Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:44:40.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction: Some Recent Approaches to Japanese Nationalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

Kenneth B. Pyle
Get access

Extract

The study of nationalism, the most powerful political emotion in the modern world, has often become enmeshed in polemic and ideological combat. In Japan during the past century, evaluations of the historical role of nationalism have tended to oscillate between extremes. Some of its first serious students in the late nineteenth century, writers like Kuga Katsunan and Miyake Setsurei, opposing the prevalent Westernism, were convinced that nationalism was a necessary ingredient of Japanese survival; and they would have agreed with Tocqueville's aphorism that “the interests of the human race are better served by giving every man a particular fatherland than by trying to inflame his passions for the whole of humanity.” Since 1945, however, in a mood of national self-alienation, many Japanese writers have shared Veblen's turgid conclusion, “Born in iniquity and conceived in sin, the spirit of nationalism has never ceased to lead human institutions to the service of dissension and distress. In its material effects it is altogether the most sinister as well as the most imbecile of all the institutional incumbrances that have come down out of the old order.” Once seen as necessary and beneficial, nationalism came in the post-war period to be villified or simply ignored amidst the scholars' preoccupation with their anti-establishment liberal heroes. With some notable exceptions, nationalism has been slow to receive in Japan the thoughtful, dispassionate study it needs.

Type
A Symposium on Japanese Nationalism
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , November 1971 , pp. 5 - 16
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Quoted in Schlesinger, Arthur M. Jr., “Nationalism and History,” Journal of Negro History, LIV, i (1969), 19–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Ibid.

3 Brown, Delmer M., Nationalism in Japan: An Introductory Historical Analysis (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1955)Google Scholar.

4 Wilson, George M., Radical Nationalist in Japan: Kita lkki, 1883–1937 (Cambridge, Mass., 1969), ICrossRefGoogle Scholar. Let me stress that many of the books and articles I have used as examples actually employ several methodological approaches. Professor Wilson's book, for example, in addition to treating the composition of Kita's ideas is also concerned with Kita's political environment and the interplay of the two.

5 Minear, Richard H., Japanese Tradition and Western Law: Emperor, State, and Law in the Thought of Hozumi Yatsuka (Cambridge, Mass., 1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Kohn, Hans, The Idea of Nationalism (New York, 1944) p. 10Google Scholar.

7 Minear, p. 188.

8 Deutsch, Karl W., Nationalism and Social Com with munication (Cambridge, Mass., 1966), p. 16Google Scholar.

9 Johnson, Chalmers A., Peasant Nationalism and Communist Power (Stanford, 1962), p. 25Google Scholar.

10 Deutsch, p. 97.

11 Lerner, Daniel, The Passing of Traditional Society (Glencoe, Ill., 1958), p. 50Google Scholar.

12 Deutsch, p. 97.

13 Johnson, p. 21.

14 Dore, R. P., Education in Tokugawa Japan Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1965), pp. 296–297Google Scholar.

15 Hidetoshi, Katō, “Meiji nij7umacr;nendai nashonarizumu to komyunikeishon,” in Yoshio, Sakata, ed.,Meiji zenhanki no nashonarizumu (Tokyo, 1958), pp. 311–42Google Scholar.

16 Hearn, Lafcadio, The Writings of Lafcadio Hearn (Boston, 1923), VII, 283Google Scholar.

17 Katō, pp. 320–321.

18 Torao, Suzuki, ed., Katsunan bunroku (Toyko, 1933). p. 142Google Scholar.

19 “Japan's pattern of particularistic groupism not only allowed the relatively smooth acceptance of more rationalized thought and institutions, it also provided the motivation for it. The constant effort to improve the position of one's own group relative to others within the society was generalized to a competitiveness between Japan and other societies. The necessity for Japan's equality with or superiority to other nations is not a product of modern nationalism. Concerns of this sort lie deep in Japanese history. They are related to the national integration under the emperor mentioned above and helped provide in Japan an apparently easy fit with the model of the Western nation state, though in fact the basic structure was quite different.” Robert N. Bellah, “Continuity and Change in Japanese Society,” mimeo., 1970, pp. 10–11.

20 Craig, Albert M., “Fukuzawa Yukichi: The Philosophical Foundations of Meiji Nationalism,” in Ward, Robert E., ed., Political Development in Modern Japan (Princeton, 1968), pp. 99–102Google Scholar; and Craig, Albert M., Chōshū in the Meiji Restoration (Cambridge, Mass., 1961), p. 144Google Scholar.

21 Craig, Chōshū, p. 148.

22 Ibid., p. 149.

23 Potter, David M., “The Historian's Use of Nationalism and Vice Versa,” American Historical Review, LXVII, 4 (1962), 931Google Scholar.

24 Quoted in ibid.

25 Smith, Thomas C., The Agrarian Origins of Modern Japan (Stanford, 1959), p. 205.Google Scholar

26 Nisbet, Robert A., Community and Power (New York, 1962) p. 164Google Scholar.

27 Craig, “Fukuzawa Yukichi,” p. 102.

28 Morris, Ivan, Nationalism and the Right Wing in Japan (London, 1960), p. 39Google Scholar.

29 Quoted in ibid., p. 40.

30 Ibid., p. 58.

31 Masanao, Kano, “Sengo keiei to nōson kyōiku,” Shisō, 521 (1967), 42–59Google Scholar.

32 R. P. Dore and Tsutomu Ouchi, “Rural Origins of Japanese Fascism,” mimeo for VI Seminar of the Conference on Modern Japan.

33 Marshall, Byron K., Capitalism and Nationalism in Prewar Japan (Stanford, 1968)Google Scholar.

34 Jansen, Marius B., ed., Changing Japanese Attitudes Towards Modernization (Princeton, 1965), pp. 80–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

35 Quoted in Potter, p. 931.

36 Maruyama, Masao, Thought and Behaviour in Modern Japanese Politics (rev. ed., London, 1969), pp. 6–7Google Scholar.

37 Quoted in ibid.

38 Yamamura, Kozo, “A Re-examination of Entrepreneurship in Meiji Japan,” Economic History Review (Spring, 1968), 144–158Google Scholar.

39 Geertz, Clifford, “Ideology as a Cultural System,” in David E. Apter, ed., Ideology and Discontent (New York, 1964), p. 54Google Scholar.

40 For the best recent study of the problem of suicide in Japan, see Masaaki, Kōsaka and Jishō, Usui, eds. Nihon no jisatsu (Tokyo, 1966)Google Scholar.

41 Dore, R. P., ed., Aspects of Social Change in Modern Japan (Princeton, 1967), pp. 137–138Google Scholar.

42 See Dore, Ronald P., “The Bourgeoisie in Modernizing Societies,” International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences (New York, 1968), X, 402–409Google Scholar.

43 Geertz, “Ideology as a Cultural System,” p. 57.

44 Quoted in Davis, David Brion, “Some Recent Directions in American Cultural History,” American Historical Review, LXXIII, 3 (1968), 696–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

45 Ibid., p. 699 n.

46 See the review essay by Schlesinger, Arthur Jr., in History, and Theory, VII, 2 (1968), 217–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

47 Davis, “Some Recent Directions,” p. 698.

48 Geertz, “Ideology as a Cultural System,” p. 65.

49 Pyle, Kenneth B., The New Generation in Meiji Japan: Problems of Cultural Identity, 1885–1895 (Stanford, 1969)Google Scholar.

50 Jansen, Changing Japanese Attitudes, p. 81.

51 Wilson, Radical Nationalist in Japan, ch. 5.

52 Geertz, “Ideology as a Cultural System,” p. 58.

53 Hasegawa Nyozekan shū (Tokyo, 1960), p. 129Google Scholar.