Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T19:35:58.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comment: Fascism and the History of Pre-War Japan: The Failure of a Concept

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2011

Peter Duus  and
Daniel I. Okimoto
Get access

Abstract

Following the end of the Second World War, Japanese and foreign scholars eagerly seized upon the concept of fascism as the basis of an analytic framework for explaining what had gone wrong in pre-war Japan and who, if anyone, could be held responsible. The literature on Japanese fascism is, as a result, quite extensive; some of it is richly insightful. The problem with such studies, however, is that fascism has never been satisfactorily defined, either logically or empirically. Recent studies have shown how difficult it is to find a definition that is at once broad enough to encompass the varieties of fascism across time and space and yet concrete enough to illumine distinctive characteristics. In this comment, some of the salient distinguishing features of the Japanese experience are alluded to, and a few important questions which studies of Japanese fascism have failed to address are identified. After nearly forty years' pursuit of the phantom of fascism, the time has come to direct our search toward alternative theoretical concepts which promise to throw new light and fresh perspective on what happened during the twenties and thirties, and why.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , November 1979 , pp. 65 - 76
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Sōgorō, Tanaka, Nihon Fuashizumu-shi (Tokyo: Kawaide Shobō, 1960)Google Scholar.

2 See Organski, A. F. K., The Stages of Political Development (New York: Alfred Knopf, 1965)Google Scholar; Moore, Barrington Jr, Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy (Boston: Beacon Press, 1966)Google Scholar; and Turner, H. A., “Fascism and Modernization,” World Politics 24, no. 4 ( July 1972): 547–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 See Huntington, Samuel P., “The Change to Change,” Comparative Politics 3, no. 3 ( April 1971): 283–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Nolte, Ernst, Three Faces of Fascism (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1966)Google Scholar.

5 Lipset, Seymour M., Political Man (New York: Doubleday, 1959)Google Scholar.

6 Linz, Juan J., “Some Notes Toward a Comparative Study of Fascism in Sociological Historical Perspective,” in Laqueur, Walter, ed., Fascism: A Readers’ Guide (Berkeley: Univ. of California Press, 1976), pp. 3–121Google Scholar.

7 Gregor, A. James, The Ideology of Fascism (New York: Free Press, 1969)Google Scholar.

8 Allardyce, Gilbert, “What Fascism Is Not: Thoughts on the Deflation of a Concept,” American Historical Review 84, no. 2 ( April 1979): 367–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Wilson, George M., “A New Look at the Problem of ‘Japanese Fascism,’” Comparative Studies in Society and History 10, no. 4 ( July 1968): 401–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Maruyama, Masao, Thought and Behaviour in Modern Japanese Politics (New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1963)Google Scholar.

10 Jirō, Kamishima, “Mental Structure of the Emperor System,” The Developing Economies 5, no. 4 ( December 1967): 702–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Drucker, Peter, The End of Economic Man (New York: John Day, 1939)Google Scholar.

12 Steven, R. P. G., “Hybrid Constitutionalism in Prewar Japan,” The Journal of Japanese Studies 3, no. 1 (Winter 1977): 99–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Titus, David A., Palace and Politics in Prewar Politics (New York: Columbia Univ. Press, 1974)Google Scholar.

14 Pyle, Kenneth B., “The Technology of Japanese Nationalism: The Local Improvement Movement 1900–1918,” JAS 33, no. 1 ( November 1973): 51–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, “Advantages of Followership: German Economics and Japanese Bureaucrats, 1890–1925,” The Journal of Japanese Studies 1, no. 1 (Autumn 1974): 127–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mikio, Sumiya, “Kokuminteki Vuijiyon no tōgo to bunkai,” in Sei, Ito, ed., Kindai Nihon shisōshi kōza (Tokyo: Chikuma Shobō, 1960), 5: 51–106Google Scholar.

15 Dahl, Robert A., Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City (New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1961)Google Scholar.

16 Schmitter, Philippe, “Still the Century of Corporatism?,” Review of Politics 36 ( January 1974): 85–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, ed., “Corporatism and Policy-Making in Contemporary Western Europe,” Comparative Political Studies 10, no. 10 ( April 1977): 7–27Google Scholar.

17 The full implications of Karl Deutsch's term “self-steering” are discussed in Nerves of Government (New York: Free Press, 1966)Google Scholar.

18 Berger, Gordon M., Parties Out of Power in Japan, 1931–1941 (Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1977)Google Scholar.

19 Deutsch, Nerves of Government.

20 See Moore, Social Origins.

21 Wallerstein, Immanuel, The Modern World-System (New York: Academic Press, 1974)Google Scholar. See also Cardoso, Ferdinand E., “Associated Dependent Development,” in Stephan, Alfred, ed., Authoritarian Brazil (New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1973). pp. 142–76Google Scholar.

22 Chomsky, Noam, “The Revolutionary Pacifism of A. J. Muste: On the Backgrounds of the Pacific War,” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars 3 ( March 1969): 27–50Google Scholar.

23 North, Robert and Choucri, Nazli, Nations in Conflict (San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1975)Google Scholar.