Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:42:15.894Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Residual and Inactivity Times of the Components of Used Coherent Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2016

S. Goliforushani*
Affiliation:
University of Isfahan
M. Asadi*
Affiliation:
University of Isfahan
N. Balakrishnan*
Affiliation:
McMaster University
*
Postal address: Department of Statistics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, 81744, Iran.
Postal address: Department of Statistics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, 81744, Iran.
∗∗∗ Postal address: Department of Mathematics and Statistics, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada. Email address: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the study of the reliability of technical systems in reliability engineering, coherent systems play a key role. In this paper we consider a coherent system consisting of n components with independent and identically distributed components and propose two time-dependent criteria. The first criterion is a measure of the residual lifetime of live components of a coherent system having some of the components alive when the system fails at time t. The second criterion is a time-dependent measure which enables us to investigate the inactivity times of the failed components of a coherent system still functioning though some of its components have failed. Several ageing and stochastic properties of the proposed measures are then established.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Applied Probability Trust 

References

Asadi, M. (2006). On the mean past lifetime of components of a parallel system. J. Statist. Planning Infer. 136, 11971206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asadi, M. and Bayramoglu, I. (2005). A note on the mean residual life function of a parallel system. Commun. Statist. Theory Meth. 34, 475484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asadi, M. and Bayramoglu, I. (2006). The mean residual life function of a k-out-of-n structure at the system level. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 55, 314318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asadi, M. and Berred, A. (2011). Properties and estimation of mean past lifetime. Statistics (electronic).Google Scholar
Asadi, M. and Goliforushani, S. (2008). On the mean residual life function of coherent systems. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 57, 574580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bairamov, I., Ahsanullah, M. and Akhundov, I. (2002). A residual life function of a system having parallel or series structures. J. Statist. Theory Appl. 1, 119131.Google Scholar
Gertsbakh, I., Shpungin, Y. and Spizzichino, F. (2011). Signatures of coherent systems built with separate modules. J. Appl. Prob. 48, 843855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khaledi, B. E. and Shaked, M. (2007). Ordering conditional lifetimes of coherent systems. J. Statist. Planning Infer. 137, 11731184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochar, S., Mukerjee, H. and Samaniego, F. J. (1999). The ‘signature’ of a coherent system and its application to comparisons among systems. Naval Res. Logistics 46, 507523.3.0.CO;2-D>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, S. and Lynch, J. (2010). Some elementary ideas concerning the complexity of system structure. Naval Res. Logistics 57, 626633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, X. and Zhang, Z. (2008). Some stochastic comparisons of conditional coherent systems. Appl. Stoch. Models Business Industry 24, 541549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, X. and Zhang, Z. (2008). Stochastic comparisons on general inactivity time and general residual life of k-out-of-n systems. Commun. Statist. Simul. Comput. 37, 10051019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, X. and Zhao, P. (2006). Some ageing properties of the residual life of k-out-of-n systems. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 55, 535541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahmoudi, M. and Asadi, M. (2011). On the conditional signature of coherent systems. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 60, 817822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, J. and Hernandez, P. J. (2008). Mean residual life functions of finite mixtures, order statistics and coherent systems. Metrika 67, 277298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, J., Balakrishnan, N. and Samaniego, F. J. (2008). Mixture representations of residual lifetimes of used systems. J. Appl. Prob. 45, 10971112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, J., Ruiz, J. M. and Sandoval, C. J. (2005). A note on comparisons among coherent systems with dependent components using signatures. Statist. Prob. Lett. 72, 179185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, J., Ruiz, J. M. and Sandoval, C. J. (2007). Properties of coherent systems with dependent components. Commun. Statist. Theory Meth. 36, 175191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, J., Samaniego, F. J. and Balakrishnan, N. (2011). The Joint signature of coherent systems with shared components. J. Appl. Prob. 47, 235253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, J., Samaniego, F. J. and Balakrishnan, N. (2011). Signature-based representations for the reliability of systems with heterogeneous components. J. Appl. Prob. 48, 856867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samaniego, F. J. (1985). On closure of the IFR class under formation of coherent systems. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 34, 6972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samaniego, F. J., Balakrishnan, N. and Navarro, J. (2009). Dynamic signatures and their use in comparing the reliability of new and used systems. Naval Res. Logistics 56, 577591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaked, M. and Shanthikumar, J. G. (2007). Stochastic Orders. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tavangar, M. and Asadi, M. (2010). A study on the mean past lifetime of the components of (n-k+1)-out-of-n system at the system level. Metrika 72, 5973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Z. (2010). Mixture representations of inactivity times of conditional coherent systems and their applications. J. Appl. Prob. 47, 876885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Z. (2010). Ordering conditional general coherent systems with exchangeable components. J. Statist. Planning Infer. 140, 454460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar