Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:35:43.303Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The superposition of independent discrete Markovian packet streams

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

Marcel F. Neuts  and
Charles E. M. Pearce
Marcel F. Neuts*
Affiliation:
University of Arizona
Charles E. M. Pearce*
Affiliation:
University of Adelaide
*
∗Postal address: Department of Systems and Industrial Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.
∗∗Postal address: Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In a finite, aperiodic, irreducible Markov chain, a visit to some states generates a one; to some others, a zero, while the remaining states are considered silent, in that neither symbol is generated. States during which either a one or a zero is generated are called active states, and sojourns in the set of active states correspond to messages. The output process is called a Markovian packet stream. Informally, a stream is called thin, if the steady-state fraction of time spent in the active states is small and messages are separated by silent periods of long durations. A limit theorem for the superposition of a large number of independent, stochastically identical and appropriately thin Markovian packet streams is obtained. The class of limit processes consists of a family of stationary, integer-valued, discrete-parameter processes of dependent Poisson random variables. Some properties of the limit processes are established.

Keywords

DISCRETE POINT PROCESSESLIMIT PROCESS OF SUPERPOSITION
Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Applied Probability , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , March 1991 , pp. 84 - 95
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 1991 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This research was supported in part by Grants ECS-8803061 from the National Science Foundation and AFOSR-88–0076 from the Air Force Office of Scientific Research.

References

[1] Heffes, H. (1980) A class of data traffic processes – Covariance function characterization and related queueing results. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 59, 897–929.Google Scholar
[2] Mckenzie, E. (1989) Some ARMA models for dependent sequences of Poisson counts. Adv. Appl. Prob. 20, 822–835.Google Scholar
[3] Neuts, M. F. (1981) Matrix-Geometric Solutions in Stochastic Models: An Algorithmic Approach. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
[4] Neuts, M. F. (1990) On Viterbi's formula for the mean delay in a queue of data packets. Stochastic Models 6, 87–98.Google Scholar
[5] Neuts, M. F. (1990) On the packet stream generated by a random flow of messages of random durations. Stochastic Models 6, 445–470.Google Scholar
[6] Neuts, M. F. (1989) Structured Stochastic Matrices of M/G/1 Type and their Applications. Marcel Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
[7] Ramaswami, V. (1988) Traffic performance modeling for packet communication, whence where and whither? Keynote Address, 3rd Australian Teletraffic Research Seminar, Melbourne.Google Scholar
[8] Ramaswami, V. and Latouche, G. (1988) Modeling packet arrivals from asynchronous input lines. Proc. 12th Internat. Teletraffic Conference, Torino, Italy. Google Scholar
[9] Sriram, K. and Whitt, W. (1986) Characterizing superposition arrival processes in packet multiplexers for voice and data. IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun. Special Issue on Network Performance Evaluation 4, 833–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Viterbi, A. M. (1986) Approximate analysis of time-synchronous packet networks. IEEE J. on Select. Areas Commun. Special Issue on Network Performance Evaluation 4, 879–890.Google Scholar