Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T06:50:57.456Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A solution to the generalized birthday problem with application to allozyme screening for cell culture contamination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

M. H. Gail*
Affiliation:
National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
G. H. Weiss*
Affiliation:
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
N. Mantel*
Affiliation:
George Washington University, Washington, D. C.
S. J. O'Brien*
Affiliation:
National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
*
Postal address: National Cancer Institute, Landow Building, Room 5C-09, Bethesda MD 20014, U.S.A.
∗∗Postal address: Division of Computer Research and Technology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda MD 20014, U.S.A.
∗∗∗Postal address: Biostatistics Center, George Washington University, Washington D.C. 20006, U.S.A. Research supported by Public Health Service Grant CA-15686 from the National Cancer Institute.
Postal address: National Cancer Institute, Landow Building, Room 5C-09, Bethesda MD 20014, U.S.A.

Abstract

This paper gives the probability that no common allozyme signature is found among n randomly selected cell culture lines when the s mutually exclusive and exhaustive signatures have arbitrary known probabilities. This result is useful in detecting cell culture contamination by a single cell line. This problem is a generalization of the classic problem of finding the probability of no common birthday among n individuals when it is assumed that each individual has a chance 1/s = 1/365 of a birthday on a given day. Both an exact recursive solution and an approximate solution are given for the general problem.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 1979 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Courant, R. and Hilbert, D. (1953) Methods of Mathematical Physics, Vol. 1. Interscience, New York.Google Scholar
David, F. N. and Barton, D. E. (1962) Combinatorial Chance. Hafner, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feller, W. (1957) An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications, Vol. 1. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
O'Brien, S. J., Kleiner, G., Olson, R. and Shannon, J. E. (1977) Enzyme polymorphisms as genetic signatures in human cell cultures. Science 195, 13451348.Google Scholar
O'Brien, S. J., Shannon, J. E. and Gail, M. H. (1979) A molecular approach to the identification and individuation of human and animal cells in culture: isozyme and allozyme genetic signatures.Google Scholar
Riordan, J. (1958) An Introduction to Combinatorial Analysis. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Rust, P. F. (1976) The effect of leap years and seasonal trends on the birthday problem. Amer. Statistician 30, 197198.Google Scholar
Von Mises, R. (1939) Über Aufteilungs- und Besetzungs-Wahrscheinlichkeiten. Rev. Fac. Sci. Univ. Istanbul 4, 145163. Reprinted in Selected Papers of Richard von Mises, Vol. 2 (1964), ed. Goldstein, F. S., Kac, M., Prager, W. and Szego, G., American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I., 313–334.Google Scholar