Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:53:53.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Binomial Observations of Continuous-Time Markovian Population Models

Part of: Markov processes Inference from stochastic processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2018

N. G. Bean ,
R. Elliott ,
A. Eshragh  and
J. V. Ross
N. G. Bean*
Affiliation:
The University of Adelaide
R. Elliott*
Affiliation:
The University of Adelaide
A. Eshragh*
Affiliation:
The University of Newcastle
J. V. Ross*
Affiliation:
The University of Adelaide
*
∗ Postal address: School of Mathematical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
∗ Postal address: School of Mathematical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
∗∗ Postal address: School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia Email address: [email protected]
∗ Postal address: School of Mathematical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this paper we consider a class of stochastic processes based on binomial observations of continuous-time, Markovian population models. We derive the conditional probability mass function of the next binomial observation given a set of binomial observations. For this purpose, we first find the conditional probability mass function of the underlying continuous-time Markovian population model, given a set of binomial observations, by exploiting a conditional Bayes' theorem from filtering, and then use the law of total probability to find the former. This result paves the way for further study of the stochastic process introduced by the binomial observations. We utilize our results to show that binomial observations of the simple birth process are non-Markovian.

Keywords

Continuous-time Markovian population modelbinomial observationsimple birth processfiltering

MSC classification

Primary: 60J27: Continuous-time Markov processes on discrete state spaces
Secondary: 60J80: Branching processes (Galton-Watson, birth-and-death, etc.) 62M09: Non-Markovian processes 62M20: Prediction
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Applied Probability , Volume 52 , Issue 2 , June 2015 , pp. 457 - 472
Copyright
© Applied Probability Trust 

References

Aggoun, L. and Elliott, R. J. (1998). Recursive estimation in capture recapture models. Sultan Qaboos Univ. Oman Sci. Tech. 3, 67–75.Google Scholar
Baldi, P. and Brunak, S. (2001). Bioinformatics, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Bean, N. G., Eshragh, A. and Ross, J. V. (2015). Fisher information for a partially-observable simple birth process. To appear in Commun. Statist. Theory Meth.Google Scholar
Becker, N. (1972). Vaccination programmes for rare infectious diseases. Biometrika 59, 443–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, A. J. and McKane, A. J. (2012). Stochastic formulation of ecological models and their applications. Trends Ecology Evolution 27, 337–345.Google Scholar
Clark, J. S. and Bjørnstad, O. N. (2004). Population time series: process variability, observation errors, missing values, lags, and hidden states. Ecology 85, 3140–3150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cvitanı´c, J., Liptser, R. and Rozovskii, B. (2006). A filtering approach to tracking volatility from prices observed at random times. Ann. Appl. Prob. 16, 1633–1652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, R. J. (1982). Stochastic Calculus and Applications. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Elliott, R. J., Aggoun, L. and Moore, J. B. (1995). Hidden Markov Models: Estimation and Control. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Fink, G. A. (2008). Markov Models for Pattern Recognition: From Theory to Applications. Springer, London.Google Scholar
Fuller, W. A. (1987). Measurement Error Models. John Wiley, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerberry, D. J. (2009). Trade-off between BCG vaccination and the ability to detect and treat latent tuberculosis. J. Theoret. Biol. 261, 548–560.Google Scholar
Kao, R. R. (2003). The impact of local heterogeneity on alternative control strategies for foot-and-mouth disease. Proc. R. Soc. London B 270, 2557–2564.Google Scholar
Kaplan, S., Itzkovitz, S. and Shapiro, E. (2007). A universal mechanism ties genotype to phenotype in trinucleotide diseases. PLoS Comput. Biol. 3, 2291–2298.Google Scholar
Keeling, M. J. and Ross, J. V. (2008). On methods for studying stochastic disease dynamics. J. R. Soc. Interface 5, 171–181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moran, P. A. P. (1951). Estimation methods for evolutive processes. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 13, 141–146.Google Scholar
Norris, J. R. (1997). Markov Chains. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novozhilov, A. S., Karev, G. P. and Koonin, E. V. (2006). Biological applications of the theory of birth-and-death processes. Briefings Bioinformatics 7, 70–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olson, C. A., Beard, K. H., Koons, D. N. and Pitt, W. C. (2012). Detection probabilities of two introduced frogs in Hawaii: implications for assessing non-native species distributions. Biol. Invasions 14, 889–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ponciano, J. M., De Gelder, L., Top, E. M. and Joyce, P. (2007). The population biology of bacterial plasmids: a hidden Markov model approach. Genetics 176, 957–968.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Renshaw, E. (1991). Modelling Biological Populations in Space and Time. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, J. V. (2012). On parameter estimation in population models III: time-inhomogeneous processes and observation error. Theoret. Pop. Biol. 82, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ross, S. M. (1996). Stochastic Processes, 2nd edn. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Seber, G. A. F. (1982). The Estimation of Animal Abundance and Related Parameters, 2nd edn. Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
Solow, A. R. (1998). On fitting a population model in the presence of observation error. Ecology 79, 1463–1466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaseghi, S. V. (2009). Advanced Digital Signal Processing and Noise Reduction, 4th edn. John Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
Yule, G. U. (1925). A mathematical theory of evolution, based on the conclusions of Dr. J. C. Willis, F.R.S. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B 213, 21–87.Google Scholar
Zeng, Y. (2003). A partially observed model for micromovement of asset prices with Bayes estimation via filtering. Math. Finance 13, 411–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar