Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T09:51:24.203Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Contesting Market Democracy: Possibilities and Contradictions of the Candlelight Protests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Michelle Williams*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, University of the Witwatersrand (Wits), Johannesburg, South Africa
Get access

Abstract

This commentary provides a critical discussion of the three essays in this forum and reflects on the similarities and differences between the crises of democracy under globalized neoliberal capitalism in South Korea and South Africa.

Type
Forum: South Korean Candlelight Protest Movement
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc., 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Baskin, Jeremy. 1991. Striking Back: A History of COSATU. Johannesburg: Ravan Press.Google Scholar
Chun, Jennifer Jihye. 2009. Organizing at the Margins: The Symbolic Politics of Labor in South Korea and the United States. Ithaca, N.Y.: ILR Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy, and Jaeggi, Rahel. 2018. Capitalism: A Conversation in Critical Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, David, et al. 1995. Taking Democracy Seriously: Worker Expectations and Parliamentary Democracy in South Africa. Durban: Indicator Press.Google Scholar
Satgar, Vishwas, and Southall, Roger. 2015. Cosatu in Crisis: The Fragmentation of an African Trade Union Federation. Johannesburg: KMM Publishers.Google Scholar
Seidman, Gay W. 1994. Manufacturing Militance: Workers Movements in Brazil and South Africa. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520913974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, Kwang-Yeong. 2013. “Economic Crisis, Neoliberal Reforms, and the Rise of Precarious Work in South Korea.” American Behavioral Scientist 57 (3): 335–53.10.1177/0002764212466241CrossRefGoogle Scholar