Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:33:39.274Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Living with Uncertainty after March 11, 2011

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2012

Jordan Sand
Get access

Extract

One year has passed since the earthquake and tsunami in Tōhoku. How should we as scholars approach, think about, and teach about the disaster? In generations hence, will 2011 be treated as a historical turning point on a par with 1945? Will it appear more significant than the Great Kantō Earthquake of 1923, despite the far greater loss of life in that event? We have a long process of analysis and contextualization ahead before the traumatic events of March 2011 have sedimented into history. Meanwhile, the nuclear disaster continues. When the Japanese government announced in December that complete decommissioning of the Fukushima Daiichi reactors would take forty years, it became clear that even in the most optimistic scenario the world would be living with this disaster for a long time to come.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 71 , Issue 2 , May 2012 , pp. 313 - 318
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Aoki, Mizuho. 2012. “Nuclear Awakening: Mothers First to Shed Food-Safety Complacency.” Japan Times, January 4.Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich. 2011a. “Kono kikai ni—Fukushima, aruiwa sekai risuku shakai ni okeru Nihon no mirai” [Taking This Opportunity: Fukushima and Japan's Future in the Global Risk Society] trans. Munenori, Suzuki. In Risukuka suru Nihon shakai: Ururihhi Bekku to no taiwa [Japanese Society as a Risk Society: Conversations with Ulrich Beck], ed. Beck, Ulrich, Munenori, Suzuki, and Midori, Itō, 1–12. Tokyo: Iwanami shoten.Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich. 2011b. “Ulrich Beck: System of Organized Irresponsibility behind the Fukushima Crisis.” Interview with Ulrich Beck by Hirohito Ohno. Asahi Shimbun English edition, July 7. http://ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/opinion/AJ201107063167 (accessed January 6, 2012).Google Scholar
Ramana, M. V. 2011. “Beyond Our Imagination: Fukushima and the Problem of Assessing Risk.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, web edition, April 19. http://thebulletin.org/web-edition/features/beyond-our-imagination-fukushima-and-the-problem-of-assessing-risk (accessed January 6, 2012).Google Scholar
Sekiya, Naoya. 2011. “Nihon no bōsai shisutemu no kansei” [The Completion of Japan's Disaster Prevention System] In Daishinsai go no shakaigaku [Sociology after the Great Tōhoku Earthquake], ed. Kaoru, Endō, 238–71. Tokyo: Kōdansha gendai shinsho.Google Scholar
Smits, Gregory. 2011. “Danger in the Lowground: Historical Context for the March 11, 2011 Tōhoku Earthquake and Tsunami.” The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus 9, May 6 [updated June 13]. http://www.japanfocus.org/-Gregory-Smits/3531 (accessed January 6, 2012).Google Scholar
Tanikawa, Miki. 2011. “Japan Gets Electricity Wake-Up Call.” New York Times, October 26.Google Scholar