Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:36:01.838Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two Rationales Behind the ‘Buy-And-Hold or Sell-At-Once’ Strategy

Part of: Stochastic processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

S. C. P. Yam ,
S. P. Yung  and
W. Zhou
S. C. P. Yam*
Affiliation:
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
S. P. Yung*
Affiliation:
The University of Hong Kong
W. Zhou*
Affiliation:
The University of Hong Kong
*
∗Postal address: Department of Applied Mathematics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
∗∗Postal address: Department of Applied Mathematics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
∗∗Postal address: Department of Applied Mathematics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The trading strategy of ‘buy-and-hold for superior stock and sell-at-once for inferior stock’, as suggested by conventional wisdom, has long been prevalent in Wall Street. In this paper, two rationales are provided to support this trading strategy from a purely mathematical standpoint. Adopting the standard binomial tree model (or CRR model for short, as first introduced in Cox, Ross and Rubinstein (1979)) to model the stock price dynamics, we look for the optimal stock selling rule(s) so as to maximize (i) the chance that an investor can sell a stock precisely at its ultimate highest price over a fixed investment horizon [0,T]; and (ii) the expected ratio of the selling price of a stock to its ultimate highest price over [0,T]. We show that both problems have exactly the same optimal solution which can literally be interpreted as ‘buy-and-hold or sell-at-once’ depending on the value of p (the going-up probability of the stock price at each step): when p›½, selling the stock at the last time step N is the optimal selling strategy; when p=½, a selling time is optimal if the stock is sold either at the last time step or at the time step when the stock price reaches its running maximum price; and when p‹½, time 0, i.e. selling the stock at once, is the unique optimal selling time.

Keywords

p-random walkbinomial tree modeloptimal stoppingmartingales

MSC classification

Secondary: 60G40: Stopping times; optimal stopping problems; gambling theory
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Applied Probability , Volume 46 , Issue 3 , September 2009 , pp. 651 - 668
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 2009 

References

Allaart, P. (2004). Optimal stopping rules for correlated random walks with a discount. J. Appl. Prob. 41, 483–496.Google Scholar
Allaart, P. and Monticino, M. (2008). Optimal buy/sell rules for correlated random walks. J. Appl. Prob. 45, 33–44.Google Scholar
Boyle, P. (1988). A lattice framework for option pricing with two state variables. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 23, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chow, Y. S., Robbins, H. and Siegmund, D. (1971). Great Expectations: The Theory of Optional Stopping. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Cox, J. C., Ross, S. A. and Rubinstein, M. (1979). Option pricing: a simplified approach. J. Financial Econom. 7, 229–263.Google Scholar
Du Toit, J. and Peskir, G (2008). Selling a stock at the ultimate maximum. Ann. Appl. Prob. 19, 983–1014.Google Scholar
Dynkin, E. B. (1963). The optimum choice of the instant for stopping a Markov process. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 150, 238–240.Google Scholar
Feller, W. (1968). An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, Vol. I, 3rd edn. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Gerber, H. U. and Shiu, E. S. W. (1994). Martingale approach to pricing perpetual American options. ASTIN Bull. 24, 195–220.Google Scholar
Hlynka, M. and Sheahan, J. N. (1988). The secretary problem for a random walk. Stoch. Process. Appl. 28, 317–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kijima, M. (2003). Stochastic Processes with Applications to Finance. Chapman and Hall, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
Lai, T. L. and Lim, T. W. (2002). Exercise regions and efficient valuation of American lookback options. Math. Finance 14, 249–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindley, D. V. (1961). Dynamic programming and decision theory. Appl. Statist. 10, 39–51.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, M. (1994). Implied binomial trees. J. Finance 49, 771–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiryaev, A. N. (1978). Optimal Stopping Rules. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Shiryaev, A. N., Xu, Z. and Zhou, X. Y. (2008). Thou shalt buy and hold. Quant. Finance 8, 765–776.Google Scholar
Yam, S. C. P., Yung, S. P. and Zhou, W. (2008). Optimal selling time in stock market over a finite time horizon. Submitted.Google Scholar