Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T14:45:28.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Marriage in Taiwan, 1881–1905 An Example of Regional Diversity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2010

Chuang Ying-Chang  and
Arthur P. Wolf
Get access

Extract

Sinologists have long agreed that many aspects of Chinese culture vary widely from region to region and even from valley to valley and town to town. The question for contemporary scholars is why and with what consequences. The problem we face is that while evidence from widely scattered communities is adequate to demonstrate the fact of regional diversity, it is not adequate to test hypotheses concerning its causes and consequences. What we need are detailed maps of the distribution and frequency of such practices as male adoption, uxorilocal marriage, cash bride-price, double burial, and foot binding. The only chance we have of discovering why Chinese culture varies is to see how that variation relates to the location of such likely causes as relations with non-Han peoples, the strength of state control, and the balance of forces in local modes of production.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 54 , Issue 3 , August 1995 , pp. 781 - 795
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Barclay, George W. 1954. Colonial Development and Population in Taiwan. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chuang, Ying-Chang. 1987. “Ch'ing Dynasty Chinese Immigration to Taiwan: An Anthropological Perspective.” Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnology 64:179–203.Google Scholar
Chuang, Ying-Chang. 1991. “Chinese T'ung-yang-hsi Marriage: The Ch'en Family of T'ou-fen, Taiwan.” Proceedings of the National Science Council, Part C 1.2:174–84.Google Scholar
Davidson, James W. 1903. The Island of Formosa: Historical View from 1430 to 1900. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Freedman, Maurice. 1957. Chinese Family and Marriage in Singapore. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Gates, Hill. 1989. “The Commoditization of Chinese Women.” Signs 14:799–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gates, Hill. In Press. China's Motor: A Thousand Years of Petty Capitalism. Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, Youngsook Kim. 1983. “Minmyonuri: The Daughter-in-law Who Comes of Age in Her Mother-in-law's House.” In Kendall, Laurel and Peterson, Mark, eds., Korean Women: View from the Inner Room, pp. 45–61. New Haven: East Rock Press.Google Scholar
Ho, Samuel P. S. 1978. Economic Development of Taiwan, 1860–1970. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Levy, Marion J. Jr. 1949. The Family Revolution in Modern China. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Man-Hung. 1978. Ch'a, Tang, Chang-nao yu Wan Ch'ing T'ai-wan Ching-chi She-hui chih Pien-ch'ien (Tea, Sugar, Camphor, and Socioeconomic change in Late Ch'ing Taiwan). T'ai-wan Yen-chiu Ts'ung-k'an, no. 115. Taipei, Taiwan: T'aiwan Ying-hang Ching-chi Yen-chiu Shih.Google Scholar
Li, Hsing-Hua. 1941. “Long-lu Oboegaki” (A Memorandum on “Adopted Daughters”). Minzoku Taiwan 3.11:32–33.Google Scholar
Okada, Yuruzu. 1949. Kiso Shakai (Elementary Groups of Society). Tokyo: Kobundo.Google Scholar
Pasternak, Burton. 1972. Kinship and Community in Two Chinese Villages. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Pasternak, Burton. 1983. Guests in the Dragon: Social Demography of a Chinese District, 1895–1946. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Pasternak, Burton. 1985. “On the Causes and Demographic Consequences of Uxorilocal Marriage in China.” In Hanley, Susan B. and Wolf, Arthur P., eds., Family and Population in East Asian History, pp. 309–34. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Shepherd, John R. 1993. Statecraft and Political Economy on the Taiwan Frontier, 1600–1800. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Shepherd, John R. 1991. Draft. “Marriage Mode and Marriage Market: Spatial, Temporal, and Class Variation in Taiwan.”Google Scholar
Sa, Sophie. 1985. “Marriage Among the Taiwanese of Pre-1945 Taipei.” In Hanley, Susan B. and Wolf, Arthur P., eds., Family and Population in East Asian History, pp. 277–308. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, G. William. 1964. “Marketing and Social Structure in Rural China, Part I.” The Journal of Asian Studies 24.1:3–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, G. William. 1985. “The Structure of Chinese Society,” The Journal of Asian Studies, 44.2:271–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsang, Cheng-Hwa. 1992 Archaeology of the P'eng-hu Islands. Taipei, Taiwan: Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Wang, Shih-Ch'ing. 1994. Ch'ing-tai T'ai-wan She-hui Ching-chi (Society and economy in Ch'ing Dynasty Taiwan). Taipei, Taiwan: Lien-ching Ch'u-pan Shihyeh Kung-szu.Google Scholar
Wolf, Arthur P. 1968. “Adopt a Daughter-in-law, Marry a Sister: A Chinese Solution to the Problem of the Incest Taboo.” American Anthropologist 70.5: 864–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, Arthur P. 1974. “Marriage and Adoption in Northern Taiwan.” In Smith, Robert J., ed., Social Organization and the Applications of Anthropology. Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, Arthur P. and Huang, Chieh-Shan. 1980. Marriage and Adoption in China, 1845–1945. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, Arthur P. 1989. “The Origins and Explanation of Variation in the Chinese Kinship System.” In Chang, Kwang-chih, Li, Kuang-chou, Wolf, Arthur P., and Yin, Alexander Chien-chung, eds., Anthropological Studies of the Taiwan Area, pp. 241–60. Taipei, Taiwan: National Taiwan University.Google Scholar
Wolf, Arthur P. 1989. “Social Hierarchy and Cultural Diversity: A Critique of G. William Skinner's View of Chinese Peasant Culture.” Ti-erh-chiai Kuo-chi Hanhsueh-hui Yi-lun Wen-chi: Min-su yu Wen-hua Tsu (Proceedings of the second international conference on sinology: Folk custom and culture section, pp. 311–18. Taipei, Taiwan: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Wolf, Arthur P. 1995. Sexual Attraction and Childhood Association: A Chinese Brief for Edward Westermarck. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoon, Hyungsook. 1989. “Rethinking Traditional Marriage in Korea.” Korea Journal 29.12:17–27.Google Scholar