Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T21:11:28.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Limits of the State: Coercion and Consent in Chinese Tibet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2013

Fernanda Pirie
Get access

Abstract

Although China's Tibetans profoundly mistrust the ideologies of the party-state, associating them with illegitimate practices of domination, protest and revolt are rare and effectively suppressed. This might be seen as quasi-colonial domination, the state securing subjection through the performance of paramount power, demonstrated by its suppression of the 2008 protests, or it could be attributed to a form of indirect rule, by which local officials engage with local leaders to generate hegemonic consent. While both dynamics are present on the Tibetan plateau, ethnographic fieldwork among the Tibetan populations of Qinghai and Gansu Provinces reveals that consent is primarily generated by local officials who negotiate a form of local order with religious and tribal leaders. Ignoring the ideological demands of their superiors, they engage constructively with the expectations of the Tibetans about how order should be maintained and, in doing so, subvert the state's ideal of uniform and unitary sovereignty.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 72 , Issue 1 , February 2013 , pp. 69 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Abrams, Philip. 1988. “Some Notes on the Difficulty of Studying the State.” Journal of Historical Sociology 1(1):58–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breivik, Irene. 2007. “The Political Ecology of Grassland Conservation in Qinghai.” Master's thesis, Norwegian University of Life Sciences.Google Scholar
Bulag, Uradyn. 2003. “Alternative Mongolian Identity: From Nationality to Ethnic Group.” In Chinese Society, eds. Perry, Elizabeth and Selden, Mark, 261–87. London: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar
Carrasco, Pedro. 1959. Land and Polity in Tibet. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, Graham. 1989. “Aspects of Social Organisation of Tibetan Pastoral Communities.” In Tibetan Studies, Proceedings of the 5th Seminar of the International Association for Tibetan Studies, eds. Ihara, Shōren and Yamaguchi, Zuihō, 393–409. Narita-shi, Chiba-Ken, Japan: Naritan Shinshoji.Google Scholar
Crehan, Kate. 2002. Gramsci, Culture and Anthropology. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
D'Ollone, Vicomte. 1912. In Forbidden China: The d'Ollone Mission 1906–1909. Translated by Miall, Bernard. London: T. Fisher Unwin.Google Scholar
Dresch, Paul. 1984. “The Position of Shayks among the Northern Tribes of Yemen.” Man 19(1): 31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekvall, Robert. 1939. Cultural Relations on the Kansu-Tibetan Border. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ekvall, Robert. 1964. “Peace and War among the Tibetan Nomads.” American Anthropologist 66(5):1119–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekvall, Robert. 1968. Fields on the Hoof. Prospect Heights, Ill.: Waveland.Google Scholar
Femia, Joseph. 1975. “Hegemony and Consciousness in the Thought of Antonio Gramsci.” Political Studies 23(1):29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Andrew. 2004. Urban Fault Lines in Shangri-La: Population and Economic Foundations of Inter-Ethnic Conflict in the Tibetan Areas of Western China. Working Paper no. 42, Crisis States Programme, London School of Economics and Political Science, London.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Melvyn. 1994. “Change, Conflict and Continuity among a Community of Nomadic Pastoralists.” In Resistance and Reform in Tibet, eds. Barnett, Robert and Akiner, Shirin, 76–111. London: Hurst & Co.Google Scholar
Goodman, David. 2004. “Qinghai and the Emergence of the West: Nationalities, Communal Interactions and National Integration.” China Quarterly 178:379–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gramsci, Antonio. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. Edited and translated by Hoare, Quintin and Nowell Smith, Geoffrey. New York: International.Google Scholar
Guha, Ranajit. 1999. Dominance without Hegemony: History and Power in Colonial India. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, Thomas, and Stepputat, Fin, eds. 2005. Sovereign Bodies: Citizens, Migrants, and State in the Postcolonial World. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrell, Stephen. 2001. “The Anthropology of Reform and the Reform of Anthropology: Anthropological Narratives of Recovery and Progress in China.” Annual Review of Anthropology 30:139–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hermanns, Matthias. 1949. Die nomaden von Tibet [The nomads of Tibet]. Wien: Verlag Herold.Google Scholar
Hillman, Ben. 2005. “Monastic Politics and the Local State in China.” China Journal 54:29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horlemann, Bianca. 2002. “Modernization Efforts in Mgo Log.” In Amdo Tibetans in Transition, ed. Huber, Toni, 241–69. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Khoury, Philip, and Kostiner, Joseph, eds. 1990. Tribes and State Formation in the Middle East. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kozloff, P.K. 1908. “Through Eastern Tibet and Kam.” Geographical Journal 31(4):402–15; 31(5):522–34; 31(6):649–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, Nancy. 1999. “Cattle and Cash Economy: Responses to Change among Tibetan Nomadic Pastoralists in Sichuan, China.” Human Organisation 58(2):161–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberthal, Kenneth. 2004. Governing China: From Revolution through Reform. New York: Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Mingxing, Liu and Ran, Tao. 2007. “Local Governance and Fiscal Reform.” In Paying for Progress in China, eds. Shue, Vivienne and Wong, Christine, 166–89. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Makley, Charlene. 2005. “‘Speaking Bitterness’: Autobiography, History and Mnemonic Politics on the Sino-Tibetan Frontier.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 47(1):40–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makley, Charlene. 2007. The Violence of Liberation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Makley, Charlene. 2008. “The Politics of Memory: Gender, Autobiography and Maoist Violence in Amdo.” In Conflict and Social Order in Tibet and Inner Asia, eds. Pirie, Fernanda and Huber, Toni, 113–33. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Donald. 1998. “Subaltern Struggles and the Politics of Place: Remapping Resistance in Zimbabwe's Eastern Highlands.” Cultural Anthropology 13(3):344–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norbu, Namkhai. 1997. Journey among the Tibetan Nomads: An Account of a Remote Civilisation. Dharamsala: Library of Tibetan Works and Archives.Google Scholar
Perry, Elizabeth, and Selden, Mark, eds. 2000. Chinese Society: Change, Conflict and Resistance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pieke, Frank. 2004. “Contours of an Anthropology of the Chinese State: Political Structure, Agency and Economic Development in Rural China.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 10(3):517–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirie, Fernanda. 2005a. “Segmentation within the State: The Reconfiguration of Tibetan Tribes in China's Reform Period.” Nomadic Peoples 9(1):83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirie, Fernanda. 2005b. “Tribe and State in Eastern Tibet: Feuding, Mediation and the Negotiation of Authority among the Amdo Nomads.” Working paper no. 72. Halle: Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology.Google Scholar
Pirie, Fernanda. 2008. “Violence and Opposition among the Nomads of Amdo: Expectations of Leadership and Religious Authority.” In Conflict and Social Order in Tibet and Inner Asia, eds. Pirie, Fernanda and Huber, Toni, 217–40. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirie, Fernanda. 2012. “Legal Dramas on the Amdo Grasslands: Abolition, Transformation or Survival?” In Revisiting Rituals in a Changing Tibetan World, ed. Buffetrille, Katia, 83–107. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, Pitman. 2003. “Belief in Control: Regulation of Religion in China.” China Quarterly 174:317–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, Pitman. 2005. “Governance of China's Periphery: Balancing Local Autonomy and National Unity.” Columbia Journal of Asian Law 19(1):293–322.Google Scholar
Rock, J.F. 1956. The Amnye Machen Range and Adjacent Regions: A Monographic Study. Rome: Is.M.E.O.Google Scholar
Rossabi, Morris, ed. 2004. Governing China's Multiethnic Frontiers. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Saich, Tony. 2001. Governance and Politics of China. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, James. 1985. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Shih, Victor. 2004. “Development the Second Time Around.” Journal of East Asian Studies 4(3):427–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shue, Vivienne. 2004. “Legitimacy Crisis in China?” In State and Society in 21st-Century China, eds. Hays Gries, Peter and Rosen, Stanley, 24–49. New York: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar
Wong, Christine. 2007. “Ethnic Minority Regions and Fiscal Decentralization in China: The Promises and Reality of Asymmetric Treatment.” In Fiscal Fragmentation in Decentralized Countries, eds. Bird, Richard and Ebel, Robert, 267–92. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Wylie, T.V. 1959. “A Standard System of Tibetan Transcription.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 22:261–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dali, Yang. 2004. Remaking the Chinese Leviathan. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Yeh, Emily. 2003. “Tibetan Range Wars: Spatial Politics and Authority on the Grasslands of Amdo.” Development and Change 34(3):499–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar