71 J. Thornton to W. Muir, February 17, 1848, Thomason's Despatches, pp. 372–73.

72 Supra, n. 1.

73 Bijnor Settlement Report, p. 94.

74 Shahjahanpur Settlement Report, pp. xxxv-xxxvii.

75 Memoir on the Statistics of the North Western Provinces of the Bengal Presidency, (Calcutta: 1848), p. 5.Google Scholar

76 Ibid., p. 15.

77 Bijnor Settlement Report, p. 93.

78 Ibid.

79 Shahjahanpur Settlement Report, p. xxxvii.

80 See, for example, Narrative of Events Attending the Outbreak of Disturbances and the Restoration of Authority in the District of Shahjehanpoor in 1857–58, (Shahjahanpur: 1858), p. 451Google Scholar, and Report by the Sudder Board of Revenue on the Revenue Administration of the North Western Provinces: 1857–58, (Allahabad: 1859), p. 8.Google Scholar

81 Narrative of the Outbreak, of Disturbances and Restoration of Authority at Bareilly during the Year 1857–58, (Bareilly: 1858), p. 367.Google Scholar

82 See, for example, Edwards, Personal Adventures, p. 6.

83 Bijnor Settlement Report, pp. 269–73, and Shahjahanpur Settlement Report, p. 65.

84 Narrative of Events Attending the Outbreak of Disturbances and Restoration of Authority in the Rohlkhund [sic] Division in 1857–58, (Bareilly: 1858), p. 10.Google Scholar

85 W. Muir to R. Alexander, April 28, 1858. Commissioner's Office Rohilkhand, Dept. XXIV, File 1/46, State Archives of Uttar Pradesh, Allahabad.

86 Khan Bahadur Khan to the Nawab of Rampur, Yusaf Ali Khan, December 4, 1857, Rampur Mutiny Records, Bundle No. 5, File No. 172, Serial No. 4, State Archives of Uttar Pradesh, Allahabad. The dates of these Persian language records have been converted according to Comparative Tables of Muhammadan and Christian Dates (London: Luzac & Co., 1932).Google Scholar

87 W. Muir to R. Alexander, July 7, 1858, Commissioner's Office Rohilkhand, Dept. XXIV, File 1/46, State Archives of Uttar Pradesh, Allahabad.

88 R. Alexander to the Nawab of Rampur, May 9, 1858, Rampur Mutiny Records, Bundle No. 2, File No. 114, Serial No. 2.

89 R. Alexander to J. Inglis, November 8, 1858, Board of Revenue, Bareilly, File 14, Accession No. 528, State Archives of Uttar Pradesh, Allahabad.

90 Alexander, Rohilkhand Narrative, p. 12.

91 W. Muir to General Havelock, August 20, 1857, Records of the Intelligence Department of the Government of the North-West Provinces of India during the Mutiny of 1857, ed. Coldstream, W. (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1902), II, 134.Google Scholar

92 Inglis, Bareilly Narrative, p. 377.

93 Narrative of Events Attending the Outbreak, of Disturbances at Budaon, (Budaun: 1858), pp. 462–63.Google Scholar

94 Edwards, Personal Adventures, pp. 142, 146, and Money, Shahjahanpur Narrative, p. 445.

95 W. Muir to J. W. Sherer, September 12, 1857, Intelligence Records, I, 90.

96 Inglis, Bareilly Narrative, p. 378.

97 Copies of Daily Bulletins issued by E. A. Reade, March-July, 1858, April 18, 1858, State Archives of Uttar Pradesh, Allahabad.

98 W. Muir to J. W. Sherer, October 22, 1857, Intelligence Records, I, 215.

99 Bijnor Settlement Report, p. 95, and Shahjahanpur Settlement Report, p. xxxv.

100 Shahjahanpur Settlement Report, p. xxxix.

101 Bijnor Settlement Report, p. 95. Brahmins were also important gainers.

102 Shahjahanpur Settlement Report, p. xx.

103 Memorandum on the Restriction of the Power to Alienate Interests in Land, p. 15.

104 Inglis, Bareilly Narrative, pp. 369, 371.

105 See Commissioner's Office Rohilkhand, Dept. I, File 48, State Archives of Uttar Pradesh, Allahabad.

106 Board of Revenue, Bareilly, File 14, Accession No. 528, November 8, 1860, State Archives of Uttar Pradesh, Allahabad.

107 Pensions of the Family of Hafiz Rehmut Khan, Commissioner's Office Rohilkhand, Dept. V, File 3/133, State Archives of Uttar Pradesh, Allahabad.

108 ibid.

109 Narrative of a Journey through the Upper Provinces of India from Calcutta to Bombay: 1824–1825 (London: John Murray, 1828. 2nd ed.), II, 119–20Google Scholar. Heber's most important source of information was Boulderson, probably the ablest of the pre-Mutiny Collectors of Bareilly.

110 J. C. Wilson, Commissioner on Special Duty, to G. F. Edmonstone, July 27, 1858, Board of Revenue, Moradabad, File 22, Accession No. 548, State Archives of Uttar Pradesh, Allahabad.

111 Shore, Notes, II, 433.

112 The proposal was reported in a letter from the Magistrate of Bareilly to the Commissioner of Rohilkhand. February 18, 1869. Commissioner's Office Rohilkhand, Dept. XX, File 5, State Archives of Uttar Pradesh, Allahabad.

113 Quoted in University Education in England for Natives of India (London: James Ridgway, 1860), Appendix.Google Scholar