Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-17T18:34:56.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The spatial distribution of Tribolium confusum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

Eric Renshaw*
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
*
Postal address: Department of Statistics, University of Edinburgh, James Clerk Maxwell Building, The King's Buildings, Mayfield Rd., Edinburgh EH9 3JZ, U.K.

Abstract

Neyman, Park and Scott (1956) describe an experiment which they performed to determine the spatial distribution of Tribolium confusum developing within a closed container. To explain the concentration of beetles at the boundary a birth–death–migration model is developed in which the beetles may migrate over a set of lattice points, and this is shown to produce a distribution of the required shape. Not only is this distribution independent of the number of lattice points, but it is also indistinguishable from the associated diffusion process.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Box, G. E. P. and Cox, D. R. (1964) An analysis of transformations. J. R. Statist. Soc. B26, 211252.Google Scholar
Boyce, J. M. (1946) The influence of fecundity and egg mortality on the population growth of Tribolium confusum Duval. Ecology 27, 290302.Google Scholar
Broadbent, S. R. and Kendall, D. G. (1953) The random walk of Trichostrongylus retortaeformis. Biometrics 9, 460466.Google Scholar
Cox, D. R. and Miller, H. D. (1965) The Theory of Stochastic Processes. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Cox, D. R. and Smith, W. L. (1957) On the distribution of Tribolium confusum in a container. Biometrika 44, 328335.Google Scholar
Fujita, H. and Utida, S. (1953) The effect of population density on the growth of an animal population. Ecology 34, 488498.Google Scholar
Neyman, J., Park, T. and Scott, E. L. (1956) Struggle for existence. The Tribolium model: biological and statistical aspects. Proc. 3rd Berkeley Symp. Math. Statist. Prob. 4, 4179.Google Scholar
Park, T. (1948) Experimental studies of interspecies competition. I. Competition between populations of the flour beetles, Tribolium confusum Duval and Tribolium castaneum Herbst. Ecol. Mono. 18, 265307.Google Scholar
Park, T. (1954) Experimental studies of interspecies competition. II. Temperature, humidity, and competition in two species of Tribolium. Physiol. Zoöl. 27, 177238.Google Scholar
Park, T. (1957) Experimental studies of interspecies competition. III. Relation of initial species proportion to competitive outcome in populations of Tribolium. Physiol. Zoöl. 30, 2240.Google Scholar
Patil, V. T. (1957) The consistency and adequacy of the Poisson–Markoff model for density fluctuations. Biometrika 44, 4356.Google Scholar
Pearl, R. (1932) The influence of density of population upon egg production in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Exp. Zool. 63, 5784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renshaw, E. (1972) Birth, death and migration processes. Biometrika 59, 4960.Google Scholar
Renshaw, E. (1974) Stepping-stone models for population growth. J. Appl. Prob. 11, 1631.Google Scholar
Rich, E. R. (1956) Egg cannibalism and fecundity in Tribolium. Ecology 37, 109120.Google Scholar
Sherman, B. (1956) The limiting distribution of Brownian motion on a finite interval with instantaneous return. Westinghouse Research Laboratory, Scientific Paper 60–94698–3–P3.Google Scholar
Stanley, J. (1932) A mathematical theory of the growth of populations of the flour beetle, Tribolium confusum, Duv. Canad. J. Res. 6, 632671.Google Scholar
Usher, M. B. and Williamson, M. H. (1970) A deterministic matrix model for handling the birth, death and migration processes of spatially distributed populations. Biometrics 23, 112.Google Scholar