Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:05:42.001Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Optimal Stopping of a Risk Reserve Process with Interest and Cost Rates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

A. Schöttl*
Affiliation:
Technical University of Munich
*
Postal address: Center of Mathematics Sciences, Technical University of Munich, D-80290 Munich, Germany

Abstract

The risk reserve process of an insurance company within a deteriorating Markov-modulated environment is considered. The company invests its capital with interest rate α; the premiums and claims are increasing with rates β and γ. The problem of stopping the process at a random time which maximizes the expected net gain in order to calculate new premiums is investigated. A semimartingale representation of the risk reserve process yields, under certain conditions, an explicit solution of the problem.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 1998 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asmussen, S., and Rolski, T. (1994). Risk theory in a periodic environment: The Cramér–Lundberg approximation and Lundberg's inequality. Math. Operat. Res. 19, 410432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brémaud, P. (1981). Point Processes and Queues. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Embrechts, P., and Schmidli, H. (1994). Ruin estimation for a general insurance risk model. Adv. Appl. Prob. 26, 404422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grigelionis, B. (1993). Two-sided Lundbery inequalities in a Markovian environment. Liet. Matem. Rink. 1, 3041.Google Scholar
Jensen, U., and Hsu, G. (1993). Optimal stopping by means of point process observations with applications in reliability. Math. Operat. Res. 18.3, 645657.Google Scholar
Jensen, U. (1997). An optimal stopping problem in risk theory. Scand. Acturial J. 2, 149159.Google Scholar