Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T22:01:15.645Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the nature of the binomial distribution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

P. Vellaisamy*
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay
Abraham P. Punnen
Affiliation:
University of New Brunswick
*
Postal address: Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology, Mumbai-400 076, India. Email address: [email protected]

Abstract

We examine how the binomial distribution B(n,p) arises as the distribution Sn = ∑i=1nXi of an arbitrary sequence of Bernoulli variables. It is shown that B(n,p) arises in infinitely many ways as the distribution of dependent and non-identical Bernoulli variables, and arises uniquely as that of independent Bernoulli variables. A number of illustrative examples are given. The cases B(2,p) and B(3,p) are completely analyzed to bring out some of the intrinsic properties of the binomial distribution. The conditions under which Sn follows B(n,p), given that Sn-1 is not necessarily a binomial variable, are investigated. Several natural characterizations of B(n,p), including one which relates the binomial distributions and the Poisson process, are also given. These results and characterizations lead to a better understanding of the nature of the binomial distribution and enhance the utility.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © by the Applied Probability Trust 2001 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

∗∗

Current address: Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur-208016, India.

References

Barbour, A. D, Holst, L., and Janson, S. (1992). Poisson Approximation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barlow, R., and Proschan, F. (1975). Statistical Theory of Reliability and Life Testing. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
Blom, G., Holst, L., and Sandell, D. (1994). Problems and Snapshots from the World of Probability. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casella, G., and Berger, R. L. (1990). Statistical Inference. Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, California.Google Scholar
Drezner, Z., and Farnum, N. (1993). A generalized binomial distribution. Commun. Statist. Theory Meth. 22, 30513063.Google Scholar
Johnson, N. L., Kotz, S., and Kemp, A. W. (1992). Univariate Discrete Distributions. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Vellaisamy, P. (1996). On the number of successes in dependent trials. Commun. Statist. Theory Meth. 25, 17451756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y. H. (1993). On the number of successes in independent trials. Statist. Sinica. 3, 295312.Google Scholar